ShinjiNinja26
Full Member
Why bother with this though? It's something you can't prove. It just makes you look like a jealous, bitter little child.
Liverpool won the league. Get over it.
Why you so rattled?

Why bother with this though? It's something you can't prove. It just makes you look like a jealous, bitter little child.
Liverpool won the league. Get over it.
Good post.Watford had just burst your bubble and you were clearly running on fumes. City are a different beast in the final months of the season.
Also you're missing the main point. The pandemic was brewing for several months before the league was stopped. It gave you the incentive to keep going after a flying start because everyone knew the league could be off at any moment. So for months you didn't have to overthink it because every game could've been the last. That gave you 10+ cheap wins between December-March simply because of the looming pandemic. Likewise that was demotivating for City and they dropped points they never would've in a regular season. I mean we were crap for most of the season yet still found a way to do the double over them. That never happens in a normal season.
You lucked out with the fact that the world decided to shut down the one year you had a rapid start. Everything that happened from December onwards was a farce and you simply took full advantage of it (fair play for doing that). But it's really beyond delusion to think that you could have a 22 point lead on City (not 25 as you conveniently left out their game in hand) under normal circumstances. Pep has finished ahead of you in all other seasons yet we're supposed to believe he was 22 points worse than you in that one covid riddled year. Right. Makes total sense.
In a completely normal season you would've at best been 5 points ahead of them with 10 games to go and you would've bottled it like you have in every non-covid year.
One season that is one of the greatest achievements in the history of professional team sports though.Yeah sure
Couldn't win anything with a Chelsea side that Mourinho turned almost unbeatable right after. Got sacked by Leicester midway through the season because they were one place above the relegation zone. The less said about his Watford period the better I guess.
Top 5 all-time for one season!
Why you so rattled?The only pathetic thing here is you defending our bitter rivals. Whether they won it fair and square isn’t the point here.
I'm rattled? Nah, not really. I accept they won the league. I got over it. I'm happy. You? You've willingly had this pointless argument that will never end ever since they won the league.
Yeah, I'm the one that's rattled.
Proper mayhem in here.
I’m also well over it. The point you seem to be missing is this is all a wind up that rattles the scousers cage but judging by the tone of your posts it seems to rattle yours as well.
See there again thinking I'm rattled. You seem adamant on wanting me to be rattled.
Judging by the authors its mostly former rather than the latter. It seems they had it easy, caught few big ones.Hard to differentiate the people who are just winding up our handful of resident scousers from those who genuinely think their title should be asterisked.
Judging by the authors its mostly former rather than the latter.
True that.I tend to agree, but given how daft some opinions are on here at times, we can never be 100% certain.
You’re the one that initially replied claiming I was a jealous, bitter little child. That’s quite a strong response from someone that doesn’t care. Anyways I won’t bog down this thread any further with this. Cheer up lad it’s just a little wind up on the scousers which is always fun.![]()
But when you think about it people are always walking right before they fall.![]()
So you're saying that despite Liverpool being 25 points ahead with 9 games left, under normal circumstances (no Covid) City would have clawed that back and Liverpool would've collapsed? A Liverpool team with 27 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss from 29 games?
Do you genuinely believe that football stopping due to Covid in March 2020 impacted the outcome of the title "race" that season?
Liverpool were top on 82 points from 29 games, with City in 2nd on 57.
You can dress it up any way you like but there will always be an asterisk next to that Liverpool title win.
Wtf happened to City that season.
They had an incredible amount of luck that year.
Some of the things that happened in their game beggars belief.
In a game vs Everton, van Dijk shanked it, and most thought it was going out of play. But due to the wind, it ended up bouncing on the crossbar and then onto Origi's head and into the back of the net. It was in injury time as well. Imagine that but for the first 29 games of the season.
Liverpool raced into such a big lead early doors that even their trick of putting together a near perfect second half of the season wouldn't have helped. So they thought feck it and focussed on the other competitions.
Plus they were knackered from scoring 198 points in two seasons. The same way Liverpool were shot to pieces the next season after a similar number of points over their two seasons.
They experienced an insane amount of luck that season in the first 29 games: scarcely believable deflections and opposition mistakes leading to goals; late, late winners which they didn’t deserve; opposition injuries to key players in the lead-up to Liverpool games… basically their greatest hits all rolled in one perfect 29-game storm for them.I have very little recollection of that season, but feck me, I didn't realise Liverpool went so far ahead.
You do know that there is no such thing as luck?They experienced an insane amount of luck that season in the first 29 games: scarcely believable deflections and opposition mistakes leading to goals; late, late winners which they didn’t deserve; opposition injuries to key players in the lead-up to Liverpool games… basically their greatest hits all rolled in one perfect 29-game storm for them.
I can vividly recall the following madcap incidents to benefit them straight off the top of my head from that season: Wijnaldum’s jammy winner away to Sheffield United (Henderson howler); Milner’s 95th minute winning penalty v Leicester the following week; their two goals in injury-time to beat Villa 2-1 away when a loss looked certain; Firmino’s late winners v Wolves and Palace… it was an absurd run of lack in a period when they weren’t dominating teams the way City would typically.
They were definitely good enough to be in the title race that season but to think they had 82/87 maximum points available by the shutdown was one of the most utterly bizarre things we’ll ever see in football. Even the Leicester title win wasn’t as fanciful as that Liverpool streak.
About the only stat not available in football. Liverpool would be top of that stat every season.They experienced an insane amount of luck that season in the first 29 games: scarcely believable deflections and opposition mistakes leading to goals; late, late winners which they didn’t deserve; opposition injuries to key players in the lead-up to Liverpool games… basically their greatest hits all rolled in one perfect 29-game storm for them.
I can vividly recall the following madcap incidents to benefit them straight off the top of my head from that season: Wijnaldum’s jammy winner away to Sheffield United (Henderson howler); Milner’s 95th minute winning penalty v Leicester the following week; their two goals in injury-time to beat Villa 2-1 away when a loss looked certain; Firmino’s late winners v Wolves and Palace… it was an absurd run of lack in a period when they weren’t dominating teams the way City would typically.
They were definitely good enough to be in the title race that season but to think they had 82/87 maximum points available by the shutdown was one of the most utterly bizarre things we’ll ever see in football. Even the Leicester title win wasn’t as fanciful as that Liverpool streak.
Couple of things here.They experienced an insane amount of luck that season in the first 29 games: scarcely believable deflections and opposition mistakes leading to goals; late, late winners which they didn’t deserve; opposition injuries to key players in the lead-up to Liverpool games… basically their greatest hits all rolled in one perfect 29-game storm for them.
I can vividly recall the following madcap incidents to benefit them straight off the top of my head from that season: Wijnaldum’s jammy winner away to Sheffield United (Henderson howler); Milner’s 95th minute winning penalty v Leicester the following week; their two goals in injury-time to beat Villa 2-1 away when a loss looked certain; Firmino’s late winners v Wolves and Palace… it was an absurd run of lack in a period when they weren’t dominating teams the way City would typically.
They were definitely good enough to be in the title race that season but to think they had 82/87 maximum points available by the shutdown was one of the most utterly bizarre things we’ll ever see in football. Even the Leicester title win wasn’t as fanciful as that Liverpool streak.
We deserved to win the league that season, and by a distance as well.
The ironic thing is that season wasn’t even your best under him. You just kept grinding out wins late in games. To be fair the way city performed that season you could of got away with dropping as many points as you wantSo you're saying that despite Liverpool being 25 points ahead with 9 games left, under normal circumstances (no Covid) City would have clawed that back and Liverpool would've collapsed? A Liverpool team with 27 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss from 29 games?
What?You do know that there is no such thing as luck?
Anyone saying he has underachieved is talking absolute cr*p. He finished 2nd with 97 points got Liverpool to 2 CL finals and won them there first PL all while competing with a team that just buys who they want and when they want.
Liverpool where exactly where we are now when he took over and literally took them to challenging every year.
I don’t mind saying the above as he is leaving and I think Neville was right last night when he said he is overachieving with that squad this season as they certainly on paper are not that strong and feel a big drop off no matter the manager who takes over
The pandemic was met with wildly different reactions from clubs, which is why that season very much deserves an asterisk. Some clubs took huge precautions because the severity of COVID was relatively unknown. Others didn't and were able to capitalize on the fact that many clubs were holding back. Some clubs were heavily hit by players getting sick, others were lucky enough to remain largely unaffected.
While the title from that season does count, it is absolutely fair to acknowledge the strong likelihood that Liverpool won it precisely because of the pandemic and the way it threw the whole season into complete disarray. It caused a situation where nobody else challenged for the title at all because it was anyone's guess what the consequences of going 'business as usual' might be.
In some ways, it could be called mildly irresponsible to approach it as an opportunity to snag an easy title while the world grappled with not just the disease itself but also the many people who refused to take precautions against it. Not a great example for a major sporting institution to set. I wouldn't go so far as to say that Liverpool contributed to things like the anti-mask movement, that would certainly be overstating the case; but many clubs held back and took every possible precaution exactly because of the potential optics of not doing so, given what society was dealing with in that regard.
For that reason, that year's title is worth the least of any PL title ever won.
Good effort, you might actually snag a few with this post. The sporting institution bit was possibly gilding the lily, but a sterling attempt nonetheless!The pandemic was met with wildly different reactions from clubs, which is why that season very much deserves an asterisk. Some clubs took huge precautions because the severity of COVID was relatively unknown. Others didn't and were able to capitalize on the fact that many clubs were holding back. Some clubs were heavily hit by players getting sick, others were lucky enough to remain largely unaffected.
While the title from that season does count, it is absolutely fair to acknowledge the strong likelihood that Liverpool won it precisely because of the pandemic and the way it threw the whole season into complete disarray. It caused a situation where nobody else challenged for the title at all because it was anyone's guess what the consequences of going 'business as usual' might be.
In some ways, it could be called mildly irresponsible to approach it as an opportunity to snag an easy title while the world grappled with not just the disease itself but also the many people who refused to take precautions against it. Not a great example for a major sporting institution to set. I wouldn't go so far as to say that Liverpool contributed to things like the anti-mask movement, that would certainly be overstating the case; but many clubs held back and took every possible precaution exactly because of the potential optics of not doing so, given what society was dealing with in that regard.
For that reason, that year's title is worth the least of any PL title ever won.