Adebesi
Full Member
It feels like you are subtly moving the goal posts. I can see that the difference between 8 months and 18 months on a contract is significant, that isnt what we are talking about, we are talking about player ages. And the 28-30-32 age watersheds you have cited are IMO utterly arbitrary. There are big differences between the situations of Baines and Rooney that revolve around their marketability, their ability, their "loyalty". A ten month age difference is not a deciding factor IMO. Anyway, cheers for responding to my question, I was interested to hear your take on the differences between the two situations.Its the difference between a little and a lot of money. Does a player have 8 months on his contract or 18? Its also the length of a huge injury layoff or a huge increase or decrease in a player's profile. 10 months ago Mata was Chelsea's clear, best player. Now he's joining United as a Chelsea backup. 10 months or a season is a long, long time in football and of course it makes a difference if a player plays for your club for 3 years like Baines or 4 years like Rooney.
There are certain cut-off points where you'll find clubs generally don't pay a lot for a player or think about moving a player on or not offering them a new deal. One of those is about 28 the next is 30, the next is about 32. Leighton Baines is close to not being valuable even if he has a long contract. If Rooney had a long contract without any special agreements we might not know about, he'd still be very valuable player. And that 10 months makes up a large part of the difference.
If we swapped their ages around and Rooney was 10 months older than Baines, Rooney a player of 29 years of age could have a 5 year solid contract and he still wouldnt be worth a huge amount of money to the buying club just because he's nearing that next magic cutoff point where clubs get a bit nervous.