Ok, but almost every team has some matches where luck goes against them and some where it goes for them. I understand that confirmation bias is strongly at work here, and you want Liverpool to be lucky (as that is better than admitting they are good), so you find the evidence to support this. However, they have had some great luck, but some bad luck as well. Just like any team.
I’m not a fanatic so there’s no confirmation bias here. They are definitely the second best team in the league, but luck is a rather ephemeral concept. I just can’t remember in 30 years watching league football so many vital point-winning events go for one team in one season.
You are aware that they have been playing their 4th choice center back for two months now, correct? Or that they were playing Fabinho, a midfielder, at center back for some games as they had 3 center backs injured? You are aware that the only real "poor" run of form this year coincided with TAA being out injured? Not to mention our first choice central midfielder, which can reasonably be dismissed, as he's been out for a year.
And that ‘4th’ choice centre back (according to Liverpool’s fans I know) has also been in his best form. Do you remember when Arsenal won the league with Alex Manniger and Christopher Wthe putting in world class performances during the crucial run-in games? That’s the kind of comparison I see with a few members of your squad this year. It makes a difference...will your players retain this form next season?
I totally agree with you about TAA, though (I think Klopp has got a little, if I may use the term, lucky that his 2 fullbacks have turned out to be fantastic creative outlets. I don’t think TAA was out for months, was he? And if you’re saying the Ox is your best midfielder, I’d respectfully suggest his defensive game wouldn’t work at all with Klopp’s current compact set-up. If you meant Keita, I haven’t seen him play enough to make any judgement.
Oh, so no serious underperformance, except from the reigning PFA player of the year... And anyways, that isn't particularly true. Firminho hasn't been as good as he was last year either. He hasn't been poor (though neither has Salah to be fair), but things just aren't clicking at times.
I’d argue that, apart from Salah, your forward players have played at the top of their games. Firmino is a good player but I haven’t seen an alarming lack of form from him this season, and when you’ve needed them, Shakiri and Sturridge have chopped-in with crucial goals (how many times would those goals against Chelsea and United go in normally?). But this has definitely (especially after the City defeat) a challenge built more on defence than attack and you have to give Klopp much credit for doing this - it’s how titles are won.
Those are terrible comparisons, as randomness plays a far larger role in two legged cup ties, than over a 38 game season. Do you know the right comparison? United under Ferguson. You used to get "lucky" all the time. You'd score late goals, get penalty decisions going your way, win when you played poorly, etc. Thats not a sign of cosmic intervention, but instead a sign of a good side putting themselves in the position to win even when they aren't playing their best.
Also, Liverpool are currently on track to finish with 94 points. That would be the third highest point total in Premier League history. You really have to tie yourself into knots to pretend a side on track for 94 points isn't that good. They are an incredible side, with arguably the best central defender in the world, an elite goalkeeper, two excellent fullbacks, and world class players across the attack. Only in midfield do they suffer in comparison to City, arguably the greatest side in Premier League history. So yes, they have gotten some luck, but luck can't explain 94 points. Only being really really really good can.