antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
You you
Could have been worse, can't complain too much
Still, could be a blessing in disguise, as Davids would have been a relative liability in another surprise that we are cooking up for you guys.
You you
Could have been worse, can't complain too much
Aye, it's frustrating a bit, but not to that extend for me. Still one of the best for formation tactics the other are even worse. Have you considered changing the browser?
And you didn't even vote for me!17. Romario 18. Bozsik
Bozsik was an emergency call-up though, else Baresi was a shoe-in for that box.And you didn't even vote for me!
2. J. Cruyff (injured)
Two men don't make a team, you know that better than anyone. In the same way that Joga and Annah's Brazilian superstar spunkfest didn't make a team (or not as much of a team as what they came up against).
Two men don't make a team, you know that better than anyone. In the same way that Joga and Annah's Brazilian superstar spunkfest didn't make a team (or not as much of a team as what they came up against).
Skizzo and Annah starting to look like my All-time draft team
Sore losers, including me)I actually think it's odd when managers point out how their leftovers get picked up by others as an indication they had a great team. What they always have is enough great players, which get picked by various managers that often find a better use for them.
Not enough central players----------------Pele-------------------
-------Maradona------Mazzola---------
-----------Didi---------Rivera--------
Netto------Beckenbauer------Neeskens
-----Schwarzenbeck--Bergomi---------
@antohan what happens if you don't have a like for like replacement on the bench? Makes no sense the better team, that is leading in the score, to lose, because you fielded a striker at right back due to the roll of the dice
Your problem given:
1) You picked a potential liability
2) You didn't get strength in depth across the squad
3) Your best solution to losing a right back is sticking a striker there
It's exactly how it can pan out in real life. We left it for the semis as squads should be large enough by now to cope with such eventualities.
I think is an excellent idea, but not for the particular draft, or one that is near to its end. As Edgar mentioned I think after the initial drafting finished - changes to the rules would be kept to a minimum, hence everybody picked players to cover their weaknesses, not squad depth.
In real life you have a 24-25 man squad that is compiled for the course of a season which you'd know that all players are most likely to take part in it, but you know it beforehand(still there are idiots that go in a season with only one senior striker in Rooney, but that's another matter) during the transfer period.
Even if you don't have senior players you have youth, academy, specialized in the exact position and you take them on the bench. Here you have sometimes exact number of defenders, full backs, even keepers. It rewards more those who stacked GOAT's that would be benched rather than team balance.
For example in my case it's better to pick Best and bench him due to one of Dinho/Eusebio possibly getting send off, rather than keeper for team balance.
On the other hand it's a great idea for next drafts as it brings a lot of realism and with bigger teams that can be achieved from the off - you also pick squad players or versatile players that can do a great job, albeit inferior quality.
I think you can even take it further with injuries mid game on random principle and you have to bring a sub on. Say near the 60th minute (15th hour or something) you randomize one player that has to be taken off(even GK).
In this way you also can put a preliminary 16 men squad along with your tactics (5 subs) for all players who can enter the game later on. Tell me if I took it too far.
Having said that I think this idea is really great for next drafts especially if it can be put to action properly so well done you both!
It is harsh on Enigma after that VDS pick. And to stick the knife in a bit further... even moreso when I don't really rate VDS any higher than Julio Cesar - wins on longevity and overall class, but peak performance the Brazilian might just edge him.
Still it is a monopoly draft and random chaos was always part of the deal between manager and draft overlord.
Savage.And to stick the knife in a bit further... even moreso when I don't really rate VDS any higher than Julio Cesar - wins on longevity and overall class, but peak performance the Brazilian might just edge him.
Ronnie is also probably the only player to have been sent off that many times with a smileNeither takes part in the event, I doubt they picked up 5 red cards during their careers (edit: looks like Dinho was a bad boy, 8 reds = 1 ticket in the draw). That is the point. You pick Paolo Montero, you get Paolo Montero, the good and the bad. You pick Bossis? No problem. It's a more fair reflection of the players picked.
It's boring if everyone has been warned. In fact, I wouldn't make it a permanent fixture necessarily, but a possibility that you choose to factor in or not when going full muppet piling up #10s.
And no, for all the squirming, no "next draft" in it.
Well it's probably a smart move from a voting perspective. VdS is a more credible member of the top tier of goalkeepers than Julio Cesar on the Caf at least. As for the man himself, I'd rank him as the best keeper in the world during 2008/09 and 2009/10. He won Serie A keeper of the year both seasons ahead of Buffon, while Casillas started to get error prone again in the autumn of 2008/09. And very influential in Inter's treble climaxing with that save from Messi in the Nou Camp.Nah I don't have problems with whatever anto and Edgar decide. You'd cope with what's in front of you, just sharing my thoughts
on a side note I think you are the only one who rates Julio Cesar around here, or at least my impression from last game.
Aren't these things meant to be judged on 3 year peaks though?Julio Cesar was a fine keeper but his peak is way too short (albeit being arguably the best goalie in the world behind a sturdy defensive unit) to be even compared with VdS imo - mind you, I do rate VdS higher than others.
Aren't these things meant to be judged on 3 year peaks though?
Yeah I know but if we're going to ask voters to judge based on 3 year peak then that's exactly what should be judged.Aye but career peak and the player's longevity are always judged in fine balance, subject to each individual's preference. For instance, Falcao was the best centre forward in the game for a good couple of seasons or thereabouts, however his career isn't all that when we look at the entirety of it. Or Sneijder for example.