- Joined
- Nov 14, 2018
- Messages
- 8
He didn't looked owned. He just had a quiet game. Which is normal for a player of his experience in a team of underdogs vs the then title challengers.
Hes clearly owned, unless you are his agent.
He didn't looked owned. He just had a quiet game. Which is normal for a player of his experience in a team of underdogs vs the then title challengers.
Hes clearly owned, unless you are his agent.
Nah that Napoli-Atlanta game was one of Kim's top 5 games in terms of his performance in my opinion. And Hojlund was deleted.So you don't rate Hojlund then
Im his agent.Hes clearly owned, unless you are his agent.
Nah that Napoli-Atlanta game was one of Kim's top 5 games in terms of his performance in my opinion. And Hojlund was deleted.
This sounds like a transfer that will end up at PSG and then there will be a meltdown in this thread after the Italian media built everyones hopes up.Is it happening or not?
I think this may be one of those transfers that will drag on until the final day.
Has it not been said a million times already that his release clause can only be triggered first 2 weeks of July? Nothing will happen before thenIs it happening or not?
I think this may be one of those transfers that will drag on until the final day.
Is it happening or not?
I think this may be one of those transfers that will drag on until the final day.
Come back between July 1st and July 14thIs it happening or not?
I think this may be one of those transfers that will drag on until the final day.
Napoli media reporting that it's essentially a done deal. Hopefully that's true and we can save a little drama here.
Well that’s not true. Many deals are done with the agreement they will go through on a certain date. Even those with release clauses activating on certain dates. i.e. Haaland to City done in advance.Has it not been said a million times already that his release clause can only be triggered first 2 weeks of July? Nothing will happen before then
They seem legit but is this from their gossip columnQuestion is, how reliable is Il Mattino?
Well that’s not true. Many deals are done with the agreement they will go through on a certain date. Even those with release clauses activating on certain dates. i.e. Haaland to City done in advance.
Question is, how reliable is Il Mattino?
Another classic Cassidy post just making stuff up. You come out with nonsense and then spend 10 posts arguing about it. You honestly think Dortmund are stupid enough to sell the best young striker in the world for around £51m?They didn't pay his release clause that's why, the agreed a deal with Dortmund
Another classic Cassidy post just making stuff up. You come out with nonsense and then spend 10 posts arguing about it. You honestly think Dortmund are stupid enough to sell the best young striker in the world for around £51m?
City paid his release clause. The whole world knows that except you.
https://www.skysports.com/amp/footb...ning-of-borussia-dortmund-striker-in-51m-deal
Another classic Cassidy post just making stuff up. You come out with nonsense and then spend 10 posts arguing about it. You honestly think Dortmund are stupid enough to sell the best young striker in the world for around £51m?
City paid his release clause. The whole world knows that except you.
https://www.skysports.com/amp/footb...ning-of-borussia-dortmund-striker-in-51m-deal
not so sure about that as our leverage to max out a price might be goneBe a great statement of intent and direction if we sign Kim before Maguire is sold or even close to being sold.
I think Kims release clause only kicks in first 15 days of July.Be a great statement of intent and direction if we sign Kim before Maguire is sold or even close to being sold.
Pack it up Harry.
So going back to your original point, deals can be done before the activation date. I’ve literally just given you Haaland as an example. The deal was agreed months in advance even though the activation date was 1st July. Even the article I’ve shared is early June (before the activation date). Clubs don’t wait to sit around the table until the clause is active.Not making stuff up, I just remembered incorrectly. They activated his release clause, Kim Min Jeas release clause cannot be active until July (this has been reported everywhere)
In other cases where players have a clause (mainly when buying from Spanish clubs) the clubs agree a fee instead which matches the clause due to tax implications (I thought that's what City did here)
In any case, Kim Min-Jea's clause cannot be active until July.
So going back to your original point, deals can be done before the activation date. I’ve literally just given you Haaland as an example. The deal was agreed months in advance even though the activation date was 1st July. Even the article I’ve shared is early June (before the activation date). Clubs don’t wait to sit around the table until the clause is active.
Everyone knows he can’t be signed with the activation clause price until 1st July. But a deal can certainly be struck with the player before then.
Napoli media reporting that it's essentially a done deal. Hopefully that's true and we can save a little drama here.
ETH going 3 at the back?Be a great statement of intent and direction if we sign Kim before Maguire is sold or even close to being sold.
Will he though?
Good grief. No one is saying he can come right now. No one suggested that. Your beating about the bush now. A deal can be agreed with KMJ right now and the deal can go through on 1st July. Napoli would have no say in the matter at that point.Only if the contract allows it, and really no you can activating a clause doesn't mean the player joins right away (window has to open, etc)
As has been reported a millions times, in the case of Kim Min-Jae, the contract only allows for the clause to be activated July 1st - July 15th
Good grief. No one is saying he can come right now. No one suggested that. Your beating about the bush now. A deal can be agreed with KMJ right now and the deal can go through on 1st July. Napoli would have no say in the matter at that point.
The irony being, you are in fact missing the point. Haaland’s did have a date restriction. It couldn’t be activated till 1st July 2022! KMJ is the exact same except it has a 2 week window before the clause expires.You are missing the point.
Halaand contacts didn't have date restrictions on when the clause could be activated that summer. Kim Min-Jaes does, its pretty simple
You were arguing that we could get the deal done, and I'm saying no because the clause cannot be activated until July (which is well reported)
Without activating the clause the deal can't be agreed unless you agree a fee with Napoli before hand
The irony being, you are in fact missing the point. Haaland’s did have a date restriction. It couldn’t be activated till 1st July 2022! KMJ is the exact same except it has a 2 week window before the clause expires.
Man City agreed a deal before the activation date. Exact same could happen here.
This is like talking to an argumentative brick wall. Have a good day.
How are you struggling with this so much? I’ve not once mentioned City “activating” the release clause before 1st July. Neither has anyone mentioned KMJ’s clause being activated before then. You seem to be struggling with the difference between “agreeing a deal” and “activating a clause”.https://www.skysports.com/amp/footb...ning-of-borussia-dortmund-striker-in-51m-deal
Manchester City activated the Norway striker's release clause and the player will join on July 1 for a total of £85.5m including agents fees and other add-ons; Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp has said the Haaland deal will "set new levels" in the transfer market
City have paid the 21-year-old's release clause and expect to pay £85.5m in total when agent fees, signing bonus and other costs are taken into account.
I'm the one making stuff up though. Quite obviously if City activated the release clause in June then it could be activated before 1st July 2022. There is no way for United to ACTIVATE the Kim Min-Jae clause at the moment