Asking 80m for their bench warmer would also constitute as destroying the market. That would actually dramatically reduce their net spend.
Then EPL is the one destroying it, because no one forced Chelsea to buy him. The could have simply bought some striker from 11th. team in EPL.....and paid even more!
Real Madrid are the reason transfers are so hiked now it all started with Figo for £51 in 2000, then Zidane £62 million in 2001, then again in 2009 with £80 million for Ronaldo and then again in 2013 with £86 million for Bale.
You guys ruined football you're the sole reason the likes of United, City and PSG have to pay ridiculous fees now.
Only that's not how the market works. Look at the names you're using in your argument. Figo, Zidane, Ronaldo, Bale. At the same time Real Madrid never spent the kind of money EPL clubs are spending on dross. That is your and only your contribution to the market.
The funny thing is there was no reason for the market to follow Madrid footsteps. There was nothing to follow and no reason at all for prices to go up like they did. You are talking about few superstars signed by Madrid in the span of last
14 years and in that period other clubs from other leagues never signed players of that caliber and they also never overpaid for mediocrity. Neymar and Suarez signings prove my point.
Aside from Higuain (which was a statement signing more then anything else) and Di Maria no serious club in Europe (EPL excluded) signed a player for more then 50 mil € ever.
You should now understand that you just don't get it. Nothing changed in the world. EPL got more money so all the players in EPL are now worth that much more and traded for that much more (in your little bubble market). The rest of Europe is using the situation and charging EPL clubs what they can because you are showing them the way, but between themselves Spain, Germany, Italy, France and Portugal keep prices on a reasonable level and you'll never see a player like Walker or Mendy going for that kind of money if it's not to EPL.
Our net spend is almost 600m in the negative to you guys and yet we earn way more revenue than you guys?
United do earn way more only if you don't know how to read. Real Madrid has been leading the revenue list of world football for last 11 years in a row. Your new Adidas and Chevy deals are the reason why you took over last year but that won't last long because soon Madrid's contracts are up for renewal.
Posting some random numbers from a propaganda Twitter account is always nice. Please tell me you actually believe they are correct.
They are probably not correct, but if you'd go to transfermarkt right now to check the numbers, there's no doubt the list would be identical, only difference in $$ would be somewhat different.