Moby
Dick
Yeah why not! Make someone lose a player, miss a round and have a player stolen all in one swift move. Great game mechanics.but I dont see why they would be pernamently immune to PNut.
Yeah why not! Make someone lose a player, miss a round and have a player stolen all in one swift move. Great game mechanics.but I dont see why they would be pernamently immune to PNut.
I don't know why would anyone even think that way. People are weird.I can't reveal one of my wicked plans was to take Redondo despite not needing him in the slightest just to see your meltdown.
I took that as meaning immunity lasts all of Round 7 but thats it. If a player lands on Square 1 he isn't immune to landing on square 13 the next turn yes?
PNut's Bonus is active until Round 9 so the next two rounds Aldo and Joga are vulnerable. Maybe I am just misunderstanding the entire way these surprise rounds work? It seemed clear to me that people crappy picked are immune to PNut that turn but I dont see why they would be permanently immune to PNut.
It doesnt really make any sense for Aldo to be permanently immune to PNut because he got sent to Box 13 on Round 7. The no Double Negative seems to only apply to a single round.
Otherwise why isn't it stated that people can't land in Box 13 twice? That is a double negative also.
Yeah why not! Make someone lose a player, miss a round and have a player stolen all in one swift move. Great game mechanics.
Well I wasn't sent to 13 due to roll of dice. Either ways that's what the mod said, not me, so better if you clear it up with him.Put aside your lobbying for a minute and I think you see my point. It makes no logical sense that you would be immune permanently to PNut because you got sent to Box 13. By that interpreting everyone that has been at box 13 or box 1 should be immune to PNut bonus because of "no double negative".
I've no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps explain me first before accusing me of doing something?
Yes, losing a round and a player is a great benefit to have, you are completely right.Everyone is trying to re-interpret EAP's unclear rules for their benefit. Its pretty obvious haha. Of course you "think you are immune to crappy permanently" because that benefits you the most
Yes, losing a round and a player is a great benefit to have, you are completely right.
It's also funny that you can only talk about my team when this actually applies to two teams not one. Chill out, in my opinion.
You are talking about votes with someone who is in favour of scrapping the whole tournament part after getting bored with it coz of playing it for years.. so think again.For me, I am not going to make my votes on this draft based on NAMES. I am going to vote for the manager that made the most of what lady luck dealt.
You are talking about votes with someone who is in favour of scrapping the whole tournament part after getting bored with it coz of playing it for years.. so think again.
Everyone is trying to re-interpret EAP's unclear rules for their benefit. Its pretty obvious haha. Of course you "think you are immune to crappy permanently" because that benefits you the most
For me, I am not going to make my votes on this draft based on NAMES. I am going to vote for the manager that made the most of what lady luck dealt.
Just saying!
Surely you've got to vote for who you think will win the match and not just who has dealt with the rotten luck the best?
Hehe, like I said, the days of being serious in these things are long, long gone.Yeah I realize its different for most of you who have done this for years than me who just started. I can respect that. Just trying to have fun, don't take my banter serious and I won't take yours serious
Denmark, Greece and Portugal all won the Euroes when no expert would have declared them the best team on paper.
Surely the only way to emulate reality is to take that into account
p-nut definitely did nazi that coming
Ah, never mind. Your first reply was without further explanation so I thought you just let him be on purpose.I've no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps explain me first before accusing me of doing something?
we would have picked him as well.He played for Ireland and was born in England. Double fail. Would have picked him myself otherwise!
Leicester says hello!It's a 1 out of 1000 scenario though. Surely you vote for the 999 out of 1000 scenario seen as the question is most likely to win.
At this rate he will be the most eligible GOAT around. Maybe I should have picked him in the United box.we would have picked him as well.
true. I'm 38 and I've learnt about players who I hadn't heard before playing this game, players like Lakhdar Belloumi, Nicolae Dobrin and Jürgen Sparwasser. Youtube or Google them, very good players.I'm young in my defence and never heard of him before. One of the joys of these drafts hearing you all describe players previously unknown to me.
Will never forget the scenes for my whole life!Leicester says hello!
Nope. I thought I had missed some rule change or something, before realising I was being wummed.I thought you just let him be on purpose.
You live next door to the Stadium?Will never forget the scenes for my whole life!
To think I had the fortune of being next door while the whole thing unfolded!
yes!You live next door to the Stadium?
Nice. Do you watch us playing away in Leicester?yes!
Did last time out. The kick off was scheduled at 5 30, I reached home at 5 15, left at 5 20, met my friend who had the tickets outside the stadium and we were at the seats before the kick offNice. Do you watch us playing away in Leicester?
Did last time out. The kick off was scheduled at 5 30, I reached home at 5 15, left at 5 20, met my friend who had the tickets outside the stadium and we were at the seats before the kick off
The only time Schweinsteiger scored for us...
That was given an own goal by Deeney.Didn't he score for us against Watford as well? Last minute aswell I think.
That was given an own goal by Deeney.
Bastian has a single goal for United, scored at The King Power!