How on earth is sacking the manager when he is a point off top and in the UCL quarter finals the right decision?
I think it makes perfectly sense to tie the decision to fire the manager not on the position in the table.
How often is the problem exactly that? You fire a great manager cause he didint win a couple of games, or worse you keep a dead horse in the position just because he got some lucky wins.
Such a decision should be based on a much more diverse approach, unfortunately it is seldom the case in football.