jadajos
Last Man Standing finalist 2022/23
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2019
- Messages
- 407
- Supports
- Football
Well we've got now until June to change his mind about leaving. We have to go in hard.
Should be enough for all the five stages of grief tbf.
Well we've got now until June to change his mind about leaving. We have to go in hard.
Should be enough for all the five stages of grief tbf.
Which other PL managers have been at a club for 9 years and won basically every trophy there is to win, in the last 30 years or so?Don't get me wrong, it is huge news, and he is a great manager (if a bit of prick) but he's only been in the job for 8 years and his trophy haul is very good but hardly incredible.
Which other PL managers have been at a club for 9 years and won basically every trophy there is to win, in the last 30 years or so?
Pretty sure any league winner over the last while would have won the odd FA or Carabao cup if they were allowed the leeway Klopp received for half of his sub par league finishesWhich other PL managers have been at a club for 9 years and won basically every trophy there is to win, in the last 30 years or so?
Which other PL managers have been at a club for 9 years and won basically every trophy there is to win, in the last 30 years or so?
I fail to see why the result of the game matters - as if they put the montage together between the end of the game and the start of MOTD? They were airing it regardless and if I'm not mistaken, MOTD2 has those kind of clips (didn't watch the Klopp one) before every big game on Sunday with flashbacks to previous years. This was a clash between (now) the top 2 teams in the league a week after our manager announced his departure, chances were that it was going to be mentioned.So do you agree we need this constant outpouring every week? Where does it end?
It's not LFCTV, most of the country don't give a shit. If I was an Arsenal fan I'd be sat there gobsmacked knowing my team won yet the game is teed up by some Twitter level worship montage of the losing manager.
You're selling him short if you just describe his tenure as "won the league once". How he took over basically a perennial midtable team and transformed them into what we were (and currently still are to a degree), while being the person that he was/is - how he dominated the headlines and storylines in English football the last decade - has been quite something.I think that's the point. To have been there 9 years and won the league once, its not a SAF, Wenger or Mourinho rivalling stat (discounting Pep's cheating).
i do think hes the best current manager though and some degree of fawning is to be expected.
You're selling him short if you just describe his tenure as "won the league once". How he took over basically a perennial midtable team and transformed them into what we were (and currently still are to a degree), while being the person that he was/is - how he dominated the headlines and storylines in English football the last decade - has been quite something.
And "being the person that he was" doesn't mean he is faultless by the way, just to make that clear - he does moan about refereeing too much, he is hypocritical in interview especially after defeats, he is a sore loser, all that is true.
But that's the thing, he would've won more if Pep didn't cheat. We can look at statistics on paper but they belie the truth. Reaching high 90s in points should win you the league.I think that's the point. To have been there 9 years and won the league once, its not a SAF, Wenger or Mourinho rivalling stat (discounting Pep's cheating).
i do think hes the best current manager though and some degree of fawning is to be expected.
Then we would have won 2/3 (?) titles and it’s hard to pretend we’ve done well over the past decadeBut that's the thing, he would've won more if Pep didn't cheat. We can look at statistics on paper but they belie the truth. Reaching high 90s in points should win you the league.
We can't claim City have cheated and then claim Klopp hasn't done that well.
You beat what's in front of you, so yeah we'd have had much better seasons but you can see in Klopp's points totals he's done very well. United haven't reached those highs.Then we would have won 2/3 (?) titles and it’s hard to pretend we’ve done well over the past decade
But we would have beaten Klopps Liverpool to two/three titles ourselves?You beat what's in front of you, so yeah we'd have had much better seasons but you can see in Klopp's points totals he's done very well. United haven't reached those highs.
He'd be on Mourinho's level at least then, the Premier League is a lot different without City's cheating and yes, Ole no patterns of play just fecking shoot, would probably have won the Premier League.But we would have beaten Klopps Liverpool to two/three titles ourselves?
Thats the problem I have with Klopps praise and it’s subtly present in your post. You’ve just dismissed his sub par seasons and relegated our hypothetical titles below Liverpools. If Klopp doesn’t do well then nothing seems to count and it’s retconned to nothing substantial for everybody else. Problem is those sub par season accounts for a good 50 percent, if not more, of his reign
But that's the thing, he would've won more if Pep didn't cheat. We can look at statistics on paper but they belie the truth. Reaching high 90s in points should win you the league.
We can't claim City have cheated and then claim Klopp hasn't done that well.
The problem with your reasoning is that you seem to dismiss any "sub-par" (quod non) league season as a failure on his part.But we would have beaten Klopps Liverpool to two/three titles ourselves?
Thats the problem I have with Klopps praise and it’s subtly present in your post. You’ve just dismissed his sub par seasons and relegated our hypothetical titles below Liverpools. If Klopp doesn’t do well then nothing seems to count and it’s retconned to nothing substantial for everybody else. Problem is those sub par season accounts for a good 50 percent, if not more, of his reign
I agree on this one. He didn't follow up on our title winning season and our quadruple attempt season with (near) equally as strong league seasons, and that's fair to say. I don't blame him for that, but if you're evaluating his time at Liverpool then that's a fair criticism (like you mention, in my view the only one).One of the biggest (and perhaps only) blots on his record for me is the lack of consistency.
Inheriting a bang average team that ran riot in the league 12 months prior?The problem with your reasoning is that you seem to dismiss any "sub-par" (quod non) league season as a failure on his part.
16/17: top 4 finish in his first full season, still building towards his own squad after inheriting a bang average team
17/18: top 4 finish again and a CL final
18/19: runners-up with 97 points, won the CL
19/20: won the league
20/21: disappointing in the cups, still a top 4 finish. A rough stretch in Feb/Mar ruined our title hopes but still finished the league 10 games unbeaten while only losing once in our first 16 league games
21/22: runners-up with 92 points, won both domestic cups and got to the CL final
22/23: disappointing season after an exhausting 21/22 season
23/24: TBD but still in for 4 trophies in February
So where do you see those "sub-par" seasons you mention? This is a very logical curve, improving each year in the beginning with the culmination of our success in the period 2018-2022. The only seasons which we weren't up to standard were the years after we won the league, and the year after we were within striking distance of the quadruple midway through May. The point to take away from that is that he perhaps pushes his teams too far both mentally and physically which is not sustainable for years on end, but it's not like 21/22 was just your regular season either with the amount of games we had to play.
I honestly cannot remember a season apart from last season, during or after which I felt disappointed in him or the team. Even last year you just had this feeling of inevitability that we weren't going to be able to keep up our ridiculous level of play from the year before, and it was true.
Only just seen @Alex99's post.
I agree on this one. He didn't follow up on our title winning season and our quadruple attempt season with (near) equally as strong league seasons, and that's fair to say. I don't blame him for that, but if you're evaluating his time at Liverpool then that's a fair criticism (like you mention, in my view the only one).
oh dear
oh dear
I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to give him the most romantic of send off because Liverpool are the most sentimental fans in the country.It's a tricky situation, of course: you know you're on your last legs (figuratively), and that this will be your last season.
But I suspect it was a big mistake of him to declare he's leaving. The idea (as expressed by himself, publicly no less) that his players will give their all in a final hurrah is questionable at best.
oh dear
I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to give him the most romantic of send off because Liverpool are the most sentimental fans in the country.
So many similarities with the death of Queen Elizabeth II this. Perhaps everyone will line up around Liverpool to pay their respects and Jamie Carragher will get in trouble for jumping the queue.
I wouldn't be surprised if they wanted to give him the most romantic of send off because Liverpool are the most sentimental fans in the country.
That was in 2013-2014 with (and in large part due to) the best striker in the world at that time, who was gone before Klopp arrived. He didn't take over until October 2015.Inheriting a bang average team that ran riot in the league 12 months prior?
Let’s say Klopp leaves after every ordinary season he’s had as Liverpool manager, pick any one. Would the next manager coming in be known as a manager taking over a sub par team?