Injury is one, but also in the past McTominay used to play every second game. Back then we used to rotate McFred with Matic-Pogba, and it seemed like Scott needed more time to recover after a game.True, I imagine he'll be away one scott and Fred injury away from starting there.
Injury is one, but also in the past McTominay used to play every second game. Back then we used to rotate McFred with Matic-Pogba, and it seemed like Scott needed more time to recover after a game.
Van de Beek, Zidane or de Jong (if...) can take Fred place if he needs to recover, but in general he used to play almost every game for us.
But if McTom is out, our midfield is lacking that body.
This is why I've been banging all summer that we need Matic replacement. There is no scenario a DM isn't needed.
Martinez wasn't brought to be that DM, but since there is no talk about us getting another midfielder than de Jong, I expect Lisandro to end up in both CB and DM roles quite soon.
Exactly why I’m not a fan of either of them. Frenkie in that role and he turns and punishes their press.
Even Fred would to be honestExactly why I’m not a fan of either of them. Frenkie in that role and he turns and punishes their press.
Actually nobody is playing the holding role, but I don't see how it changes anything from my post?McTominay isn't playing the holding role, Fred is.
Actually nobody is playing the holding role, but I don't see how it changes anything from my post?
Fred might be the deepest player on paper/on heatmaps, but "holding" he is not.
Injury is one, but also in the past McTominay used to play every second game. Back then we used to rotate McFred with Matic-Pogba, and it seemed like Scott needed more time to recover after a game.
Van de Beek, Zidane or de Jong (if...) can take Fred place if he needs to recover, but in general he used to play almost every game for us.
But if McTom is out, our midfield is lacking that body.
This is why I've been banging all summer that we need Matic replacement. There is no scenario a DM isn't needed.
Martinez wasn't brought to be that DM, but since there is no talk about us getting another midfielder than de Jong, I expect Lisandro to end up in both CB and DM roles quite soon.
Matic is that sort of player you just described tbhETH's intention appears to be to play Fred or FDJ in the deepest midfield role as the connector between defence and attack with two more advanced midfielders ahead of them.
So you say there's no scenario where a DM isn't needed but ETH's midfield set-up quite literally doesn't have room for the type of DM I think you mean.
ETH's intention appears to be to play Fred or FDJ in the deepest midfield role as the connector between defence and attack with two more advanced midfielders ahead of them.
So you say there's no scenario where a DM isn't needed but ETH's midfield set-up quite literally doesn't have room for the type of DM I think you mean.
Connector when in possession, Defensive Midfielder out of possession (sounds like a younger Matic?). How else are we going to accommodate two AMs on the pitch at the same time?ETH's intention appears to be to play Fred or FDJ in the deepest midfield role as the connector between defence and attack with two more advanced midfielders ahead of them.
So you say there's no scenario where a DM isn't needed but ETH's midfield set-up quite literally doesn't have room for the type of DM I think you mean.
I believe it's a huge risk if we are going to play with two AMs in front of him (and by him I mean De Jong, because I've never heard of any other players being mentioned in that position).I think I argued this with the @Borys yesterday. Ten Hag clearly doesn’t want to bring in the profile of midfielder some supporters think we need. They might disagree, and that’s fine, but they are going to have to accept that this is what’s happening.
Matic is that sort of player you just described tbh
Actually nobody is playing the holding role, but I don't see how it changes anything from my post?
Fred might be the deepest player on paper/on heatmaps, but "holding" he is not.
I see your point, I think we agree mostly. I ideal world we get a let's call it a holding midfieler (de Jong) and pair him with a supporting midfielder (Fred >> van de Beek/McTominay). Option B would be in that case McTominay-Fred midfield duo, as average as it is, that's the only proven and functional midfield that would probably get us into top 4 (if we could play them week-in/week-out, which we can't). Contrary to popular belief, it's not McFred that failed us badly last season, although it's far from what is required.Deepest/ holding - you know what I meant so no need for pedantry.
I find your post contradictory. Fred has been playing as the deepest midfielder, that is the position we lost Matic for and the position we are looking to get de Jong for. I agree we need that player. McTominay has been playing as the second function midfielder and it's his best position. That's also Fred's best position so he can play there, as can Van de Beek, Eriksen and Mejbri. You mentioned Zidane - is that not his position too? And Mejbri? I don't see how we need a body to cover for McTominay being out?
Man city? If you've been watching the way we set up in Preseason, its actually a lot easier for the holding midfielder than it was for both Mcfred previously because of the Press and the use of the fullback as inverted fullbacks and the positioning of the center backs being high. The shape is quite compact so you're not defending a large amount of territory, it more about positioning (which is well coached within the structure).Connector when in possession, Defensive Midfielder out of possession (sounds like a younger Matic?). How else are we going to accommodate two AMs on the pitch at the same time?
I believe it's a huge risk if we are going to play with two AMs in front of him (and by him I mean De Jong, because I've never heard of any other players being mentioned in that position).
I am afraid this setup will be a complete train wreck in EPL, as we've learned already only industrial midfield (McFred) can be functional in current United side, and now we're going to make it the exact opposite and make it super lightweight. I can't recall any team which plays holding + two no10s, do you? I believe we will be good on the ball, but I also keep thinking what happens when we don't have the ball?
Anyway, ETH might have an idea to make it work so I'm very curious how this goes. Expectations are low anyway so that's the right time for experiments.
Yes ManCity, with Rodri + Silva&de Bruyne or Rodri + Gundogan (CM). MC can do it because a) their AMs are extremely good at keeping possession (Bruno is the exact opposite) and b) their forwards contribute far far more defensively than ours.Man city? If you've been watching the way we set up in Preseason, its actually a lot easier for the holding midfielder than it was for both Mcfred previously because of the Press and the use of the fullback as inverted fullbacks and the positioning of the center backs being high. The shape is quite compact so you're not defending a large amount of territory, it more about positioning (which is well coached within the structure).
Bruno is as good at keeping possession as De bruyne is, and is more hard working than De bruyne, Eriksen also cover a lot of ground as well. The issue about keeping possession is more on the structure and tactics something we are seeing us do in our current fixtures...its pre season but the ATM game for example had more tempo than that community shield.Yes ManCity, with Rodri + Silva&de Bruyne or Rodri + Gundogan (CM). MC can do it because a) their AMs are extremely good at keeping possession (Bruno is the exact opposite) and b) their forwards contribute far far more defensively than ours.
This can be done, but not with Bruno and Ronaldo/Martial/Rashford/Sancho.
I strongly disagree about the bolded part, and I don't take anything from pre-season which we played mostly the same setup as last season, but sure let's give it time.Bruno is as good at keeping possession as De bruyne is, and is more hard working than De bruyne, Eriksen also cover a lot of ground as well. The issue about keeping possession is more on the structure and tactics something we are seeing us do in our current fixtures...its pre season but the ATM game for example had more tempo than that community shield.
Its not pre season even in our non pressing/ non possession set up under Ole go look it up.I strongly disagree about the bolded part, and I don't take anything from pre-season which we played mostly the same setup as last season, but sure let's give it time.
I see your point, I think we agree mostly. I ideal world we get a let's call it a holding midfieler (de Jong) and pair him with a supporting midfielder (Fred >> van de Beek/McTominay). Option B would be in that case McTominay-Fred midfield duo, as average as it is, that's the only proven and functional midfield that would probably get us into top 4 (if we could play them week-in/week-out, which we can't). Contrary to popular belief, it's not McFred that failed us badly last season, although it's far from what is required.
I would love to see de Jong-Fred behind Eriksen, that would be a really really good midfield for most games, with McFred-McTominay behind Bruno as a backup. To be honest I don't think we can expect anything more at this point for next season midfield options.
I just strongly oppose the idea of playing de Jong behind Eriksen and Bruno, what seems to be the main idea on the forum.
That is obviously a big IF fdj joins, and as I don't see much happening there, as things stand Martinez in DM is still on the cards.
On a scale of 1 to 10 how well does he play in midfield.
Or just assuming our new signing will be playing alongside the captain? doesn't take a rocket scientist.The leaks are still there
Paul Scholes mixed with Gabriel Heinze
It pains me that he legitimately deserves to start ahead of Varane. We were supposed to be signing a WC and multiple CL winning Rolls Royce of a CB. Instead we ended up with an injury prone Titus Bramble tribute act.It pains me to see Maguire possibly still starting
It pains me that he legitimately deserves to start ahead of Varane. We were supposed to be signing a WC and multiple CL winning Rolls Royce of a CB. Instead we ended up with an injury prone Titus Bramble tribute act.
I was very excited about Varane’s transfer.. I really hope he turns it around this season! I’m not writing him off yet!
That's actually a good point even if I disagree with it. Maguire doesn't deserve to start any more than Varane IMHO but him being captain gives him some room. Varane has been a dud though that's without a doubtIt pains me that he legitimately deserves to start ahead of Varane. We were supposed to be signing a WC and multiple CL winning Rolls Royce of a CB. Instead we ended up with an injury prone Titus Bramble tribute act.
Leak?I'm excited to see him start with Maguire if the leak is true. I got tired of Lindelof's ultra passive style of defending towards the end of last season but I think I just want to see a different combination than Maguire and Lindelof. As i've said before , we have four first choice centre backs for their respective countries. There must be a good combo in there somewhere.
Excited to see him if true!
Sorry, rumour is more accurate.Leak?
Unfortunately he can't stay fit long enough to build any kind of form. Maguire and Martinez will be the starting two for most games this season.
Can you share? Must have missed itSorry, rumour is more accurate.
Can you share? Must have missed it
Excited to see him if true!