I love how the fact that Liverpool finished 7th and 28 points behind the same United squad the season before gets completely erased from memory. Moyes was to United as Hodgson was to Liverpool, all you can claim is that you now have Rodgers, but United now have a better manager in Van Gaal.
We've been pinging the ball about for fun in pre season playing the type of football we haven't seen in years in pre or competitive seasons so yes it's a massive positive for the team and manager, watch how important pre season becomes should you get a result on Monday
Finance, Liverpool aren't even in the same division here, any counter claim otherwise is just blind delusion. Your need to spend £135m is because you've a small squad (and just got 75m fir snappy
), built to cope with limited games, United (this season) can cope with a similarly small squad yet the club has already forked out £70m on first 11 improvements, our one major loss is Vidic as the other departures were all past their best and Evra aside fringe players, Evras replacement was probably the best LB in the league last year. Both Herrera and Shaw would walk into Liverpools first 11.
Liverpool May have gotten in more players but your first 11 has not been strengthened, any side you put out without a Suarez quality player in it is weaker, he made your midfield and all over attacking third stronger which last season was your strength.
As for quoting the Liverpool echo
Please don't talk about tunnel or biased vision and then quote the echo, a side with few weaknesses does not concede over 50 goals in a competitive season. If you had bothered to read the bullshit article you posted you might find the echo bigging up Liverpools pre season showings against Milan and City too.
As an aside I would take Mata and Kagawa over Lallana comfortably, it's actually more of a showing of Uniteds squad strength that Kagawa can't nail down a first team slot.