Very clever Vuc (if you did that on purpose 
)
)Lionel Messi
- Thread starter cesc's_mullet
- Start date
- Status
How are you supposed to deal with Henry, Eto'o, Messi, Xavi, Iniesta and Alves in this sort of form?
'Only Malaga', they're 2 points off a Champions League place.
Jesus 6-0, barcelona are ripping them to shreds
and it doesn't matter who you do it against when he's been doing it the entire season
Vijay, shit poster that you are, this is trully awful.
Xavi's been the best player on the pitch today.
2nd best player in the world.
2nd best player in the world.
He's brilliant, isn't he?
He's Vijay.
Xavi and Iniesta when they play together on top form are a lesson of passing the ball.
Is the Nou Camp pitch as big as OT's?
You'd need to check the real measures but I'd think the Nou Camp pitch is bigger
For some reason I read that as the second best player on the pitch. Was about to say "No, the best."
Well, just because I read it wrong shouldnt deprive Xavi of deserved plaudits. So I'll post it anyway.
Old Trafford - 105 x 68 m
Camp Nou - 105m x 68 m
Same size apparently.
Camp Nou - 105m x 68 m
Same size apparently.
With Messi first or third?
according to other sites it's 105X72(Camp nou)
I think these are the correct dimensions.
I think these are the correct dimensions.
1. Manchester City, City of Manchester Stadium, 116 x 77 yards, 8932
2. Manchester United, Old Trafford, 116 x 76 yards, 8816
3. Blackburn Rovers, Ewood Park, 115 x 76 yards, 8740
4. Everton, Goodison Park, 112 x 78 yards, 8736
5. Aston Villa, Villa Park, 114 x 75 yards, 8550
6. Middlesbrough, Riverside, 114 x 75 yards, 8550
7. Arsenal, Emirates Stadium, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
8. Derby County, Pride Park, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
9. Reading, Madjeski Stadium, 111 x 76 yards, 8436
10. Sunderland, Stadium of Light, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
11. Wigan Athletic, JJB Stadium, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
12. Portsmouth, Fratton Park, 115 x 73 yards, 8395
13. Chelsea, Stamford Bridge, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
14. Fulham, Craven Cottage, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
15. Liverpool, Anfield, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
16. Birmingham City, St. Andrews, 110 x 74 yards, 8140
17. Newcastle United, St. James’s Park, 110 x 73 yards, 8030
18. Tottenham Hotspur, White Hart Lane, 110 x 73 yards, 8030
19. Bolton Wanderers, Reebok Stadium, 110 x 72 yards, 7920
20. West Ham United, Boleyn Ground, 110 x 70 yards, 7700
2. Manchester United, Old Trafford, 116 x 76 yards, 8816
3. Blackburn Rovers, Ewood Park, 115 x 76 yards, 8740
4. Everton, Goodison Park, 112 x 78 yards, 8736
5. Aston Villa, Villa Park, 114 x 75 yards, 8550
6. Middlesbrough, Riverside, 114 x 75 yards, 8550
7. Arsenal, Emirates Stadium, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
8. Derby County, Pride Park, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
9. Reading, Madjeski Stadium, 111 x 76 yards, 8436
10. Sunderland, Stadium of Light, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
11. Wigan Athletic, JJB Stadium, 114 x 74 yards, 8436
12. Portsmouth, Fratton Park, 115 x 73 yards, 8395
13. Chelsea, Stamford Bridge, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
14. Fulham, Craven Cottage, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
15. Liverpool, Anfield, 110 x 75 yards, 8250
16. Birmingham City, St. Andrews, 110 x 74 yards, 8140
17. Newcastle United, St. James’s Park, 110 x 73 yards, 8030
18. Tottenham Hotspur, White Hart Lane, 110 x 73 yards, 8030
19. Bolton Wanderers, Reebok Stadium, 110 x 72 yards, 7920
20. West Ham United, Boleyn Ground, 110 x 70 yards, 7700
Cheers.
Thought so, but wasn't sure.
They use width as well as we used to.
Quite annoying to watch in that sense.
They better thrash the Scousers in the semis.
That definitely factors into the FSW's tactics in European home games.
It looks bigger on TV for some reason. Maybe has something to do with the height of the TV cameras.
Massive pitch.
Villa are only 3pts off a CL place, they didn't look too clever today, did they?
Messi first of course.
I'm not sure who'd be third, on the basis of this season.
Suppose Vidic could be up there.
David Villa too, maybe.
No, they were crap.
Does that make them a bad team?
It was a brilliant performance from Liverpool just like it was a brilliant performance from Barcelona, that's how it is.
Saying it was 'only Malaga' or 'only Villa' would be bizarre.
I'd be delighted with a 1-0 win against Villa as it is.
I really love watching Barca play but this season it just keeps making me think to myself 'why cant we play like that?' I genuinely believe we have as good players as them. Berbatov, Tevez, Rooney, Ronaldo, Scholes, Giggs, Carrick, Anderson, Nani, Park.. its a stunning array of talent. But while Barca's attack is playing awesome stuff, we are falling well beyond of what we're capable of.
It feels weird because i know our defence is twice as good as theirs.
It feels weird because i know our defence is twice as good as theirs.
Spanish teams try to attack, and can't defend. English teams try to defend and can't attack.
If we played in La Liga we'd rip teams apart as well.
Of course it was a brilliant performance, but obviously the opposition has a lot to do with the result.
Clearly the Scousers' result last week was more impressive than this, non?
feck off, if your name is cal?. feck off, if your name is cal?. feck off, if your name is cal?. feck OFF, IF YOUR NAME IS CAL?
Yes.
But if it's a brilliant performance, against any team, then you shouldn't have to talk it down by saying 'it's only Malaga'.
It'd make more sense if you said 'it's only Osasuna', or something of the like, but not Malaga.
Those are the right measurements, I think. Maximum allowed in the CL is 105 x 68 metres
It's a brilliant performance, but it IS only Malaga...
I don't see what the problem is, Malaga aren't exactly a great team, are they?
Im actually glad we didnt try and sign Daniel Alves.
he's better than modric.
A brilliant performance is a brilliant performance.
Malaga are a good team.
If we won 6-0 against Villa we'd be over the moon, we wouldn't be saying 'well, to be fair, it's only Villa'.
Why? He's brilliant.
Use ignore function.
feck off, if your name is cal?
- Status