Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
The distinction between LvG and Mourinho in terms of negative and attacking is greatly misleading I feel. It's a media oversimplification, not to mention that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever as to what Mourinho will try to implement here, not yet at least. LvG, a bit like Pep does not view defence and attack as separate entities. He wants to defend from the front through winning the ball back as soon as possible and keeping it for as long as possible. He believes that the more you play far away from your goalkeeper, the less defending you have to do and more time you have to attack obviously. The problem is that once he achieved that to a largely good level as our defensive record suggests, and more importantly our stats regarding how little time was spent in our half by our opponents, he couldn't implement the other half of the plan; doing something with that possession.
Mourinho is more traditional, he wants to defend through actually defending. He builds his team to work on defending the zone as in sitting behind the ball and closing down the space between the lines. Attacking wise, he wants to leave that to the forwards and their creativity as long as it's not at the expense of defensive solidity. The result is that when playing against weak or mid table opponents, that defensive organisation is called upon less because his players are usually better meaning that the forwards enjoy more time in the final third and have room to show their talents. The downside is that when facing strong teams, his teams are pinned back defending deep and his forwards are isolated because the midfielders are suffocated and busy getting behind the ball. The point is that LvG's approach can produce mind numbingly rigid football when it isn't performed with the speed and sharpness needed in the final third but it can also produce the type of football we see from Bayern. Same for Mourinho, when he has Di Maria, Özil and Ronaldo, his approach can produce some thrilling football but when faced with sides that are good at pressing and possession, his teams can produce football that is more reminiscent of Stoke than Manchester United.
In that regard, Mourinho's approach probably does need a more "warrior" defender as you put it simply because his teams are more likely to invite pressure. But I feel that he made his choice in buying Bailly and he has to stand up by that decision because too many new faces can be problematic. It takes time for them to gel and be part of the unit, not to mention, it kills any soul the team might have. As I said earlier, it is a balancing act and I feel that our business so far is on the line. We obviously needed more creativity so there was no point trying to maintain some continuity when the present players were obviously not good enough but any more than that and it is an overkill.
I'm not disagreeing with much you have said here in truth, I think the biggest difference between LvG and Pep for instance is the way the forwards play on rails for LvG, or at least ours did a lot of the time, not free to move out of their invisible boxes, where as Pep encourages a greater freedom of movement and invention.
My main point was that the style LvG implemented does protect the actual CB's a lot more when attacked as the midfield under him had 2 sitters, Pep's teams only play with one and while Jose approaches things differently the biggest reason he needs the extra power at CB is he doesn't offer the double cover, or at least he hasn't in his previous two clubs with Modric and Fabregas having a lot of attacking freedom most weeks. My point being that if we play Smalling and Blind with Pogba having the freedom of the two aforementioned CM's, we'd be in trouble, a CB like Bonucci would even out that aspect IMO.
As for your point about backup being unreliable, that's the case everywhere I feel. It is why it's called backup. Real have Nacho as backup. Barcelona have bleeding Mathieu and Vermaelen and the Chelsea side that won the league two years did not even have backup. If there are injuries, you suffer but you can't build a team expecting that everyone will be injured just in case.
Maybe I'm overly expectant but when Rio and Vidic were our CB's I didn't feel Brown, O'Shea and Evans were anywhere near the plummet in quality Jones and Rojo are as cover. To me they could both go with Bonucci coming in to partner Smalling with Bailly and Blind as the cover/competition.
Hard to argue with that. There usually are extremes when it comes to these issues. Either play the 18 year olds or forget them about entirely and focus on winning at all costs seem to be the only two views. Obviously there needs to be a bit of balance which is clearly easier said than done. I liked LvG's approach in that regard with having senior experienced first teamers but not overloading the squad so as to open up opportunities for the youngsters. Obviously that backfires when you have too many injuries but the principles I feel were fair and could yield a nice balance.
I just think we are entering a very dangerous period where we are seeing 19 and 20 year olds written off because they aren't first teamers like Rooney and Ronaldo were at that age, they are the exceptions rather than the rule. Don't get me wrong, I love to see young players in and around the squad and if Jose has singled out Rashford and TFM as the 2 to focus on this season then that's great, the problem under LvG was we reached a point where we were throwing kids in for a game here and there and they were never seen again, like Riley, Love and Weir, it didn't feel mapped out like their development should be, it felt like throwing them in and just seeing which ones stuck.