Yes that’s exactly what I said.So you’d be fine to pay £300-£400 per match day to help fund those players currently living in poverty?
Yes that’s exactly what I said.So you’d be fine to pay £300-£400 per match day to help fund those players currently living in poverty?
how does match day revenue increase to pay even further inflated wages?Yes that’s exactly what I said.
What did you say? Footballers should be paid more?Yes that’s exactly what I said.
Merely pointed out that there’s significant disparity between some sports which I find interesting, as it probably indicates football as a whole is not doing a good job at maximizing its revenue potential.What did you say? Footballers should be paid more?
Money in football is so shit hese days compared to American sports. People here getting outraged that Mainoo may have requested £200k a week, which is just below $13m per year, meanwhile there's no decent NBA players you could get for even double that.
I know it's a roster of 15-17 v a squad of 23-25 players, on the other hand way more people are going to watch football than NBA globally, matchday revenue should be much higher with stadiums 4-5x larger than NBA arenas etc.
I guess it was supposed to be a hot take or a bait because comparing football with transfer fees and a completely different player ownership structure to NBA is just pointless. And I'd rather not see football games change into what is primarily a circus with a bit of a sport like NBAMoney in football is so shit hese days compared to American sports. People here getting outraged that Mainoo may have requested £200k a week, which is just below $13m per year, meanwhile there's no decent NBA players you could get for even double that.
I know it's a roster of 15-17 v a squad of 23-25 players, on the other hand way more people are going to watch football than NBA globally, matchday revenue should be much higher with stadiums 4-5x larger than NBA arenas etc.
So… £300-£400 per match day.Merely pointed out that there’s significant disparity between some sports which I find interesting, as it probably indicates football as a whole is not doing a good job at maximizing its revenue potential.
Ticket prices being 4-5 times larger and the fact that there is over 80 games a season?No transfer fees to pay. No stadium costs to pay.Money in football is so shit hese days compared to American sports. People here getting outraged that Mainoo may have requested £200k a week, which is just below $13m per year, meanwhile there's no decent NBA players you could get for even double that.
I know it's a roster of 15-17 v a squad of 23-25 players, on the other hand way more people are going to watch football than NBA globally, matchday revenue should be much higher with stadiums 4-5x larger than NBA arenas etc.
I wanted to watch a game 3 weeks ago and the price was around 300 USDSo… £300-£400 per match day.
Good points, they are able to fill out rosters with minimum players and draftees which football clubs can’t really do and you don’t get many players willing to play for you at £20k a week…Ticket prices being 4-5 times larger and the fact that there is over 80 games a season?No transfer fees to pay. No stadium costs to pay.
Roster size makes a huge difference. Look at some of the wages of your average NFL player in less important positions. This is despite revenue being higher than NBA teams with so many less games.
It looks to me like United’s total wage spend is higher than NBA teams. They are however able to highly pay two or three players and then fill the squad with players earning much less. Wages are much more evenly spread in football I would say.
Quick look shows United's first team has twice as many players under contract than the Celtics, while paying $40M more for this season. Nba teams don't have academies and quite simply have fewer operating expenses, including transfer fees. In the Nba you sign a player to a 40m/year deal and he costs you 40M/y. In football you sign a player for 100m on a five year deal, with a 20M/year contract, and he costs you 40M/yMoney in football is so shit hese days compared to American sports. People here getting outraged that Mainoo may have requested £200k a week, which is just below $13m per year, meanwhile there's no decent NBA players you could get for even double that.
I know it's a roster of 15-17 v a squad of 23-25 players, on the other hand way more people are going to watch football than NBA globally, matchday revenue should be much higher with stadiums 4-5x larger than NBA arenas etc.
The cost of living is generally higher in the USA though isn't it, and the average wage quite a bit higher than the UK?Money in football is so shit hese days compared to American sports. People here getting outraged that Mainoo may have requested £200k a week, which is just below $13m per year, meanwhile there's no decent NBA players you could get for even double that.
I know it's a roster of 15-17 v a squad of 23-25 players, on the other hand way more people are going to watch football than NBA globally, matchday revenue should be much higher with stadiums 4-5x larger than NBA arenas etc.
sounds worrying to me.. hope Ineos don't rip apart the future spine of the team
sounds worrying to me.. hope Ineos don't rip apart the future spine of the team
A long time too for agents to agitate. We can kick the can down the road but it might be a good idea to get something nailed down. Assuming the club intends to keep the player.We can worry about Mainoo in 12 months time - if he still hasn't signed a contract I will be worried....but the fact is, he still has 2.5 years on his contract. That is a long time to solve that problem
A long time too for agents to agitate. We can kick the can down the road but it might be a good idea to get something nailed down. Assuming the club intends to keep the player.
Ineos only care about money, balancing books...and all that jazz. I mean some of their cost cutting measures are absolutely ridiculous. We're a football club, it's a community...we're not a blue chip petrol chemical company where this ruthless marginal gains work. Anyway, academy players are highly profitably...so anything's possible. Even a talented local lad (Kobbie)living his dream by playing for his childhood team isn't off limits.
You are a few decades late for that I’m afraid.I'd rather not see football games change into what is primarily a circus with a bit of a sport like NBA
Bit of an asinine questionIf someone offered 50 mill would you sell him?
YesIf someone offered 50 mill would you sell him?
If someone offered 50 mill would you sell him?
No, but add 20m on top of that and I wouldIf someone offered 50 mill would you sell him?
Really like him and obviously want him to stay but he should be told to piss off if he’s asking for £200k a week, we need to bring an end to this madness and if losing him is the start of ending it so be it,
Seen a clip the other day of Vidic talking about how he chose United over Liverpool even though he ended up on less at United than he was on at Spartak cause there was a proper structure in place and you had to work your way up it, we need to get this mindset back into place to avoid more cases of Rashford, Martial, Maguire etc where we’re stuck with these players cause their wages far exceed their talent,
£200k and he hasn’t played 60 games yet, he should be offered £80/100k with some performance incentives and told if you don’t like it off you go
Contract including option until summer 28, so not a particularly peculiar situationWhat's the situation with his contract? I recall I read somewhere that he asked for a huge pay rise (which can be fakes news to be honest). But in reality he doesn't deserve after half a year of good football to be more than 80k. If he really wants something along 150k, then we should sell.