Skorenzy
Full Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
- Messages
- 5,945
On what basis Costa was 'head & shoulders' above Ronaldo in league? Ronaldo's stats show 31 goals, 9 assists in 31 games. Costa's show 27 goals and 3 assists in 34 games. A wide forward having that kind of stat than a striker can no way be 'head & shoulders' below. If it is midfielder, yeah we can't compare purely in terms of goals but if Costa, a striker, was that much better, it should reflect in stats, simple as. Don't tell me how he brought others in game etc, because that these big 2 do anyway on regular basis.
In the end, whether it is Atletico last season, or Germany in world cup or Bayern a year ago, it was a collective effort where many players shone and did very well. That doesn't mean those players were better than Ronaldo & Messi individually. Atletico aren't doing too bad without Costa even replacing him with someone of lesser skills in Mandzukic. RM and Barca however, will become considerably worse if Ronaldo & Messi were to leave. Imagine a Real side replacing Ronaldo with Bale (a very good player) and hoping for 18 games winning streak. Impossible.
On the basis that I watched the vast majority of games involving these players and in my opinion his performances were equally consistent, more influential and more impressive. On the basis that Diego Costa scoring 27 league goals for Atlético is a far, far harder and far more impressive feat than Cristiano scoring 31 for RM or Messi scoring 28 for Barça in roughly the same amount of games (the latter both teams that cracked the 100-goal barrier, in contrast to Atléti's 77 which is closer to fourth highest scorers Sevilla's 69).
Re: bold, because this somehow doesn't apply to Cristiano and Messi? It's always a collective effort where many players shine in teams that are fighting for the biggest honours. With Germany or Bayern I could at least understand the reasoning behind it (no stand-out player in terms of goals/assists), even if I don't agree with it. In this case, Diego Costa was clearly the stand-out player in terms of "productivity", scoring at least twice as many league goals as the next highest scorer in his team (Villa with 13), an even better proportion as Cristiano and Messi. Tell me, which Atlético player would be Bale's (15 goals, 12 assists in 27 league games) equivalent? Or Benzema's (17 goals, 9 assists in 35 games)? Alexis Sánchez's (19 goals, 10 assists in 34 games)? Even bloody Pedro (15 goals, 8 assists in 37 games). It's not the most sizeable sample ever, but it still says quite a lot: in the 3 league games Diego Costa missed Atléti only scored 4 goals (1.33 gpg), compared to Barça's 20 goals in 7 games without Messi (2.86 gpg) or RM's 25 in 8 games without Cristiano (3.13 gpg). But, yeah, Diego Costa's supporting cast made all the difference here, clearly.
Sorry but I don't agree with that at all, or at least not with the Messi and Ronaldo part. They are being judged on their own standards that they set, and compared to the other players and their own individual standards. Are you seriously going to tell me that judging them both from the same level, that Vela was better then Messi last season? He had a great season for his own standards, Messi had a poor one for his own standards, but that's not how you judge them. You judge them from the same standard when discussing personal honors and Messi's 'poor' season was still way better then how anyone else performed apart from Cristiano Ronaldo. It does effectively rule out anyone else winning it while those 2 are playing, as it should though. Nobody else comes close to those 2 productivity wise even when they have poor seasons. Best player rewards aren't made to make some people feel good and recognize the players who improved a lot and had great personal seasons. They're made to recognize the best player in that year (or best forward, best midfielder, best defender, etc. ). It's not fair to compare the players to their own previous standards and rule one out like Messi because his worse year still beats Vela's great year.
Also farce that Ronaldo won it? Please. He scored more goals then Costa, and had more assists playing as a wide forward, compared to Costa is a striker. He had a great season individually, but he has never been a patch on Ronaldo and never will be. Ridiculous to say otherwise.
I do judge them equally and I don't take Messi's or Cristiano's "previous standards" into account, I never said otherwise. At the end I factor in a lot of context though (quality of team mates, league, opponents; quality ánd quantity of goals, assists, chances created, build-up play; their position/role, influence/impact on team performances ánd results and on winning trophies, etc.). It should be obvious to everyone that the "productivity" Cristiano and Messi are displaying is significantly linked to the teams they are playing for and team mates they are playing with. But apparently it isn't obvious. "Nobody else comes close to those 2 productivity wise even when they have poor seasons." Explain this to me then.
Minutes per goals+assists, La Liga (2009-14). Just Barça/RM players + Falcao for context. Not including the current season.
- Messi, 55' (five seasons)
- Cristiano, 62' (five seasons)
- Higuaín, 74' (four seasons)
- Bale 77' (one season)
- Benzema, 91' (five seasons)
- Alexis Sánchez, 92' (three seasons)
- Neymar 103' (one season)
- Falcao, 104' (two seasons)
Minutes per goals+assists, CL (2009-14). Just Barça/RM players, not including the current season.
- Cristiano 70' (five seasons)
- Messi 73' (five seasons)
- Benzema 73' (five seasons)
- Bale 88' (one season)
- Neymar 111' (one season)
- Higuaín 147' (four seasons)
- Alexis Sánchez 226' (three seasons)
As if any other team in Spain could ever even come close to having more than 1 forward producing at such an absurd rate, ie. at least a goal or an assist around or better than every 90 minute, over multiple seasons. If Diego Costa then manages to come close to this level of output, I don't see how you can't think that is more impressive considering his supporting cast is nowhere near such numbers. If that player also performs at a similar level to Cristiano/Messi throughout the season, with more stand-out performances in general and in important matches as well, then that is how I arrive at my opinion that Diego Costa and Vela were among, if not outright, the two best forwards in La Liga last season. (and if even the inept LFP agrees -- yes, agrees, I already called it back in May -- that these two names belong in the top-3 at least, then you know I'm not just spouting bs for the sake of it.)