Oranges038
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2020
- Messages
- 15,002
Now that the funeral procession is finally over.
We should probably all send them a mass card.
We should probably all send them a mass card.
the powers that be really wanted Fergie to win league titles, which is why they gave Rio an 8 month ban for missing a drugs test. Seems like a reasonable punishment when Mutu got a lighter ban for testing positive for drugs.Just like the Ferguson ref asterisks if we're REALLY being holistic.
Well, the world wouldn't agree with you there. Anyways, it doesn't bother me as much as I find it fascinating how much a reaction it gets anytime someone dare to mention Klopp and Fergie in the same sentence.I wouldn't, he might sneak into my top 10, so no he isn't up there with any of the managers that have won multiple titles.
What bothers you so much about me laughing at the ridiculous notion that Klopp is right up there with Fergie?
You have to admit it’s a daft comparison though. There’s just no similarity between the two. One is the greatest manager ever, arguably, and the other won the league once. It’s a ludicrous leap of logic to compare them in any way.Well, the world wouldn't agree with you there. Anyways, it doesn't bother me as much as I find it fascinating how much a reaction it gets anytime someone dare to mention Klopp and Fergie in the same sentence.
I would have him at fifth, which probably would be the most reasonable ranking at this point. Then he'd be up there with Fergie, Pep, Wenger and Mourinho (as in behind them, on the fifth spot). Which is literally exactly what that poster said, he even entertained that there might be a few other managers above. What bothers you so much about that? Why do you stop reading at "up there with Fergie"?
Nobody compared them. They simply suggested that if one were to make a list of the 10 greatest PL managers Klopp would be in there together with Fergie and the others. I don't see what so upsetting about that.You have to admit it’s a daft comparison though. There’s just no similarity between the two. One is the greatest manager ever, arguably, and the other won the league once. It’s a ludicrous leap of logic to compare them in any way.
Who’s upset? I think the sentence was ‘up there with Fergie’ which just sounds completely nonsensical, to me. I guess it’s semantics.Nobody compared them. They simply suggested that if one were to make a list of the 10 greatest PL managers Klopp would be in there together with Fergie and the others. I don't see what so upsetting about that.
Because Pep is better than Klopp.How you can put Pep above him is beyond me, he took over a mid table side with a bang average squad and got them to the Champions League final on his 1st attempt and won it on his 2nd attempt, meanwhile Pep took charge of a team that were technically the joint 3rd best in Europe having just reached the Champions League Semi's and despite being given an unlimited transfer budget took 5 years to reach a Champions League final.
No they didn’tNobody compared them. They simply suggested that if one were to make a list of the 10 greatest PL managers Klopp would be in there together with Fergie and the others. I don't see what so upsetting about that.
The sentence wasn't that. It's where he chose to stop reading.Who’s upset? I think the sentence was ‘up there with Fergie’ which just sounds completely nonsensical, to me. I guess it’s semantics.
I think you should re-read the post then, because that's exactly what is said.No they didn’t
Because Pep is better than Klopp.
Well, you can believe that all you want. Won't change the fact the Pep will be remembered as better.He isnt though, Klopp worked his way to the top through Mainz and Dortmund while Pep has only had 3 jobs where he had top squads and huge budgets.
‘If you had to name ten managers, klopp would be high up there, up with fergie’I think you should re-read the post then, because that's exactly what is said.
Agree with this. I think there’s a lot to be said for the managers that are prepared to go to the biggest jobs, where winning is the only acceptable outcome. Klopp doesn’t seem to have that in him.Because Pep is better than Klopp.
And? What is the end of that sentence?‘If you had to name ten managers, klopp would be high up there, up with fergie’
Ok mate
Wenger pep and mourhino.And? What is the end of that sentence?
Well, you can believe that all you want. Won't change the fact the Pep will be remembered as better.
...and maybe another one or two that doesn't spring to mind. So, again, in a top 10 PL managers there would be all these managers. What's the big deal?Wenger pep and mourhino.
I'm afraid you're going to be dissapointed when he will be.But he wont because he isnt
How is this a fact, unless you only mean yourselfWell, you can believe that all you want. Won't change the fact the Pep will be remembered as better.
I'm afraid you're going to be dissapointed when he will be.
Well obviously it's not decided yet. Klopp could win 10 more league titles and a couple of CL's. But I deem that quite unlikely so I'm still gonna go with what I said only that I will rephrase fact to almost certainty.How is this a fact, unless you only mean yourself
Which is pure speculation and completely irrelevant.If Liverpool had of gotten Pep instead of Klopp he would never have achieved what Klopp has.
Which is pure speculation and completely irrelevant.
Of course it’s isn’t a fact. It’s impossible for a hypothetical to be a fact.Its not its a fact, the fact needed 1bn of players to reach a Champions League final after inheriting a team that had just reached the semi's and having an unlimited transfer budget while Klopp reached the final on his first attempt proves it.
But his lineup has gotten worse, Liverpool are really nothing special at the moment, only a few good players.Changing it evidently didn’t help, when they’ve not even finished runner up the last 3 seasons.
Look, he’s a great manager, but saying that the only obstacle to his team dominating the league (I.e winning more than 1 title in 9 years) is City when his team finished outside of top 2 70% of the time is fecking mental. You can give him a bit of leeway and scratch off the first 3 team building seasons, that’s still half the time.
The fact of the matter is he built 1 great team and has failed to sustain or refresh it, just like his Dortmund. As much as you want to discredit Pep’s achievements, they are simply aren’t in the same stratosphere when it comes to league consistency
Okay mate, it's a fact. Got me there.Its not its a fact, the fact needed 1bn of players to reach a Champions League final after inheriting a team that had just reached the semi's and having an unlimited transfer budget while Klopp reached the final on his first attempt proves it.
If you're counting the Super Cup then you may as well count the Community Shield as well. I'm counting neither. It's 5 trophies in my book.7 trophies, is that it?
Well, the world wouldn't agree with you there. Anyways, it doesn't bother me as much as I find it fascinating how much a reaction it gets anytime someone dare to mention Klopp and Fergie in the same sentence.
I disagree. Fergie would have won it. He would have found a way, he always did. He reinvented himself and the team several times.I disagree. During his time only City prevented Liverpool from probably winning 3 titles. At the end of the day, it's disingenuous to not factor in City and Guardiola as a massive factor in any manger not winning the league over the past 7 seasons. They aren't normal. They're bankrolled by a country and led by arguably the best manager in world football. You just HAVE TO be perfect to win the league with them in it and Klopp did well over the past few years. There's no way managers like Wenger or Fergie would have won the league with this current City team over 38 games.
And what?Probably based on Fergie only managing 90+ points 3 times. Peps done it 4 times in not even half the time he’s been in the prem.
And he hanothing to do with that?But his lineup has gotten worse, Liverpool are really nothing special at the moment, only a few good players.