Keir Starmer Labour Leader

Only in a 'time-travel' context and if H G Wells is involved.

Staying relevant hasn't done us much good, in my lifetime, cost us sh** loads of money and lives in wars we should never have been involved in. Harold Wilson was the last PM to refuse to get involved in conflicts that were nothing to do with us,

"The more things change the more they stay the same"!!! (someone once said)

The wars we've been in recently have nothing to do with the EU and everything to do with the US. Moving away from the EU will inevitably lead to us moving closer to the Americans. No doubt that will involve us getting dragged into whatever shenanigans they engage in. We've been happy enough to do that voluntarily the past few decades but retaining the ability to stay out of it would be nice.
 
You want a written constitution? Like other democracies? Which ensures power is constrained and gives citizens enforceable rights? But that's not how we do things...

We do have written constitution(s) that provides all that, we just don't have a single codified constitution.

We wouldn't need a codified constitution for PR it'd just need new/amended constitutions to be written.

The idea of a single codified constitution sounds appealing but it depends who forms it doesn't it. It could easily be detrimental and hinder progress (see the US).
 
The wars we've been in recently have nothing to do with the EU and everything to do with the US. Moving away from the EU will inevitably lead to us moving closer to the Americans. No doubt that will involve us getting dragged into whatever shenanigans they engage in. We've been happy enough to do that voluntarily the past few decades but retaining the ability to stay out of it would be nice.

Harold Wilson, was last British PM to turn down the US invitation 'to get involved' ....with Vietnam. Perhaps Wilson was trying to convince General de Gaulle to reverse his 'non' to our entry to the EEC, to prove we were not going to be the US insider in the EEC?

Actually, I was referring to your comment about keeping Britain relevant... the question being, who benefits from Britain being relevant? Being in or out of the EU makes no difference, both the EU and us go where we are pushed by the US, because the US bares the brunt of NATO costs (well it will until Trump gets back!).

You want a written constitution? Like other democracies? Which ensures power is constrained and gives citizens enforceable rights? But that's not how we do things...

Indeed, and anyone hoping we might change is living in a dream world, 'precedence' is what governs us in reality and who set the precedents?
 


Average labour member -

0_Id-like-to-call-out-Labour-as-liars-I-am-one-of-the-people-he-will-tax-moreThis-audience-membe.jpg
 
Was interesting listening to Alastair Campbell the other day about the electorate going back to the Tories in the months before an election and polls tightening.

Let's see if the new new Labour strategy works out
Will definitely happen. The right wing press will be in full election mode in line with Tory campaigns while they attack Labour.
 


He wasn't in the running to become PM then.

What you say and do in opposition can be a lot different to when you are the PM.

Sadly, but its a fact of life that millions of people seem to forget, reality changes everything.
 
He’s nowhere near the top 5%!
Pretty sure the next day there was a daily mail article talking about this guy love of expensive motor bikes.

For whatever reason rich people in the UK both want to keep all their wealth and also say they are working class. It’s very unusual.
 
He wasn't in the running to become PM then.

What you say and do in opposition can be a lot different to when you are the PM.

Sadly, but its a fact of life that millions of people seem to forget, reality changes everything.
You're right. Let's just accept that politicians never need to have any integrity or stand by their beliefs or promises. They should just be able to flip flop around constantly on any issue, and then gaslight people into thinking they're not doing that
 
Am I the only person who would rather have properly funded, NHS, Education System, Police Force, and Welfare System than lower taxes?

Normally I'd agree, but spending has been so bad over the last decade that we've managed to simultaneously make virtually all infrastructure worse and raise taxes to one of the highest levels they've ever been.
 
Normally I'd agree, but spending has been so bad over the last decade that we've managed to simultaneously make virtually all infrastructure worse and raise taxes to one of the highest levels they've ever been.

I am honestly shocked that Joel and Avram Glazer are not in charge of the UK.
 
You're right. Let's just accept that politicians never need to have any integrity or stand by their beliefs or promises. They should just be able to flip flop around constantly on any issue, and then gaslight people into thinking they're not doing that

Your learning!...I have a lifetime of such experiences, yet I still amble along to the polling booth at Election time. Why you might ask? (or not)... because now and again you come across that rare politician who isn't grandstanding, and does believe in what they saying (even if I disagreed) and does carry out what they say they will. Maggie Thatcher was one.... however beliefs more acceptable to me, were Frank Field and the late Tony Lloyd.
 
Nope, she's in the right party right now. Labour under Starmer is just Tories 2.

Starmers constant flip flopping simply shows the lack of integrity the guy has. His opinions are all based on political feedback rather than his own beliefs.

Starmer is a populist like so many of the current politicians.

Sounds as if they're preparing the public to say they're not going to do anything because there's no money and they've no idea how to get the country moving forward or grow the economy. Starmer, Reeves, Streeting, Cooper - don't inspire much hope.

"At least we're not the Tories" will be what they'll run on, despite writing his 5 mission fantasy waffle, version 3 or 4, lost track. they're all roughly the same but the latest one has a large photo of Starmer in a camouflage jacket.
 
Last edited:
You're right. Let's just accept that politicians never need to have any integrity or stand by their beliefs or promises. They should just be able to flip flop around constantly on any issue, and then gaslight people into thinking they're not doing that

Isn't that exactly the problem that Corbyn had, however? He was so rigid in his positions and beliefs (as laudible as some were), that he was easily skewered by the press and opponents for his inflexibility (see: Brexit, the Middle East, etc)? Pragmatism isn't a bad thing.
 
Isn't that exactly the problem that Corbyn had, however? He was so rigid in his positions and beliefs (as laudible as some were), that he was easily skewered by the press and opponents for his inflexibility (see: Brexit, the Middle East, etc)? Pragmatism isn't a bad thing.

Pragmatism good. Complete abandonment of anything you've ever believed in, or indeed campaigned on, not so good.
 
Isn't that exactly the problem that Corbyn had, however? He was so rigid in his positions and beliefs (as laudible as some were), that he was easily skewered by the press and opponents for his inflexibility (see: Brexit, the Middle East, etc)? Pragmatism isn't a bad thing.
Corbyn would have been skewered by the press whatever he said or did. What is the point in playing on the fence mealy mouthed politics when they're just going to lie and misrepresent you anyway? They consistently did that to him even when he had actual positions that could have been fairly criticised
 
The Israel has the right to commit war crimes guy has stepped back onto the stage for his encore.


The spineless coward has definitely seen the clip, he just can't bring himself to admit the obvious fact that it was a war crime at risk of upsetting the likes of Rachel Riley and Luciana Berger.

It's ok though, he'll wheel out his usual lip service as to how Palestinians probably do deserve a state.
 
Am I the only person who would rather have properly funded, NHS, Education System, Police Force, and Welfare System than lower taxes?
No, you're not. I actually like safety nets in society. I like the idea of knowing I could get a doctor's appointment if and when I need one.