Jurgen Klopp Sack Watch

R2hrNt3.png




Firmino getting the last touch. Lallana clearly interfering with play. No doubt about the offside.

Que ? Are we watching different videos ?
 
Didn't you lose ground on the top four? You moved closer on 5th but Spurs in 2nd and Arsenal in 4th gained two points on United.
Yes, there is slight revisionism in saying that a draw suited us (if anyone has made that claim, not sure). We needed, and wanted, a win. Liverpool are probably happy with a draw, all things considered. With that said, given that both clubs lost ground at the weekend relative to the others in the top 6, a draw really suited neither.

With that said, a draw is neither chatastrophic nor season-ending. 17 more matches to go, and top 4 is still attainable for both teams, and perhaps the title still for LFC, although I don't think anyone will catch Chelsea to be honest.

I said before, we should have just swapped victories!
 
Agree with this and the guy above who favours the daylight rule. I'm getting tired of pundits highlighting how a player is leaning offside and therefore the lino is technically correct in flagging him. It would probably help the officials if the rule was changed back to the daylight interpretation, decisions would be more obvious and there would be less need for guessing.



I think you mean a moot point. Not being pedantic (it may well have been a typo), just trying to save you from that uncomfortable moment in real life when someone turns to you and says "did you say MUTE point!!!". Also you reminded me of Joey Tribbiani's moo point, still funny.
Speed typing on phone matey was a mistake I know it's moot but I did write mute ha, meh gave the guy a chance to reply on my grammar mistake rather than carry on the debate.
I thought the same ha
 
Better team uh.. Klopp?
I haven't really said my bit about the game (just been generally, and understandably, wumming :p ). But my thoughts:

1. I would have snapped your arm and shoulder off for a draw before kickoff. Even when we scored I was hoping it would be enough to hold on for a draw (a win would be nice obviously but I wanted to manage expectations). On balance, and despite what my fellow fans and Klopp are saying, we were definitely lucky with just a draw.

2. I wish Klopp would stop talking about long balls and deserving to win against a long ball team. Its making him look silly, even if it may be mind games (which I don't think it is as there is no point). Mourinho on the other hand has surprised me, I was expecting a lot more histrionics and comments other than us 'being defensive'. Maybe he's letting Klopp continue digging while no one questions Utd still being 6th.

3. The players I feared before kickoff were Mata (really clever player, loves scoring against us), Rashford (crazy legs pace and composed assisting) and Fellaini (clever movement to win headers inside and outside the box). One cost us the win (Fellaini), one didn't play and one came on when the game went long ball. It could have been worse for us so maybe a mistake there by Mourinho.

4. Utd will win a lot of games with the players they have as long they are not pressed. This will be particularly useful as they have a long run of easy games coming up in which they will definitely not be pressed.

Wow! A balanced view from Liverpool fan. Am I dreaming? :eek:

On the bolded. Definitely. If someone didn't watch the match and look only at highlight they will think it's United who dominated the match. 3 or 4 great chances in the 1st half alone vs. a Liverpool gifted penalty.
Most United fans though think a draw is deserved.. because we can't play our game due to pressing. And that's alright. Liverpool played very disciplined and the players gave it all (more than ours). We are showing though, despite the difficulty, we're still able to create chances (I don't know anyone noticed but Mhiki involved in our best 3 chances of the match. He's really creative), and that is a good sign.

On 4. Yes. We're having problems when pressed. This game and City game show the flaw in our team. Hopefully Mourinho can learn and adapt to beat this system for once.
 
Last edited:
Better team uh.. Klopp?


Wow! A balanced view from Liverpool fan. Am I dreaming? :eek:

On the bolded. Definitely. If someone didn't watch the match and look only at highlight they will think it's United who dominated the match. 3 or 4 great chances in the 1st half alone vs. a Liverpool gifted penalty.
Most United fans though think a draw is deserved.. because we can't play our game due to pressing. And that's alright. Liverpool played very disciplined and the players gave it all (more than ours). We are showing though, despite the difficulty, we're still able to create chances (I don't know anyone noticed but Mhiki involved in our best 3 chances of the match. He's really creative), and that is a good sign.

On 4. Yes. We're having problems when pressed. This game and City game show the flaw in our team. Hopefully Mourinho can learn and adapt to beat this system for once.

The pressing issue isn't just something that Mourinho can 'learn' to combat this season. He will need the players to enable his vision if that is the case. When he bought Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Mikhy in the summer my very first thought was they won't run much*. Now you add your best controlling midfielder in there (Carrick) and that's even less running. Managers choose their strategies early and have to live and die by it. The lack of finishing is hurting too obviously and that has taken everyone by surprise, even me. Pleasantly in my case. :)

What Mourinho could do is drop Pogba, Ibra and Carrick for the remaining top 6 games, replacing them with workhorses, but can you imagine the uproar if that happened. So Jose is sort of stuck with his choices for now.

*I'm qualifying this by saying these players are super fit but not quite geared to the the type of football that some teams play. Mikhy has played for Dortmund but he's not quite a Lallana type, for example. Vice versa, Lallana is nowhere as talented as Mikhy either.
 
I seem to remember Klopp coming out and criticising Jose for stifling the game at Anfield. Yet Klopp then did the same at OT on Sunday. Plus he comes out with the long ball shite when in reality Liverpool played a few themselves.
Personally I don't mind long balls if they have a point to them or the fact teams shut up shop. But I do think Klopp has a selective memory and as much as I like him he comes over as a bitter man who refuses to acknowledge what actually happens and only is ever going to agree with his own perspective.
Well I didn't see a game anything like Anfield and the long ball is a viable tactic under certain circumstances - of which the high press is one, especially when United have players and tall and powerful as Ibra, Pogba and Fellaini. I don't agree with Klopp criticising that, probably he was just very emotional after having surrendered a victory with 10 mins to go, that's not an excuse, just a reasonable explanation. As he says himself, if you ask him the next day he'll often give you a different, more measured response.
 
A Liverpool fan daring to accuse us/redcafe of hypocrisy? Seriously? Where do we even BEGIN with your lot! Stevie starfishs diving? Suarez? The mental gymnastics you put yourselves through to defend your players is hilarious.

It's not a coincidence that Klopp is the new "can do no wrong!" man that will be forgiven for being a lovable scamp for anything he does from now on. Even when he acts like a lunatic. Or parks the bus.
LoL oh dear. Good luck trying to make it to the mains with posts of that quality. There is so much there to be torn to pieces but really, with the acumen you've displayed in that post, it's really not worth it.
 
Depends on a lot of factors. e.g. did your position 10 yards off side influence the defender and so on. But you could easily make the case, and I suspect this is how it would go in real-life, that the defender slicing it constitutes a deliberate touch, and therefore starts a new phase of offside where the players in your scenario is actually onside.
Yeah good point. I hadn't thought of that scenario applying to that situation but it could be a viable explanation.
 
The pressing issue isn't just something that Mourinho can 'learn' to combat this season. He will need the players to enable his vision if that is the case. When he bought Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Mikhy in the summer my very first thought was they won't run much*. Now you add your best controlling midfielder in there (Carrick) and that's even less running. Managers choose their strategies early and have to live and die by it. The lack of finishing is hurting too obviously and that has taken everyone by surprise, even me. Pleasantly in my case. :)

What Mourinho could do is drop Pogba, Ibra and Carrick for the remaining top 6 games, replacing them with workhorses, but can you imagine the uproar if that happened. So Jose is sort of stuck with his choices for now.

*I'm qualifying this by saying these players are super fit but not quite geared to the the type of football that some teams play. Mikhy has played for Dortmund but he's not quite a Lallana type, for example. Vice versa, Lallana is nowhere as talented as Mikhy either.

We only need to change personnel if we want to match a press with a press. That's one option, but its clear the Mourinho doesn't favour pressing from the front other than in isolated bursts, I dont see him building a team like that. The other is simply to bypass the press by sending the ball over the top of the press. In both the City and the Liverpool games we switched to that at half time and in both matches it changed the tide of the game (though sadly not the result vs City).

Playing it long may not be pretty, but then neither is two teams pressing each other. Sometimes winnings all that matters.
 
Am I missing anything about the uproar about this?

Mou played defensively at Anfield; United-fans applauded him, Pool-fans laughed.
Klopp played defensively at OT; Liverpool-fans applauded him, United-fans laughed.

To claim that either side is hypocritical without aknowledging the fact that they are so themselves is quite silly.

Long balls have a place in the game, spesifically when dealing with an immense pressure in the opposition half like Liverpool are very good at. There is one sure way to counter this pressure without risking the ball in dangerous positions, and that is aiming the ball at the massive man you have upfront. It's a way of dealing with a certain thread, just the same as playing it out from the back/applying high pressure/parking the bus/whatever.

I'm certain that neither side were satisfied with how the game turned out, as we both know that the teams can play much better than we both showed. Draw is a bit of a 'meh' result for either side, and it's silly for anyone to claim some sort of moral victory.
Indeed that is the right assessment. Some posters just don't like it no matter how you coat it though.

One point that needs to be pointed out - when people say their team didn't play well - is that they fail to acknowledge the influence of the opposition in that equation. Often in these high profile matches between top teams, that often fail to live up to their billing, it's simply because they are both very good teams that much of their work is nullified by the opposition due to their quality. Due credit is rarely given (by any opposition fan) to the other team in these scenarios, it's always 'you were lucky we didn't play to our usual / current high standard'.
 
We only need to change personnel if we want to match a press with a press. That's one option, but its clear the Mourinho doesn't favour pressing from the front other than in isolated bursts, I dont see him building a team like that. The other is simply to bypass the press by sending the ball over the top of the press. In both the City and the Liverpool games we switched to that at half time and in both matches it changed the tide of the game (though sadly not the result vs City).

Playing it long may not be pretty, but then neither is two teams pressing each other. Sometimes winnings all that matters.

Pressing isn't pretty full stop, it can destroy a match. Not sure why it's labeled as so much more dignified than sending the ball long. Both are almost equally as destructive to the quality of a football match.
 
Moderators were probably bored and tired of this thread so they moved it into the Football forum subsection (less viewers and posters) :lol:
 
Yes, there is slight revisionism in saying that a draw suited us (if anyone has made that claim, not sure). We needed, and wanted, a win. Liverpool are probably happy with a draw, all things considered. With that said, given that both clubs lost ground at the weekend relative to the others in the top 6, a draw really suited neither.

With that said, a draw is neither chatastrophic nor season-ending. 17 more matches to go, and top 4 is still attainable for both teams, and perhaps the title still for LFC, although I don't think anyone will catch Chelsea to be honest.

I said before, we should have just swapped victories!
Someone said it - forget who.

Definitely a draw at OT is never a result to turn your nose up at. And it needs it be taken into context - it doesn't matter what Chelsea did at Leicester if in the respective return fixtures we win at Leicester and United beat Chelsea at OT. We will have gained a point.
 
The pressing issue isn't just something that Mourinho can 'learn' to combat this season. He will need the players to enable his vision if that is the case. When he bought Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Mikhy in the summer my very first thought was they won't run much*. Now you add your best controlling midfielder in there (Carrick) and that's even less running. Managers choose their strategies early and have to live and die by it. The lack of finishing is hurting too obviously and that has taken everyone by surprise, even me. Pleasantly in my case. :)

What Mourinho could do is drop Pogba, Ibra and Carrick for the remaining top 6 games, replacing them with workhorses, but can you imagine the uproar if that happened. So Jose is sort of stuck with his choices for now.

*I'm qualifying this by saying these players are super fit but not quite geared to the the type of football that some teams play. Mikhy has played for Dortmund but he's not quite a Lallana type, for example. Vice versa, Lallana is nowhere as talented as Mikhy either.

I see what you're saying but I very much doubt Jose would make such changes simply to combat a Liverpool side that has still failed to score a goal against us from open play. .

United can play their way and Liverpool can play theirs. We are unbeaten in 16 games and have the joint PL top scorer so we must be doing something right although there are always areas to improve upon.

I expect we will add a midfielder in the summer considering the links we had with Kante.
 
Indeed that is the right assessment. Some posters just don't like it no matter how you coat it though.

One point that needs to be pointed out - when people say their team didn't play well - is that they fail to acknowledge the influence of the opposition in that equation. Often in these high profile matches between top teams, that often fail to live up to their billing, it's simply because they are both very good teams that much of their work is nullified by the opposition due to their quality. Due credit is rarely given (by any opposition fan) to the other team in these scenarios, it's always 'you were lucky we didn't play to our usual / current high standard'.

Obviously you won't get the same freedom and can't play the same game against different opposition. Some people say that Martial has had a bad game but I remember 2-3 Liverpool players around him whenever he was on the ball, that definitely affected his game (or Lallana on Carrick).

Pogba had a really bad game, and I don't think this was due to the game being against Liverpool.

I generally think Klopp did a great job in setting your team to nullify our strengths. I think a lot of our fans don't give credit to you mainly because of his post-match comments.
 
I generally think Klopp did a great job in setting your team to nullify our strengths. I think a lot of our fans don't give credit to you mainly because of his post-match comments.

Agreed. Klopp talked absolute dross at the end so no one is going to give him any praise.

In addition the way the scouse had a go at Jose for totally nulifiying them at Anfield then they come and play like that at OT kind of makes it all a bit hypocritical.
 
Agreed. In fact since the advantage is supposed to be to the attacking team .... and rarely is it given ... I'd prefer the rules to say that an attacker has to be 'clearly' offside for offside to be given (or returning from an offside position). As in daylight between the attacker and the last defender, not mm or ins. That wouldn't lessen the controversies but it would encourage more attacking play and see more goals.
The rules are more or less like that since refs and linesman aren't supposed to make a call unless they're sure about it.
 
Agreed. Klopp talked absolute dross at the end so no one is going to give him any praise.

In addition the way the scouse had a go at Jose for totally nulifiying them at Anfield then they come and play like that at OT kind of makes it all a bit hypocritical.

He is clearly frustrated and rightly so. They came to OT playing for a draw, got a lucky penalty and couldn't hold on to the lead.
 
Also, herrera is a little dick.

But klopps antics were a bit embarrassing. When I first heard conflict on the sidelines, I thought they'd have been at each others throats, really going for each other.

Instead, I saw klopp, with very controlled anger, doing a 'hold me back' attack on mourinho and always positioning himself behind the fourth official whilst still maintaining the look of a mad dog.

What was the point?
Klopp is very aware of himself and play's up to the camera all the time.
 
Klopp is very aware of himself and play's up to the camera all the time.
I keep reading this but it's utter bullshit imo. A manager being fanatic and theatrical along the sideline doesn't necessarily mean he's aware of the cameras, it just means he's passionate. He can't possible know what is being broadcast, and he's way too involved during the game to give a single feck about some cameras being pointed at him. As he should be.

I agree that he knows how to play up to the media (and fans) before and after games, but I don't believe for a moment that he does the things he does during the game to attract attention.
 
I keep reading this but it's utter bullshit imo. A manager being fanatic and theatrical along the sideline doesn't necessarily mean he's aware of the cameras, it just means he's passionate. He can't possible know what is being broadcast, and he's way too involved during the game to give a single feck about some cameras being pointed at him. As he should be.

I agree that he knows how to play up to the media (and fans) before and after games, but I don't believe for a moment that he does the things he does during the game to attract attention.
How do you know that, if he plays up for the media before and after the game it's very possible he does it sometimes during games too.
 
I keep reading this but it's utter bullshit imo. A manager being fanatic and theatrical along the sideline doesn't necessarily mean he's aware of the cameras, it just means he's passionate. He can't possible know what is being broadcast, and he's way too involved during the game to give a single feck about some cameras being pointed at him. As he should be.

I agree that he knows how to play up to the media (and fans) before and after games, but I don't believe for a moment that he does the things he does during the game to attract attention.
I disagree with that. Klopp knows exactly what he is doing and when to play up to camera's during games. And more so than any other manager.
 
How do you know that, if he plays up for the media before and after the game it's very possible he does it sometimes during games too.
Because he's way too invested in games to care about stuff like that. Besides, from the 95mins that a football game lasts, the cameras are probably on the managers for around one minute. You think, while trying to coach his side, trying to adjust to the game situation and numerous other things he has to do during a PL game, he has time to think about how he should act, for the less than 1% probability that the cameras might effectively be on him at that particular moment? No chance. Managers like Conte and him are all about passion and emotion on the pitch and it has nothing to do with trying to act in a particular way for the media to take notice.

I disagree with that. Klopp knows exactly what he is doing and when to play up to camera's during games. And more so than any other manager.
Go on believing that if you really want to.
 
Because he's way too invested in games to care about stuff like that. Besides, from the 95mins that a football game lasts, the cameras are probably on the managers for around one minute. You think, while trying to coach his side, trying to adjust to the game situation and numerous other things he has to do during a PL game, he has time to think about how he should act, for the less than 1% probability that the cameras might effectively be on him at that particular moment? No chance. Managers like Conte and him are all about passion and emotion on the pitch and it has nothing to do with trying to act in a particular way for the media to take notice.


Go on believing that if you really want to.
So during a game he's all about passion but after and prior to the game he acts up for the camera. During a game he just switches off?

Same as you said to @Red Katie, go on believing that if you want to.
 
So during a game he's all about passion but after and prior to the game he acts up for the camera. During a game he just switches off?

Same as you said to @Red Katie, go on believing that if you want to.
He doesn't switch off, he switches to game mode. If I play football, I give my all during those 90mins but before and after the game you can be friends with the opposition and all should be forgiven. I really don't know what's so hard to understand about that.
 
He doesn't switch off, he switches to game mode. If I play football, I give my all during those 90mins but before and after the game you can be friends with the opposition and all should be forgiven. I really don't know what's so hard to understand about that.
Well you play football like that, some don't. It's nothing to understand or not understand, it's your opinion with which I don't agree with.
 
Well you play football like that, some don't. It's nothing to understand or not understand, it's your opinion with which I don't agree with.
So you really think that, in the 90th minute of a passionate derby, after an opposing player committed a blatant foul that denied us a counter-attack, he thought by himself: "feck, this is my chance to play up to the cameras, let's go berserk against the fourth official and Mourinho so everyone will be talking about me after the game"? Because that's what Red Katie was implying.
 
Excellent research to put away a pathetically misguided claim.

People complaining about the offisde... There was an offside missed directly leading to the corner where Liverpool scored. Surprise surprise not one hoot about that.

It has been mentioned in other threads. Ive read and seen pundits say it wasn't offside as he never touched it.
 
So you really think that, in the 90th minute of a passionate derby, after an opposing player committed a blatant foul that denied us a counter-attack, he thought by himself: "feck, this is my chance to play up to the cameras, let's go berserk against the fourth official and Mourinho so everyone will be talking about me after the game"? Because that's what Red Katie was implying.
He did make a meal of it. It's one thing to be angry about it which I get, it's another to act like a clown about it which he did.
 
He did make a meal of it. It's one thing to be angry about it which I get, it's another to act like a clown about it which he did.
If he was trying to play up to the cameras, why would he be acting like a madman whilst doing it? Makes absolutely no sense.
 
Indeed that is the right assessment. Some posters just don't like it no matter how you coat it though.

One point that needs to be pointed out - when people say their team didn't play well - is that they fail to acknowledge the influence of the opposition in that equation. Often in these high profile matches between top teams, that often fail to live up to their billing, it's simply because they are both very good teams that much of their work is nullified by the opposition due to their quality. Due credit is rarely given (by any opposition fan) to the other team in these scenarios, it's always 'you were lucky we didn't play to our usual / current high standard'.

Yup
 
Well I didn't see a game anything like Anfield and the long ball is a viable tactic under certain circumstances - of which the high press is one, especially when United have players and tall and powerful as Ibra, Pogba and Fellaini. I don't agree with Klopp criticising that, probably he was just very emotional after having surrendered a victory with 10 mins to go, that's not an excuse, just a reasonable explanation. As he says himself, if you ask him the next day he'll often give you a different, more measured response.

As you say he should learn from that then and just say I will tell you tomorrow as today I am not best placed to give you an unbiased view lol fair enough
 
I see what you're saying but I very much doubt Jose would make such changes simply to combat a Liverpool side that has still failed to score a goal against us from open play. .

United can play their way and Liverpool can play theirs. We are unbeaten in 16 games and have the joint PL top scorer so we must be doing something right although there are always areas to improve upon.

I expect we will add a midfielder in the summer considering the links we had with Kante.

Its not just the game, or games, against Liverpool though. Utd sit comfortably at the bottom of the top 6 league table and comfortably in 6th place in the league table overall despite any good run of form. A Kante type would be ideal for Utd's midfield, the fact you don't already have one even with all the riches is yet another mistake imo. Klopp's made his too (not buying CBs, not enough midfield cover, etc) but Liverpool have fewer games to play this season and shown no problems with top 6 teams to give him some benefit of the doubt.
 
R2hrNt3.png




Firmino getting the last touch. Lallana clearly interfering with play. No doubt about the offside.

Sure Fimino making that pass to Lallana and Lallana attacking the ball from an offside position technically could have been given offside. We can't just bring up offsides, minor fouls etc. in build up to argue against the validity of a goal. I suspect these marginal offside calls go unnoticed plenty of times during a game and based on technicalities we'd be ruling out a big proportion of goals.

We had a fair chance to defend a corner which we bottled so it's our own doing.
 
I said a draw was fine for Utd, keeps the momentum moving forward. Keeps us in contact with everyone apart from Chelsea. It's fine, it's not as good as winning but it's fine. Not 'mighty fine' in the American sense, just comfortably OK in the wussy English sense.

Didn't mean it as being totally tremendous or anything. A loss would have sent two teams totally away from us & lost ground on 2 more. Losing would have been real bad is what I am feeling.

I believe Klopp's general touchline character is half-planned in the generic sense. I don't suppose he pre-plans every reaction but you're not telling me he doesn't realise the extrvagant celebrations and constant presence in the technical area aren't effective tools in building a positive rapport with the LFC support, in order to get a beneficial & increased supportive response from the LFC support. He talks about building an overall identity doesn't he? For the 90 minutes he is an actor in a role, if you like, it fulfils a (designed) purpose. SAF used to do it, I'd say the irate charge down from the dugout got to be SAF's trademark in the later years, and would have an effect.
 


Feckwits.

I think Klopp is actually considering to let him play tomorrow, might advance the situation a bit.
 
I said a draw was fine for Utd, keeps the momentum moving forward. Keeps us in contact with everyone apart from Chelsea. It's fine, it's not as good as winning but it's fine. Not 'mighty fine' in the American sense, just comfortably OK in the wussy English sense.

Didn't mean it as being totally tremendous or anything. A loss would have sent two teams totally away from us & lost ground on 2 more. Losing would have been real bad is what I am feeling.

I believe Klopp's general touchline character is half-planned in the generic sense. I don't suppose he pre-plans every reaction but you're not telling me he doesn't realise the extrvagant celebrations and constant presence in the technical area aren't effective tools in building a positive rapport with the LFC support, in order to get a beneficial & increased supportive response from the LFC support. He talks about building an overall identity doesn't he? For the 90 minutes he is an actor in a role, if you like, it fulfils a (designed) purpose. SAF used to do it, I'd say the irate charge down from the dugout got to be SAF's trademark in the later years, and would have an effect.
Agree with you, particularly on the draw
 
The pressing issue isn't just something that Mourinho can 'learn' to combat this season. He will need the players to enable his vision if that is the case. When he bought Ibrahimovic, Pogba and Mikhy in the summer my very first thought was they won't run much*. Now you add your best controlling midfielder in there (Carrick) and that's even less running. Managers choose their strategies early and have to live and die by it. The lack of finishing is hurting too obviously and that has taken everyone by surprise, even me. Pleasantly in my case. :)

What Mourinho could do is drop Pogba, Ibra and Carrick for the remaining top 6 games, replacing them with workhorses, but can you imagine the uproar if that happened. So Jose is sort of stuck with his choices for now.

*I'm qualifying this by saying these players are super fit but not quite geared to the the type of football that some teams play. Mikhy has played for Dortmund but he's not quite a Lallana type, for example. Vice versa, Lallana is nowhere as talented as Mikhy either.

Great reply. Putting it like this I have to agree. We won't stop struggling against this kind of team soon. (I wanted to reply to your post sooner but my credit ran out. :p)

Now seeing you are Liverpool fan and have a very good understanding of the game. Could you explain to me, since I rarely watch Liverpool this season, Why Liverpool didn't have good record against teams outside top 6?
I know your defense is weak, so anyone playing you will always have a few chances, like we had. And your goal keepers are a bit suspected. But what is really Liverpool problem finishing weaker teams off? And why is that? Seeing your weaker team (No Matip, Mané, Coutinho for long period) played very disciplined against our strongest side makes me wonder.