FCBarca
Mes que un Rag
Ray Hudson
I've always thought if Di Stefano has won the World Cup, he would be straight up there with Maradona and Pele for the no.1 spot, instead of just behind them for no.3.
Yes that wanker. I posted about him on the Worst Commentator thread. fecking hate him. I would rather watch a game in Spanish than listen to that useless fat bastard.
Di Stefano is no Messi though.
Why the hate? I find him entertaining and funny.
Wrong. If a player is from small nation, he won't be held to the same standard in international football as those from nations that can win world and continental cups with ease.
He will simply be judged on how well he played for his nation instead.
The bottom line is the world cup is what separates the greats from each other. Club football is a comfort zone for the best. For the best are largely placed in teams built around them, geared strictly for their success. In international football their own skills, ability to inspire and lead are tested much more. For they have to rely on their great array of skill and talent to get ahead with their teams.
PS: Maradona could never have been as devastating as Messi simply because he was never a center forward at any point in his career, nor did he have his game geared to getting goals as the main means to kill off opponents.
Also, if the World Cup is the real measure for how good a player is, then I don't know why is there much debate about who's better, Maradona or Pele. Looks like an easy question to me. 3 > 1.
Funny? He should be no where near the commentator's box. How could you possibly find him entertaining? Commentary is not for everyone. And it is certainly not for him.
Pelé had slightly better team mates in fairness, and really he himself only won two World Cups.
Ray covers the sport like an enthusiastic kid and he expresses the same sort of enthusiasm regardless of who is playing. Despite being a self professed Madridista, the Geordie does show a lot of joy in watching Barcelona
For me it's refreshing to have different type of commentators, not the same boring shit. He's unique in that respect, and I like his enthusiasm and sometimes he does crack me up with his metaphors.
I'm not sure I understand the point. No-one's saying he needs to win 3 World Cups like Pelé or take them to consecutive World Cup finals like Maradona, they're just saying that questions will be asked if he's unable to show anything like his best form at international level. If he stars in a tournament but his team-mates let him down then it'll shut up most of the critics, I don't see how that's unfair in any way.
People are talking about "winning" the World Cup, not showing up.
Also, he has proved that he can perform with his national team (when he's played in the right role).. However the World Cup is IMO too small a field to be able to judge a player.. It's all about how Messi will play in those 3 weeks. And then he will only get another chance when he's 30.
Do you know that Rooney hasn't even scored a single goal in the World Cup? I mean even Heskey did! Should we judge them based on that?
People are talking about "winning" the World Cup, not showing up.
Also, he has proved that he can perform with his national team (when he's played in the right role).. However the World Cup is IMO too small a field to be able to judge a player.. It's all about how Messi will play in those 3 weeks. And then he will only get another chance when he's 30.
Do you know that Rooney hasn't even scored a single goal in the World Cup? I mean even Heskey did! Should we judge them based on that?
Messi has only 13 goals in competitive internationals.
He has only scored 2 goals in the Copa América finals.
His international record isnt great at all. Its the only weakness that anybody can point to in the debate on his greatness.
Wrong. If a player is from small nation, he won't be held to the same standard in international football as those from nations that can win world and continental cups with ease.
He will simply be judged on how well he played for his nation instead.
The bottom line is the world cup is what separates the greats from each other. Club football is a comfort zone for the best. For the best are largely placed in teams built around them, geared strictly for their success. In international football their own skills, ability to inspire and lead are tested much more. For they have to rely on their great array of skill and talent to get ahead with their teams.
PS: Maradona could never have been as devastating as Messi simply because he was never a center forward at any point in his career, nor did he have his game geared to getting goals as the main means to kill off opponents.
It really is that simple. He's already lost the battle when Messi slowed it down and took him head on. Insane acceleration there. It's the perfect finish but because it's Messi it's barely even impressive any more.He was dangerous, he used to score against us often. We had to be very well organised; put pressure on him, doubling up, tripling up even to limit his talents. Because if it was one-on-one, you'd lose.
Based on what?So Xavi > Maradona?
Cannavaro did deserve it. He won his domestic league and was key in a world cup win in a world cup year.And Cannavaro should win BPITW in 2006??
Which would still make you wrong. Pele and Maradona didn't get lucky to perform and win a world cup by being the key player. Neither did men like Cruyff, Platini or Zidane who shone at world cups without winning them.If you're calling the club football the "comfort zone" for the great players, then I'm calling the World Cup the "lucky zone" for players who "hit form at the right moment, and get a little lucky".
That is because you simply don't understand the arguments being made. The argument is the greats are separated by how well they have done at international level and at world cups.Also, if the World Cup is the real measure for how good a player is, then I don't know why is there much debate about who's better, Maradona or Pele. Looks like an easy question to me.
The thing is, Leo almost routinely goes to his left, as well. So as a defender, even shepherding him to his right doesn't give you the advantage you'd imagine. And that lob over the keeper, has anyone used that more than he has?
I do enjoy the relationships/friendships he strikes with opposing keepers as well. There's massive respect even at the end of big matches between them. Abbiatti, for example, came over for a handshake with Leo with a big grin at the end of the match the other night
No. You simply misunderstand their arguments.People are talking about "winning" the World Cup, not showing up
He was played in the right role at the Copa America and was utterly awful.Also, he has proved that he can perform with his national team (when he's played in the right role)..
That is why people repeatedly talk of international football. International football is not only the world cup. It has more than enough games to judge any player on.Also the World Cup is IMO too small a field to be able to judge a player..
One of the reasons why he wont ever be considered amongst the football greats. If he doesn't sort it out.....Do you know that Rooney hasn't even scored a single goal in the World Cup?
I'm convinced he is the best at lobbing the ball in football history.I have never seen anyone who uses so much and so efficiently.Messi chips the ball over keepers while running at a high pace, the control it takes to do that consistently is crazy.He can even do it on his right foot
No. You simply misunderstand their arguments.
He was played in the right role at the Copa America and was utterly awful.
That is why people repeatedly talk of international football. International football is not only the world cup. It has more than enough games to judge any player on.
One of the reasons why he wont ever be considered amongst the football greats. If he doesn't sort it out.....
The only people who believe international football is outdated/irrelevant largely reside in the British isles and small pockets of Europe. Most of the world doesn't share that view. If Messi doesn't have a single international tournament in which he really imposes himself, and possibly wins as a result. Only his fan bois will consider him greater than Pele and Maradona.Not sure about that.
He already is, a huge number of people regularly talk of him as the greatest footballer to have played the sport and that includes many old timers who have seen the rest. He might not be considered to be up there by yourself, but you'll be in the minority. Especially with international football becoming less prestigious and a bigger bore with each passing year.
The only people who believe international football is outdated/irrelevant largely reside in the British isles and small pockets of Europe. Most of the world doesn't share that view. If Messi doesn't have a single international tournament in which he really imposes himself, and possibly wins as a result. Only his fan bois will consider him greater than Pele and Maradona.
Not sure about that.
He already is, a huge number of people regularly talk of him as the greatest footballer to have played the sport and that includes many old timers who have seen the rest. He might not be considered to be up there by yourself, but you'll be in the minority. Especially with international football becoming less prestigious and a bigger bore with each passing year.
It's easy to do great things in possibly the greatest club side ever. Many would like to see if he can replicate his club success when he isn't surrounded with Xavi, Iniesta and co. He needs to win a world-cup to prove the doubters wrong, just like Pele & Maradona did. Until then, he's not quite there.
Easy, sure. Alexis Sanchez thought so too
It's easy to do great things in possibly the greatest club side ever. Many would like to see if he can replicate his club success when he isn't surrounded with Xavi, Iniesta and co. He needs to win a world-cup to prove the doubters wrong, just like Pele & Maradona did. Until then, he's not quite there.
Not sure about that.
He already is, a huge number of people regularly talk of him as the greatest footballer to have played the sport and that includes many old timers who have seen the rest. He might not be considered to be up there by yourself, but you'll be in the minority. Especially with international football becoming less prestigious and a bigger bore with each passing year.