Jurgen Klopp Sack Watch

I don't think it started out that way - iirc it began early in their ownership, before it became clear what a couple of cnuts they were. Did it (the rafatollah) not just start out as a bit of fun?
I think it was a direct response to rumblings around his job security.
 
That exact post could have been written by a Liverpool fan in the early 90's.
Liverpool were never as big as we are now.
During their slump they never went out and bought arguably the best players in France / Germany / Italy. Nor get a Mourinho level manager in.
Imagine they bought Zidane / Sammer / Del Piero calibre players during that time, or hired Sacchi in as manager. Would they have dropped off as fast as they did?
It's two completely different scenarios. If we went down their road we would have signed Barkely / Henderson / Vardy / Stones managed by Giggs and hoped for the best.
 
This really is a dull thread and just turned into Klopp / Jose bashing, who is nicer, etc etc.

Who cares.

It should be merged into the 'why do other teams fan hate us' thread as it is full of the type of opinions that answer that question perfectly.
 
It's not that I think he's changed since Dortmund or that he's becoming this or that, but I find him easily dislikeable now.
As was mentioned a few posts up, when he was at Dortmund he could be considered a caf darling, I was one of these who took a liking to him, but that was only seeing him once or so a month in the champions league when passion and tensions seem higher anyway, where when you seen him shouting and screaming, yea great because it was a one off and champs league semi or similar.
Now that he's in our face a lot more and showing that same passion when drawing at West Brom and jumping around breaking glasses it becomes more of a charade than genuine in my view.
 
What does he expect them to do they're a League One/two side.
 
I'm glad the thread title got fixed. I was struggling with the idea of fractions of people as defenders.
 
It's not that I think he's changed since Dortmund or that he's becoming this or that, but I find him easily dislikeable now.
As was mentioned a few posts up, when he was at Dortmund he could be considered a caf darling, I was one of these who took a liking to him, but that was only seeing him once or so a month in the champions league when passion and tensions seem higher anyway, where when you seen him shouting and screaming, yea great because it was a one off and champs league semi or similar.
Now that he's in our face a lot more and showing that same passion when drawing at West Brom and jumping around breaking glasses it becomes more of a charade than genuine in my view.

I found him easily dislikable as soon as he signed for Liverpool.
 
Funnily, I stopped liking Klopp before he became Liverpool manager. There was an interview he did (can't recall when), and his demeanour turned me off. Thought he was over the top and arrogant. Mind, all these football managers have a certain level of arrogance (which you arguably need to have). But somehow, I didn't find it amusing at that time. I may be wrong, but he came across as insincere.

I much rather someone who is in your face a twat, rather than someone who cloaks their 'twatishness' under the 'Mr Nice Guy' vise.
 
Liverpool were never as big as we are now.
During their slump they never went out and bought arguably the best players in France / Germany / Italy. Nor get a Mourinho level manager in.
Imagine they bought Zidane / Sammer / Del Piero calibre players during that time, or hired Sacchi in as manager. Would they have dropped off as fast as they did?
It's two completely different scenarios. If we went down their road we would have signed Barkely / Henderson / Vardy / Stones managed by Giggs and hoped for the best.

Although I get your point, the argument on size of club, is very hard to compare. Liverpool still have shed load of fans abroad, probably 2nd to us, yet their success came at a time when football was far less commercial.

The fact is, by the time the earlier 90's came round they were the biggest team in England and most successful by some distance. It was pretty much unthinkable that they would still be waiting for a league title, 20 years (?) later and winning just one CL.

It's the same for us now, there is nothing to suggest (for me anyway) that we are definitely on course to return to our former glory (fine, we are on a good run, but there are some huge tests to come).

Yes we have one of the best managers, yes we have money, but so does everyone else in the top 6. With Chelsea and Spurs getting new grounds, they will only become bigger.

We have missed out on the CL 3 times in the last 4 years and up until 3 weeks ago it looked a long shot for next season. There is no way we will keep spending the money / attracting the players we have been, IF we continue to fail to qualify, and in reality history only get's you so far.

I hope we do find our way back to the top, but, for me, it's a case of if rather than when - we are 1 of 6 very good teams in the league and I can't see that changing anytime soon - there isn't enough room for everyone...
 
Although I get your point, the argument on size of club, is very hard to compare. Liverpool still have shed load of fans abroad, probably 2nd to us, yet their success came at a time when football was far less commercial.

The fact is, by the time the earlier 90's came round they were the biggest team in England and most successful by some distance. It was pretty much unthinkable that they would still be waiting for a league title, 20 years (?) later and winning just one CL.

It's the same for us now, there is nothing to suggest (for me anyway) that we are definitely on course to return to our former glory (fine, we are on a good run, but there are some huge tests to come).

Yes we have one of the best managers, yes we have money, but so does everyone else in the top 6. With Chelsea and Spurs getting new grounds, they will only become bigger.

We have missed out on the CL 3 times in the last 4 years and up until 3 weeks ago it looked a long shot for next season. There is no way we will keep spending the money / attracting the players we have been, IF we continue to fail to qualify, and in reality history only get's you so far.

I hope we do find our way back to the top, but, for me, it's a case of if rather than when - we are 1 of 6 very good teams in the league and I can't see that changing anytime soon - there isn't enough room for everyone...

The voice of reason, well said sir.
 
Although I get your point, the argument on size of club, is very hard to compare. Liverpool still have shed load of fans abroad, probably 2nd to us, yet their success came at a time when football was far less commercial.

The fact is, by the time the earlier 90's came round they were the biggest team in England and most successful by some distance. It was pretty much unthinkable that they would still be waiting for a league title, 20 years (?) later and winning just one CL.

It's the same for us now, there is nothing to suggest (for me anyway) that we are definitely on course to return to our former glory (fine, we are on a good run, but there are some huge tests to come).

Yes we have one of the best managers, yes we have money, but so does everyone else in the top 6. With Chelsea and Spurs getting new grounds, they will only become bigger.

We have missed out on the CL 3 times in the last 4 years and up until 3 weeks ago it looked a long shot for next season. There is no way we will keep spending the money / attracting the players we have been, IF we continue to fail to qualify, and in reality history only get's you so far.

I hope we do find our way back to the top, but, for me, it's a case of if rather than when - we are 1 of 6 very good teams in the league and I can't see that changing anytime soon - there isn't enough room for everyone...
Clubs are too big and the football world is too small for any big club to fall away. The only scenario that puts a club in danger is if they fall off a financial cliff.
Liverpool is too easy of a comparison imo, the football landscape has grown so much that they don't even resemble each other anymore.
Madrid are the club that I look at.
Pre and slightly post Ronaldo they were signing big star after big star to the point they had so much top talent that they just had to succeed, if only for the individual talent to make up for any weaknesses the side may have.
We've seen the differences our summer signings have made. If we do continue to sign some of the best players in the world then it's only a matter of time before it all clicks if by accident or design.
Money buys success. The top sides in every league are the sides that spend the most money. Just because Liverpool fecked it up for years doesn't mean we have to
 
Clubs are too big and the football world is too small for any big club to fall away. The only scenario that puts a club in danger is if they fall off a financial cliff.
Liverpool is too easy of a comparison imo, the football landscape has grown so much that they don't even resemble each other anymore.
Madrid are the club that I look at.
Pre and slightly post Ronaldo they were signing big star after big star to the point they had so much top talent that they just had to succeed, if only for the individual talent to make up for any weaknesses the side may have.
We've seen the differences our summer signings have made. If we do continue to sign some of the best players in the world then it's only a matter of time before it all clicks if by accident or design.
Money buys success. The top sides in every league are the sides that spend the most money. Just because Liverpool fecked it up for years doesn't mean we have to

Money makes success more likely but it is not a guarantee of it.
 
Well, I for one, always thought Klopp was a massive thunder cnut who's personality, demeanor, arrogance, bitterness and general hippy-ness meant he was a perfect fit for the most cnutish football club in history (Liverpool fyi). He's a detestable fecking prick.
 
Um.. loads and loads of teams - only one team can win a league so that automatically means any other team that spent big who didn't come first failed.
Juve and PSG dominate their respective league. Madrid and Barca speak for themselves.
Of course Im talking about using the money to bring in proven, quality talent. City spending 100 odd million on Stones and Mangala doesn't really count since they're overpaying for average players. Im talking about going out and signing proven world class players from other top sides. That's where elite clubs simply don't fail.
As Perez says, it's a bigger gamble to sign three or four players for 25m than signing an elite player for 80m
 
Erm... We did a pretty good job of it.
I was really talking about the quality of player we signed last summer, being linked with Griezmann and the cost that brings.
The quality players. Of course buying a Skoda for Ferrari money doesn't mean success!
I'll leave it at that, doesn't really fit into the thread
 
Last edited:
In all seriousness here, wasn' this more like....a light hearted joke? I've watched the post match interview (which I guessed none of your did), he praised Plymouth and dropped a few jokes about his team and the opponent also in his post match presser.

The blind hate around here is amazing, you are not even interested in the truth aren't you? :lol:
Good example how someone like Trump could get elected. If something fits your narrative, just go with it, feck the facts!

He's relaxed, he's laughing.

But no, because he's a Liverpool manager, he must be an evil twat! :nono:


This sums it up and shines a new light on it.

It's that shallow ' that lot over the hill ' mentality which is prominent in any kind of rivalry.

Put your pitch forks away lads .
 
Well you're right I'm not interested in the truth, not when it comes to a liverpool manager. Coz many on here wanted Klopp to be man utd manager. He's probably not an evil twat in fairness but he's definitely not as lovable as people make him out to be. In fact I get the feeling that he's probably more arrogant than Mourinho ever was in his hey day.

I don't know if apart from Bayern (i'm guessing) you also support liverpool but at least for me as a hard core man utd fan, klopp is the enemy. I will forever dislike him, criticize and laugh at him every chance I get. The truth is irrelevant.

I rest my case .
 
As someone who followed his whole coaching career quite closely, it is actually quite fascinating reading about "taking on Liverpool´s bitterness", "becoming classless" or "losing the plot". You don´t have to like Klopp, as a personality he is simply too polarizing and extreme in some aspects to be universally well liked. However, if someone wants a good example of how important perceiption is, he just needs to follow the general climate towards Klopp in this forum.

When Klopp was still our coach, he could have been only be described as a Caf darling. Criticism was fairly low and he was lauded for his passion, emotionality, humour and ability to verbally connect with fans. The moment he took on the wrong red, these attributes were turned on it´s head and used against him:

- passion -> sore loser, lack of class
- emotional -> manic, unhinged
- humour -> attempt to butter up the media, insulting to the opposition (the Plymouth example fits perfectly here)
- connection to fans -> creating a cult following around him

Makes you wonder if they took Klopp and replaced him with a clone or host, right? There has actually not happened that much. He only changed his club from a likeable foreign club to a rival.

The job at Liverpool did not change his personality. As of yet, he did not do a single thing which he either did not do at Dortmund or would have looked out of place there. What changed for most on here (there were also people who liked/disliked him at Dortmund and continued to do so, but this is the minority) is just their relationship to him.

Absolutely spot on !

If Klopp went to United and Jose to us it would just be the opposite.

Most football fans seem to forget how to think for themselves. It's a case of run with the pack as they may pick on me if I don't.

Makes me laugh really.

No. Infact. It's societies problem.
 
I never liked Klopp at Dortmund. His tracksuits, dodgy glasses and gurning face annoys me. He is like a chavvy Deidre Barlow.

And why do Liverpool supporters always worship their manager like some kind of cult leader? Have they walked the streets of Merseyside holding his portrait yet?

That was a protest when the Yanks tried to push him out on the sly. There was many protests infact. We won. We protested for justice for 27 years. We won that to . What the rest of the country don't understand is we in Liverpool stick together .

It's much more effective than wearing green and yellow scarfs lad.
 
Juve and PSG dominate their respective league. Madrid and Barca speak for themselves.
Of course Im talking about using the money to bring in proven, quality talent. City spending 100 odd million on Stones and Mangala doesn't really count since they're overpaying for average players. Im talking about going out and signing proven world class players from other top sides. That's where elite clubs simply don't fail.
As Perez says, it's a bigger gamble to sign three or four players for 25m than signing an elite player for 80m

Di Maria, Falcao, Schweinsteiger all fit that model.

That's before going into Kaka, Torres, Shevchenko, Veron, etc.
 
Horrible, seems footballers houses are sometimes viewed as a target knowing there may be goods worth high value inside.

 
Clubs are too big and the football world is too small for any big club to fall away. The only scenario that puts a club in danger is if they fall off a financial cliff.
Liverpool is too easy of a comparison imo, the football landscape has grown so much that they don't even resemble each other anymore.
Madrid are the club that I look at.
Pre and slightly post Ronaldo they were signing big star after big star to the point they had so much top talent that they just had to succeed, if only for the individual talent to make up for any weaknesses the side may have.
We've seen the differences our summer signings have made. If we do continue to sign some of the best players in the world then it's only a matter of time before it all clicks if by accident or design.
Money buys success. The top sides in every league are the sides that spend the most money. Just because Liverpool fecked it up for years doesn't mean we have to

Firstly, no matter what era, the comparison between Utd and Liverpool is an obvious one, both huge institutions with incredible history.

Finances do help, of course they do, but don't guarantee success and as Utd fans I don't think we should be complacent enough to think, 'well just chuck money at it and it will be fine'. We have spent a boat load since Fergie left, and what has that achieved? One FA Cup and missing out of the CL 3 times in 4 years, along with having a squad littered with expensive flops (not including the players the 'World Class' stars Di Maria and Falcao who just about sum up our failed strategy).

You can't compare Madrid's approach, they 'compete' in a league where the TV rights are weighted so much that only 2/3 teams will ever compete for the league. There so much money in the Premier League, you have lower end teams spending £30mil on players, even in the Championship, clubs literally have money to burn - yet it doesn't guarantee titles, survival or promotion.

Regardless of whether Liverpool fecked it up, it's irrelevant, we are fighting against 6 teams now, 6 teams that have bucket loads of cash and will only get more.
 
Drink driving, house burgled - sounds like Christmas wasn't great for Firmino. Probably goes some way to explaining his drop in form.
 
The blind hate around here is amazing, you are not even interested in the truth aren't you?

But no, because he's a Liverpool manager, he must be an evil twat! :nono:
This is all pretty obvious. United forum, Liverpool manager .... let's all wade in and kick the bastard regardless of the truth ! Tribal mentality (TBF as with all forums dedicated to one club).
 
As someone who followed his whole coaching career quite closely, it is actually quite fascinating reading about "taking on Liverpool´s bitterness", "becoming classless" or "losing the plot". You don´t have to like Klopp, as a personality he is simply too polarizing and extreme in some aspects to be universally well liked. However, if someone wants a good example of how important perceiption is, he just needs to follow the general climate towards Klopp in this forum.

When Klopp was still our coach, he could have been only be described as a Caf darling. Criticism was fairly low and he was lauded for his passion, emotionality, humour and ability to verbally connect with fans. The moment he took on the wrong red, these attributes were turned on it´s head and used against him:

- passion -> sore loser, lack of class
- emotional -> manic, unhinged
- humour -> attempt to butter up the media, insulting to the opposition (the Plymouth example fits perfectly here)
- connection to fans -> creating a cult following around him

Makes you wonder if they took Klopp and replaced him with a clone or host, right? There has actually not happened that much. He only changed his club from a likeable foreign club to a rival.

The job at Liverpool did not change his personality. As of yet, he did not do a single thing which he either did not do at Dortmund or would have looked out of place there. What changed for most on here (there were also people who liked/disliked him at Dortmund and continued to do so, but this is the minority) is just their relationship to him.
Absolutely ... Spot On !
 
Spot on. Makes me laugh this place. Klopp is a top manager and had we been offered the chance of him here after Fergie, a lot of fans would have been thrilled.

The biggest joke is the very obvious fact that loads of fans who'll be well behind Jose Mourinho now hated him before he was here, criticising his personality and the way he behaved in going about his job. A good deal of fans didn't want him here at the time Fergie left because of that, suggesting he wasn't united material because he lacked class.

And Fergie was a sore loser, tried to influence refs, lost his rag with players and staff at times and often (in my opinion) lacked class in terms of comments he made regarding opposing managers, referees and the press. And you know what - I still loved him because he was honest, passionate and above all successful.

To take those four points above, there is nothing wrong with being passionate, emotional, engaging with the press and popular with the fans. He's a breath of fresh air to watch on TV and frankly, I find him quite a likeable bloke.

If people want to hate him because they hate Liverpool then that's their prerogative, but at least be honest about it.
And another Bullseye !