Synco
Lucio's #1 Fan
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Messages
- 6,726
Like you said Klopp took the club to the last place in the table. He was going to get fired regardless. Firing him in the middle of the season would probably mean that no decent coach would be available. Klopp is good enough to recover from relegation, obviously. Season was a write off. BVB made the sensible choice of keeping him when no good could really come from letting him go mid season. At the end of the season though, he grossly under performed and he would've been let go. There is no need to get so emotionally disturbed about it.
I'll believe a simple fact that managers at the start of the season have targets and when they don't meet them, they are usually let go. Some clubs sack, other do a mutual understanding and in Klopp's case, it was his resignation. Of course I could be completely off.
You are just applying generic football wisdom to a situation you seem to know nothing specific about.
The relationship that developed between Klopp and the club during his time there was much more than the usual "deliver results or get replaced". Much more. He surely wouldn't have been dismissed, just like Arsene Wenger or SAF wouldn't have gotten fired by their clubs after a severe crisis. Especially after the turnaround of the second half of the season (regarding points, Dortmund was almost on par with Leverkusen and Bayern during that period and reached the Cup final).
I'm sure you won't believe it, but frankly, you can't have followed much more than the matches themselves, let alone Dortmund's history since 2005/2008.