Alex99
Rehab's Pete Doherty
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 17,303
Remind me how ferguson replaced Ronaldo again...
He put Rooney in a more prominent role and we went on to win two more league titles and reach a cl final
Remind me how ferguson replaced Ronaldo again...
Is the joke now pretending this hasn't been repeated a gazillion times?Coutinho is all set to be the first person since 1990 to play for Liverpool and get a league winner's medal in the same season!
He put Rooney in a more prominent role and we went on to win two more league titles and reach a cl final
Lemar is certainly no replacement for Coutinho.
A true small club mentality, to sell a player for €150 million and then downgrade by taking players from Leicester City and Southampton. How do you ever expect to progress?
Let me say that again... you have €150 million. You have freed up around 300k in wages with the sale of Coutinho and probably Sturridge and Ings aswell so why on earth are they not going out for an “upgrade” like Sanchez or Griezmann or even Cavani or Aubameyang? What’s their excuse this time?
Champions League football - Check
Big Transfer budget - Check
Big Wage Budget - Check
“Top” manager - Check
I’m beginning to think no top “established” player wants to join them.... It’s as simple as that. Liverpool are a selling club, a stepping stone and they will never compete with the elite teams around the world if they’re constantly bending over and selling their best players.
The cycle will just keep on repeating.
Well done. You are now the 122nd person to make that comment it seems (though I only saw it for the first time a page ago) !Coutinho is all set to be the first person since 1990 to play for Liverpool and get a league winner's medal in the same season!
I guess selling the world's best player and downgrading with a player from Wigan is not 'a true small club mentality' then.
You are correct. I've been saying the same on Liverpool forums. People are talking about replacing Coutinho (the Mahrez chatter isn't going away but it seems it's becoming more and more likely that Klopp wants Lemar and will even be prepared to wait until the Summer for him - a mistake in my mind as we do need more squad depth in attack). However without Naby Keita (see my next post below), we are lacking strength, depth and creativity in midfield. And I'd much rather that we prioritise bringing in two more strong central midfielders to partner Keita (Hendo is a sicknote, Milner in his last 2 seasons at this level, Gini simply good but not great and Can is off - no loss in my book). That would have a far more reaching effect than another attacker or even defender.Interesting to see how liverpool replace his passing and creativity from midfield and his goals too until the end of the season. Dont think either Giorgino or henderson have his passing ability or ability for a through pass. Can can drive with the ball but not as effective as Coutinho. Also he may be going to Juve anyway so will be frustrating for liverpool.
We changed our system to allow another world class player to flourish and continued to be successful.
But by all means continue to equate the best manager of all time managing one of the best sides in Europe even without Ronaldo to your chap with his run of cup final defeats, trophyless seasons and a team that continues to rely on Jordan Henderson, Alberto Moreno, Dejan Lovren and Simon Mignolet.
Lemar is certainly no replacement for Coutinho.
A true small club mentality, to sell a player for €150 million and then downgrade by taking players from Leicester City and Southampton. How do you ever expect to progress?
Let me say that again... you have €150 million. You have freed up around 300k in wages with the sale of Coutinho and probably Sturridge and Ings aswell so why on earth are they not going out for an “upgrade” like Sanchez or Griezmann or even Cavani or Aubameyang? What’s their excuse this time?
Champions League football - Check
Big Transfer budget - Check
Big Wage Budget - Check
“Top” manager - Check
I’m beginning to think no top “established” player wants to join them.... It’s as simple as that. Liverpool are a selling club, a stepping stone and they will never compete with the elite teams around the world if they’re constantly bending over and selling their best players.
The cycle will just keep on repeating.
You are entirely missing the point and showing your butt-hurt in the process.
According to rumour, Liverpool are trying to 'replace' Coutinho with Lemar/Mahrez
On paper, United 'replaced' Ronaldo with Valencia
Why the intense scrutiny for Liverpool, but United get a free pass?
I guess selling the world's best player and downgrading with a player from Wigan is not 'a true small club mentality' then.
the story is basically
Holgate pushes firmino into the stands
firmino gets up and calls him a son of a bitch in portugese
Holgate thinks he's been racially abused
Plus Michael Owen on a free and Gabriel Obertan.
You're spot on. The genius of Ferguson just masked over the damage this and other business the Glazers have done since they took over, has done to the club. It's one big reason we're so far behind City. ...But that's for another thread.
As for Liverpool, selling your star man mid-season is a bad decision. We just need to hope it costs them top 4, which would set Klopp back a couple of years.
I think you will sign at least a central midfielder too, it deosnt make sense not to. It may take keita half a season to adjust too and Its no guarantee how he settles in liverpool. I think Leaving Lemar till summer will be huge mistake, United (As per duncan castles ) have an interest in him and although wont spend the money in jan, but may go for him in the summer. Chelsea are another one as hazard seems to be angling towards Madrid, while madrid themselves will be wanting a creative player and Zidane being french would appeal much more than most clubs. Arsenal also want him, wenger factor will come in and also they will probably want to sign someone to calm the fans after they lose both Sanchez and Ozil.You are correct. I've been saying the same on Liverpool forums. People are talking about replacing Coutinho (the Mahrez chatter isn't going away but it seems it's becoming more and more likely that Klopp wants Lemar and will even be prepared to wait until the Summer for him - a mistake in my mind as we do need more squad depth in attack). However without Naby Keita (see my next post below), we are lacking strength, depth and creativity in midfield. And I'd much rather that we prioritise bringing in two more strong central midfielders to partner Keita (Hendo is a sicknote, Milner in his last 2 seasons at this level, Gini simply good but not great and Can is off - no loss in my book). That would have a far more reaching effect than another attacker or even defender.
You are entirely missing the point and showing your butt-hurt in the process.
According to rumour, Liverpool are trying to 'replace' Coutinho with Lemar/Mahrez
On paper, United 'replaced' Ronaldo with Valencia
Why the intense scrutiny for Liverpool, but United get a free pass?
Bayern need a manager at end of the season dont they?
Coutinho is all set to be the first person since 1990 to play for Liverpool and get a league winner's medal in the same season!
Liverpool were within a whisker of winning the league a few seasons ago
Remind us again what happened.....
It's an awful decision. We already ballsed up the season by failing to bring in VVD and Keita in the summer. Now we complete the hattrick of awful timing by selling our best player in january. Too many people around the club who think that next season things will fall into place.
They need to be mitigating this in january. Not necessarily with a like for like replacement mind. But the whispers of waiting till the summer doing the rounds right now are outrageous.
It's slipped my mind.
I've seen this a million times already and it's still funny!
Lolzerpool fans just don't have a sense of humour. And imagine going onto RAWK and dictating the terms of engagement re United????
I'm sure most of us do, but like with most jokes you can only hear the same one so many times before it stops being funny. The only funny part now is when they leave in the "I just realised" bit so as to look like they just thought of it. I suppose if you can't come up with anything original then knock yourselves out.
Literally adding insult to injury, Coutinho is indeed injured and out for 20 days rather than faking it
United were intensely scrutinised at the time of Ronaldo's sale, for the exact things that people are bringing up now. The difference was we were incredibly successful immediately beforehand and proved the scrutiny wrong by continuing to be successful after.
Had United dropped off and that "Wigan player" been shite then there might have been a point to be made.
Liverpool were within a whisker of winning the league a few seasons ago and followed that up by selling their best player and brightest prospect, replacing them with Southampton's best and a smattering of others. They dropped off a cliff.
Klopp came in and they fought tooth and nail to get back in the Champions League, and they've followed that up by selling their best player, replacing him (according to rumour) with a guy with worse numbers in an easier league and a defender from, er... Southampton.
Comparing United in the summer of 09 (a team fresh off the back of three successive title wins, a champions league win and second successive final) when we know they went on to win two league titles and reach a champions league final in the years that followed, to this Liverpool side (that have finished 6th, 8th and 4th in the last three seasons, with their only "success" being to lose two finals in a season in 2015/16 and win Arsenal's coveted top four trophy last season) is ridiculous.
United have won more in the 8 seasons since Ronaldo left in the summer of 09 than Liverpool have in the 16 since their "treble" in 00/01.
Now, Liverpool post-Coutinho may click and go on to bigger an better things and prove the scrutiny and criticisms wrong, however, the odds are somewhat stacked against them, while recent history shows that they're developing a bit of a habit of selling their best players when they look like they're on the right track, replacing them with lesser players, which I think is a perfectly fair and valid point.
Please tell me either how Liverpool were supposed to hold on to Coutinho or which player better than Lemar or Mahrez they are supposed to replace him with and you'll have a point.
Most teams are in the same position as I said if Barcelona or Real Madrid come running. They are snapping up said player because he's top class, and there are very few players around realistically available who are like-for-like in quality to replace them with.
United had the same with Ronaldo, they just managed to find success in spite of not properly replacing him as they had a good squad and an incredible manager. Liverpool are in the same boat, I hardly think they can be penalised for not going out and getting an Alexis Sanchez or a Paulo Dybala or a Gareth Bale, as none of them would want to join.
The best thing they can do with the Coutinho money is both find as good a replacement as possible AND fill in the gaps in the rest of their squad, both of which it seems they are attempting to do.
I don’t consider a club a selling club when they lose players to Barca or Madrid but when they lose them to direct rivals. Like when we lost Torres.The point is that they've yet again sold their best player when they looked like they might be on the up, and it's very likely to be a decision that sets them back a bit.
You cannot compare United at the time they sold Ronaldo to Liverpool now. United were and remained very successful, and had Ferguson in charge, a serial winner.
Liverpool have won nothing since 2012, and even then it was the League Cup, and you have to go back to the Champions League in 2005 for when they last won something that'd attract top players to the club. Klopp's won three trophies in his entire managerial career, and you have to go back to 2012 for the last of them (it's five and 2014 if you include the German equivalent of the Community Shield).
This isn't about whether Liverpool should or could have kept hold of Coutinho (although like when Suarez left he had not long signed a new, multi-year contract), it's simply about their best player leaving.
The fact that the money they received is not going to go on a like for like replacement because their simply isn't a player available that wants to join them just adds to this point. Liverpool are in a cycle of selling their best players (Torres, Suarez, Coutinho, Sterling) and having to settle for cheaper replacements in hope that they come good. The problem for them is, as soon as they come good, they too leave, starting the cycle all over again. There are already rumours of Real Madrid's interest in Salah.
I'm not suggesting that Liverpool should have done things differently, because as you said, there are very few clubs who can turn Barcelona away when they come knocking for one of their players. However, the point was that Liverpool are something of a selling club, and until one of their best players actually turns around and says, "I'm staying" when the likes of Real Madrid come calling, or they make a big signing off an established top club, they'll continue to buy from the Southamptons of the world and hope that the players they sign come good, before ultimately seeing them leave when they do.
We changed our system to allow another world class player to flourish and continued to be successful.
But by all means continue to equate the best manager of all time managing one of the best sides in Europe even without Ronaldo to your chap with his run of cup final defeats, trophyless seasons and a team that continues to rely on Jordan Henderson, Alberto Moreno, Dejan Lovren and Simon Mignolet.
I don’t consider a club a selling club when they lose players to Barca or Madrid but when they lose them to direct rivals. Like when we lost Torres.
When you lost Ronaldo you were getting to finals and had an insane team. And you STILL lost him. What more could you of done to keep him? The lure of those clubs is too great.
Sterling is the most recent example of us selling to direct rivals.
I don’t consider a club a selling club when they lose players to Barca or Madrid but when they lose them to direct rivals. Like when we lost Torres.
When you lost Ronaldo you were getting to finals and had an insane team. And you STILL lost him. What more could you of done to keep him? The lure of those clubs is too great.
Sterling is the most recent example of us selling to direct rivals.
What are you rivaling Man City for...?
Genuine question.