rumac
Full Member
I'm not commenting on your intelligence, just that if you'd asked me to guess a list of right wing whataboutisms, you've come out with most of them in this thread.Nah, I just have a brain.
I'm not commenting on your intelligence, just that if you'd asked me to guess a list of right wing whataboutisms, you've come out with most of them in this thread.Nah, I just have a brain.
It's good mate. Otherwise this thread would have an insight of a sweaty sock.I'm not commenting on your intelligence, just that if you'd asked me to guess a list of right wing whataboutisms, you've come out with most of them in this thread.
What's the lecture that you're unhappy to receive?Why do the elites want to lecture me even during football matches? Stop it please.
If you have a brain why all the whataboutisms?Nah, I just have a brain.
Maybe because I can see past one spectrum? Or do not divide people on far-right and braindead lefts?If you have a brain why all the whataboutisms?
Who is doing that?Maybe because I can see past one spectrum? Or do not divide people on far-right and braindead lefts?
It has nothing to do with Merkel. If I remember she even voted against same sex marriage a few years ago.I never knew that Angela Merkel is so LGBT friendly.
Nobody, unfortunately. Unless you mean who isn't doing that. Then pretty much eveyrone on here. Anyway, don't we have football to dicuss now?Who is doing that?
I don't think you understand what whataboutism is. It's a fallacy on an argument which means it's flawed.Maybe because I can see past one spectrum? Or do not divide people on far-right and braindead lefts?
Of course it will have been flawed if it isn't argument solidifying your point. Seriously guys keep rambling the same one-sided arguments so it makes you feel better. Don't want to be rude but there's no point talkingI don't think you understand what whataboutism is. It's a fallacy on an argument which means it's flawed.
Who's 'they'?I wonder why do they want everyone to know about their sexual orientation. How about those who prefer bestiality?
I'm a practising Muslim and hold traditional beliefs about the LGBQT lifestyle being sinful. That is my personal belief.
I do not believe for a second that any LGBQT person should be discriminated against for thier sexuality/lifestyle.
The rainbow flag is a symbol for LGBQT rights. Why is UEFA prohibiting a club from putting that flag on a stadium. The rights of humans is not a political matter.
What does it say about UEFA that they made this decision? I hope Bayern do it anyway.
I'm a practising atheist and hold traditional beliefs about muslim lifestyle being stupid and disgusting. That is my personal belief.
I do not believe for a second that any muslim person should be discriminated against for their lifestyle.
Are you able to see a conflict between those two sentences?
It's probably not a place to discuss this, but surely you can see than any organised religion castigating one section of society as 'sinful' is pretty much the definition of discrimination?
It's probably not a place to discuss this, but surely you can see than any organised religion castigating one section of society as 'sinful' is pretty much the definition of discrimination?
Discrimination: " the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, sex, or disability."
Yea, that's exactly what I meant and I think it's extremely obvious to be honest. It's hard for me to comprehend the hypocrisy of "religious" people in this context. That's very sinful to me, as a practicing atheist.
The key word here is "treatment", not "belief".
Believing someone lives a "sinful life" is not the same as actively discriminating. You can hold whatever personal belief you want in privacy as long as your actions aren't discriminatory. I see no reason to attack a user that proclaims to have a certain faith while he also declares that despite his personal faith every person should have the same rights and chances. What he believes about the afterlife doesn't necessarily mean that his actions in and views about this life aren't perfectly acceptable.
Granted, there's a lot of religious people who do discriminate others. I don't think @Zlatattack is one of them.
It's probably not a place to discuss this, but surely you can see than any organised religion castigating one section of society as 'sinful' is pretty much the definition of discrimination?
Discrimination: " the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, sex, or disability."
I do sort of understand UEFAs position in not getting involved in anything with political undertones.
I do sort of understand UEFAs position in not getting involved in anything with political undertones. I'd even give them the benefit of the doubt if it weren't for their past actions.
I'm a practising atheist and hold traditional beliefs about muslim lifestyle being stupid and disgusting. That is my personal belief.
I do not believe for a second that any muslim person should be discriminated against for their lifestyle.
Are you able to see a conflict between those two sentences?
I agree with a lot of what you're saying, so please don't consider this a personal attack or even an attack on religion, but to consider someone's lifestyle as sinful, and say as much, is to discriminate. You don't have to call someone a name or use a slur, or go to the extremes of attending anti-gay rallies or committing a hate crime to discriminate.It'd be discriminatory if I treated people any differently. If i hold those views privately and don't treat anyone negatively because of those views, it's not discriminatory. If you think my faith is stupid, or the whole concept of faith is stupid, or whatever - as long as you don't treat me or other people of faith badly because of what you think, what does it matter? All over the world there are people who think their God or their approach to God is the right one, people who think there is no such thing. On the whole they get along because they keep their views to themselves and don't mistreat each other because of said views.
Most people on this forum don't like Liverpool, but most people on this forum would never really treat someone from Liverpool negatively simply because they are from that city, or support that club. Anyone who does is a dick.
My point was that UEFA are politicising something that isn't political, and I think they're discriminating in doing it. If something horrible happened in a country somewhere and organisers wanted to project a flag in solidarity with the victims, they wouldn't have a problem. This flag is in solidarity with those discriminated against because of their sexuality. In my opinion anyway.
I do sort of understand UEFAs position in not getting involved in anything with political undertones. I'd even give them the benefit of the doubt if it weren't for their past actions.
I do think rainbow flags etc in football are a bit of a waste of time, as long as no players dare to come out. People will only start to change their minds when one of their favourite players turns out to be gay.
Brilliantly put!It'd be discriminatory if I treated people any differently. If i hold those views privately and don't treat anyone negatively because of those views, it's not discriminatory. If you think my faith is stupid, or the whole concept of faith is stupid, or whatever - as long as you don't treat me or other people of faith badly because of what you think, what does it matter? All over the world there are people who think their God or their approach to God is the right one, people who think there is no such thing. On the whole they get along because they keep their views to themselves and don't mistreat each other because of said views.
Most people on this forum don't like Liverpool, but most people on this forum would never really treat someone from Liverpool negatively simply because they are from that city, or support that club. Anyone who does is a dick.
My point was that UEFA are politicising something that isn't political, and I think they're discriminating in doing it. If something horrible happened in a country somewhere and organisers wanted to project a flag in solidarity with the victims, they wouldn't have a problem. This flag is in solidarity with those discriminated against because of their sexuality. In my opinion anyway.
I agree with a lot of what you're saying, so please don't consider this a personal attack or even an attack on religion, but to consider someone's lifestyle as sinful, and say as much, is to discriminate. You don't have to call someone a name or use a slur, or go to the extremes of attending anti-gay rallies or committing a hate crime to discriminate.
Do you think less of people who eat meat?This is simply not true. I think eating meat is sinful. Does that mean I discriminate against people who aren't vegan? Doesn't make any sense.
As long as you treat others like you expect to be treated, you can believe whatever you like
If privately disagreeing with how someone lives their life is considered discrimination, then I feel the act of discrimination will never be abolished. I would agree with @Zlatattack in the opinion that two individuals can live their lives in different manners, be it religious, ethical or sexual but still be able to treat each other accordingly and respectfully.I agree with a lot of what you're saying, so please don't consider this a personal attack or even an attack on religion, but to consider someone's lifestyle as sinful, and say as much, is to discriminate. You don't have to call someone a name or use a slur, or go to the extremes of attending anti-gay rallies or committing a hate crime to discriminate.
As a member of the LGBTQ+ community it’s pretty disheartening to see UEFA’s response, along with some of the posts in here. Long way to go until we feel welcome.
Would you say he was respectful, if he didn’t have religion as a perfect excuse? If an atheist says/thinks gays live in sin he would be calles homophobic. When he questions anything about trans rights, he is called transphobic. If a religious person dies the same it’s perfectly fine because we have to respect beliefs. Honestly I’m not sure how liberals can support religious and gay paople at the same time while one group discriminates the other.Those two sentences don't conflict. He was perfectly respectful.
Ultimately, people have beliefs that I disagree with, including that being gay is sinful. I don't believe it is. But I can see how someone who is a Muslim or Christian might. If they treat gay people respectfully and afford them the same rights as anyone else, who are you to police their thoughts on the matter ?
I agree with that too. We just disagree on whether discrimination neccessatates acting on your beliefs or just believing your beliefs.If privately disagreeing with how someone lives their life is considered discrimination, then I feel the act of discrimination will never be abolished. I would agree with @Zlatattack in the opinion that two individuals can live their lives in different manners, be it religious, ethical or sexual but still be able to treat each other accordingly and respectfully.
This is simply not true. I think eating meat is sinful. Does that mean I discriminate against people who aren't vegan? Doesn't make any sense.
As long as you treat others like you expect to be treated, you can believe whatever you like