Gehrman
Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 12,029
I wonder why. Here's where Pochettino makes him play :
He's on the RW?
I wonder why. Here's where Pochettino makes him play :
He's on the RW?
Not only RW but sticking to the line when we bought Hakimi ffs, this is borderline criminal.
Messi's lust for goals would mean he will play more goals, he is not going to sit quietly if he doesn't win the Golden Shoe.He's not the player he was but it's obvious his season basically counts only 12-14 games at best now. 2 in cups + 7-8 in CL (if they reach finals in all 3) and maybe 3-4 away matches in Ligue 1. Didn't Neymar only played in 45-50% of all PSG games since he joined them? It's a comedy club, let's be honest here. And in the end Messi joining PSG will have absolutely zero impact for L1.
Messi's lust for goals would mean he will play more goals, he is not going to sit quietly if he doesn't win the Golden Shoe.
Feels like Pochettino should be using him as a false 9 the same way Liverpool use firmino. Messi should be center of their attack and mbappe and neymar as inverted forward until they get a proper no.9 to replace mbappe. Even though his stats has been more impressive as a rw for psg, I feel like he should be dictating the attacking play. But what do I know. It seems like psg is doing well, so maybe my input is wrong.
It is not about him wanting to score all the goals, but Messi is always a goal first, pass second type of player, kinda like how Pele or Zico were. So he will be playing every match and try to score in every game, he is not selfish, but he is very motivated for goals.He had zero problems with his own teammate Suarez when he won it in 2016 as far as I can recall.
Xavi alone had more talent in his weak foot than Verrati+Herrera+Gueye+Wijjaldum combined, and Veratti is a great player himself.Dont think they are doing that well. They are still at least two levels below Barca 2010-2011 or other similar legendary clubs from the past, and i feel that with the names they have on that squad, they should absolutely be playing a football at least close as good enough as those clubs played.
They have everything to do it, especially a Messi that is still performing at around an 80-90% of his best self, surrounded by top talents of all time as well. They shouldnt be struggling that much TBH, and Messi should 100% be playing as a playmaker rather than a winger.
Xavi alone had more talent in his weak foot than Verrati+Herrera+Gueye+Wijjaldum combined, and Veratti is a great player himself.
And while Villa + Pedro might not seem as glamorous as Mbappe+Neymar, they were willing to run their bollocks off to bring the best out of Messi.
They should be doing better, but to suggest that the names they have is anywhere near that Barca 09-12 side or should perform at a similar level is nonsensical.
It is not about him wanting to score all the goals, but Messi is always a goal first, pass second type of player, kinda like how Pele or Zico were. So he will be playing every match and try to score in every game, he is not selfish, but he is very motivated for goals.
I don't think this is true at all. If that was the case, he wouldn't have dropped deeper and deeper every season.
Him dropping deeper, never changed his approach to goal scoring, he despite dropping still had one of the highest shots per games.Yeah that makes no sense tbh.
Xavi alone had more talent in his weak foot than Verrati+Herrera+Gueye+Wijjaldum combined, and Veratti is a great player himself.
And while Villa + Pedro might not seem as glamorous as Mbappe+Neymar, they were willing to run their bollocks off to bring the best out of Messi.
They should be doing better, but to suggest that the names they have is anywhere near that Barca 09-12 side or should perform at a similar level is nonsensical.
Him dropping deeper, never changed his approach to goal scoring, he despite dropping still had one of the highest shots per games.
Messi has a motivated approach about goals and golden shoes, saying it as it is, is nothing wrong or silly.
I said that with the players PSG has, they should be playing at least "close" to the level that some clubs from the past, including but not limited to Barcelona 2010. Thats where the bar is set in terms of football standards, but there are other teams like Barcelona 2014-2015, Guardiola's Bayern, Zidane's Madrid etc that fit that description of legendary teams from the past that this current PSG is light years away from reaching or even getting close to. They are two, or even three levels below those clubs.
Imagine if Guardiola became PSG's coach tomorrow. You dont think they could reach a similar level to those clubs? I dont think its nonsensical to expect a team that has by far the best front three in the world, who is also supported by a bunch of copa america/euros winners behind them, to play a football close to the level of those aforementioned teams.
Maybe we're talking about two different things. He has ambitions towards golden boots etc. and takes many shots but what we mean is that he's rarely taking them when there is a (slightly) better positioned player which is a habit of many successful goal scorers (Salah, Cristiano, Mbappe etc.). It's not his highest priority which also shows in his positioning and the way he contributes. I mean, I don't know if there is a pre assist statistic available but I'm sure he would be leading it over more or less any period >1y. It also is reflected in his xGBuildUp (xG involvement without own shots) which is among the best (higher than de Bruyne, Bruno, Sancho and Thomas Müller last season and on par with Neymar). He's at 0.6, Salah for instance was at 0.3.
If Guardiola took them over, he would probably cut away a few big names. Don't forget what he did with Ronaldinho, Deco and Eto'o. He needs hard working players, too, and wouldn't accept players not doimg what they're asked to. You can't create special roles with less defensive duties for three stars, you have to be realistic. Many players at Barca who were stars were "degraded" to complementary players, like David Silva, Henry, Fabregas Ibrahimovic or Sanchez.
It is definitely a valid question if Messi's choice of club was the well thought through if his priority is winning the CL one or two last times.
But do you think Guardiola could have PSG playing CL champions quality football? Like current Liverpool play right now, City, Mid 2010's Bayern etc.
I think for sure he would.
This is what I said back in August when the signing came through.I said that with the players PSG has, they should be playing at least "close" to the level that some clubs from the past, including but not limited to Barcelona 2010. Thats where the bar is set in terms of football standards, but there are other teams like Barcelona 2014-2015, Guardiola's Bayern, Zidane's Madrid etc that fit that description of legendary teams from the past that this current PSG is light years away from reaching or even getting close to. They are two, or even three levels below those clubs.
Imagine if Guardiola became PSG's coach tomorrow. You dont think they could reach a similar level to those clubs? I dont think its nonsensical to expect a team that has by far the best front three in the world, who is also supported by a bunch of copa america/euros winners behind them, to play a football close to the level of those aforementioned teams.
I’m absolutely not convinced at all that any coach can fit the current Messi, Neymar and Mbappe into the same team and not get massively out worked in crunch fixtures. Claims of CL are premature.
Gonna be weird, a bit surreal even, to see him in a PSG shirt though.
This is what I said back in August when the signing came through.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/lionel-messi-signs-for-psg.464567/page-21#post-27586953
The reasoning was what @Zehner already laid out above, but in addition to that, if you look at their actual quality on the ball, their midfield is stratospheres behind any of the great team of the past two decades. Milan? Utd 08? Chelsea 05 (and they hardly played pretty football), Barca I already mentioned, even for their 14/15 team they started Biscuits Iniesta Rakitic in midfield, Real (Casemiro-Kroos-Modric), Bayern 13 (Javier Martinez, Schweinsteinger, Kroos, Muller), so on and so forth, you get the idea.
And all those teams had great attacking players who worked like dogs for the team too, so you need both a blend of quality and work rate across your midfield and attack to play great football. Or in extreme case like Dortmund (even though they were no slouches themselves), you compensate for the relative lack of quality by even more work rate from everybody. PSG have attacking players that won’t work/run/press and midfield players who are mediocre on the ball bar one, so why exactly should they be playing champagne football?
If Pep can do anything for that team, it will be by instilling a system better suited to Messi and requiring the other forwards to do more off the ball, but there’s a limit to what he can do. Took him a season and a gazillion in transfer to get Man City to play to the standard he wanted.
This is what I said back in August when the signing came through.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/lionel-messi-signs-for-psg.464567/page-21#post-27586953
The reasoning was what @Zehner already laid out above, but in addition to that, if you look at their actual quality on the ball, their midfield is stratospheres behind any of the great team of the past two decades. Milan? Utd 08? Chelsea 05 (and they hardly played pretty football), Barca I already mentioned, even for their 14/15 team they started Biscuits Iniesta Rakitic in midfield, Real (Casemiro-Kroos-Modric), Bayern 13 (Javier Martinez, Schweinsteinger, Kroos, Muller), so on and so forth, you get the idea.
And all those teams had great attacking players who worked like dogs for the team too, so you need both a blend of quality and work rate across your midfield and attack to play great football. Or in extreme case like Dortmund (even though they were no slouches themselves), you compensate for the relative lack of quality by even more work rate from everybody. PSG have attacking players that won’t work/run/press and midfield players who are mediocre on the ball bar one, so why exactly should they be playing champagne football?
If Pep can do anything for that team, it will be by instilling a system better suited to Messi and requiring the other forwards to do more off the ball, but there’s a limit to what he can do. Took him a season and a gazillion in transfer to get Man City to play to the standard he wanted.
Very true, the only team we could roughly be compared with is 14/15 Barcelona and still, Busquets, Iniesta and Rakitic were MILES better than Verratti (who is injured half the time) Gueye and Herrera. On top of that, they had prime Alba and Dani Alves (we have Hakimi but Nuno Mendes is still very far from Alba at that time).
People sometimes have a heart time understanding that midfielders are the heart of the team (even if you need good team performances).
To be fair, on paper a midfield consisting of Verratti and Wijnaldum is pretty dope. Especially if you have in mind that they could be joined by Marquinhos as a DM if Kimpembe and Ramos are the CB pairing. The Hakimi-Messi combo on the right has also much potential as Messi loves to vacate the wing anyway while Hakimi is similar to Dani Alves in his positional orientation. Add to that a more defensive LB (Abidal) and the setup looks pretty similar. IMO it all stands and falls with the work rate of Neymar and Mbappe. I also think that playing Herrera and Gueye is a testament to that.
You are trying to have perfection before you expect performance. There is no team that is perfect. That Liverpool side that conquered Europe played with Wijnaldum, Henderson and Fabinho for much of the campaign. City do not have an out and out striker but these teams function ever so well. With the level of talent in PSG you guys should be operating on a very high level.It wouldn't change the fact that Verratti (who's a very fragile player and misses a lot of games because of it, he's out for 1 month atm) would be the only creative player in the midfield. Marquinhos would be great defensively but when you play against high pressing teams that requires quality on the ball to get out of, you need players that will actually do something good when the receive a pass. Wijnaldum is limited, so are the others. My opinion would change a lot if we had at least ONE other good midfielder but we don't. We didn't need Messi, Ramos or Donnarumma, we needed a world class midfielder, so did United and we see what happened when you're under pressure with poor midfielders against a good team this very week end. Ours isn't ManUnited bad, but it still isn't up to the top teams.
You are trying to have perfection before you expect performance. There is no team that is perfect. That Liverpool side that conquered Europe played with Wijnaldum, Henderson and Fabinho for much of the campaign. City do not have an out and out striker but these teams function ever so well. With the level of talent in PSG you guys should be operating on a very high level.
These teams work well, because their players all work well. With a front 3 that thinks otherwise, any midfield in the world would struggle.
You are trying to have perfection before you expect performance. There is no team that is perfect. That Liverpool side that conquered Europe played with Wijnaldum, Henderson and Fabinho for much of the campaign. City do not have an out and out striker but these teams function ever so well. With the level of talent in PSG you guys should be operating on a very high level.
Defensively they would, the production on offense is a very different story. At the moment, PSG struggles defensively AND on offense. Gueye or Herrera loosing the ball under pressure is not because of the front 3 not working well, actually Neymar very often has to come low on the pitch to offer an alternative when he should not have to. It's FAR too easy to press high against PSG. Block Verratti, give little space to Hakimi and you're good, the team is stuck because there's no other quality option.
I really don't think this analysis is based on real world football. Henderson and Fabinho are really good players, far superior to Herrera/Gueye. They also played with TAA walking on water and a really good Robertson. City doesn't have a striker, yes, but they have enough quality to bring the ball close to the opponent's box so they find a solution eventually. I'm not trying to have perfection, I could accept one average full back like Bayern, or trading Messi against a player like Koman or Bernardo, but no-one can ever make me believe that you can be a consistant high level team with only half a Verratti in the midfield and a whole bunch of average players struggling on the ball. It just doesn't exist.
I really don't think people here realise how important it is to have quality midfielders. It's a ManUnited forum, they should.
You are trying to have perfection before you expect performance. There is no team that is perfect. That Liverpool side that conquered Europe played with Wijnaldum, Henderson and Fabinho for much of the campaign. City do not have an out and out striker but these teams function ever so well. With the level of talent in PSG you guys should be operating on a very high level.
I’d say that is true, the issue is that we have a very radical example of how a player motivated by scoring goals can look like as the first comparison to Messi on anything.I don't think this is true at all. If that was the case, he wouldn't have dropped deeper and deeper every season.
These teams work well, because their players all work well. With a front 3 that thinks otherwise, any midfield in the world would struggle.
I maintain my initial point that the PSG side is seriously underperforming when you look at the level of talent in it. If Poch gets hooked and another manager comes around and he gets Neymar and Mbappe at least to work a lot harder, he would get the benefits of having better work rate compared to the Poch era and results will likely be better. This PSG side that I have had the opportunity to watch even when Veratti plays lacks a team cohesion that would unlock the abilities and make the sum of the parts greater than the individual parts. Even if we assume that Hendo and Fabinho is a superior midfield to Herrera and Wijnadlum, let’s remember that the latter was a mainstay for Liverpool all through this time there. TAA become who he is through coaching and there is nothing stopping Hakimi to go on and do greater things. The example I gave about City just highlights my point that there is hardly a perfect team. If you can carry the ball to opposition goal but can hardly finish, you are on the same boat as the guy you can turn a half chance to gold even when the supply is limited. You have three of the worlds bestDefensively they would, the production on offense is a very different story. At the moment, PSG struggles defensively AND on offense. Gueye or Herrera loosing the ball under pressure is not because of the front 3 not working well, actually Neymar very often has to come low on the pitch to offer an alternative when he should not have to. It's FAR too easy to press high against PSG. Block Verratti, give little space to Hakimi and you're good, the team is stuck because there's no other quality option.
I really don't think this analysis is based on real world football. Henderson and Fabinho are really good players, far superior to Herrera/Gueye. They also played with TAA walking on water and a really good Robertson. City doesn't have a striker, yes, but they have enough quality to bring the ball close to the opponent's box so they find a solution eventually. I'm not trying to have perfection, I could accept one average full back like Bayern, or trading Messi against a player like Koman or Bernardo, but no-one can ever make me believe that you can be a consistant high level team with only half a Verratti in the midfield and a whole bunch of average players struggling on the ball. It just doesn't exist.
I really don't think people here realise how important it is to have quality midfielders. It's a ManUnited forum, they should.
I maintain my initial point that the PSG side is seriously underperforming when you look at the level of talent in it. If Poch gets hooked and another manager comes around and he gets Neymar and Mbappe at least to work a lot harder, he would get the benefits of having better work rate compared to the Poch era and results will likely be better. This PSG side that I have had the opportunity to watch even when Veratti plays lacks a team cohesion that would unlock the abilities and make the sum of the parts greater than the individual parts. Even if we assume that Hendo and Fabinho is a superior midfield to Herrera and Wijnadlum, let’s remember that the latter was a mainstay for Liverpool all through this time there. TAA become who he is through coaching and there is nothing stopping Hakimi to go on and do greater things. The example I gave about City just highlights my point that there is hardly a perfect team. If you can carry the ball to opposition goal but can hardly finish, you are on the same boat as the guy you can turn a half chance to gold even when the supply is limited. You have three of the worlds best
The issue with the team for me is too many egos in front and the manger’s profile not sufficient to get them to do exactly as he wants but this is not a problem of quality at all. The quality in that team is quite rich but unfortunately football is a team sport.