You couldnt write the script. Minutes after 2 posts saying no one in his right mind can call him a luxury player and highlighting his stats in the league we have a guy calling him a luxury player and saying he provides the occasional productivity
Just watched it. Not a great deal to it. Carragher just saying it's about time people should consider him as one of the elite no.10 players. Basically that he's underrated.Anyone got a video of the MNF segment they did on Mata tonight? Would be good to watch.
How do you figure that?Well, he didn't fit in naturally to LVG's plans, as 90% of the people on here kept saying he shouldn't be out right. And now, as he's been pushed out right again, he (along with the rest of the attack) take away any chances of countering, which Jose has built every one of his successful teams to do. So he seems out of place or at least in a place that throws off the manager's philosophy. Oh, and as our best player he's carried us to battles for 4th and produced less than Wayne Rooney.
The point is? What's your actual thinking behind that statement? Is that a slight on Mata? Because it sounds like bollocks.Well, he didn't fit in naturally to LVG's plans, as 90% of the people on here kept saying he shouldn't be out right. And now, as he's been pushed out right again, he (along with the rest of the attack) take away any chances of countering, which Jose has built every one of his successful teams to do. So he seems out of place or at least in a place that throws off the manager's philosophy. Oh, and as our best player he's carried us to battles for 4th and produced less than Wayne Rooney.
The point is? What's your actual thinking behind that statement? Is that a slight on Mata? Because it sounds like bollocks.
It's total bollocks. You could say the same about De Gea being our best player and carrying us to battles for 4th, it'd be equally bollocks.
As a squad we need to build around our best player's and Mata (like De Gea) is firmly and categorically in that group.
The point is? What's your actual thinking behind that statement? Is that a slight on Mata? Because it sounds like bollocks.
Then explain how Manchester United should build around Juan Mata and expect to be anything more than in a battle for 3rd or 4th. Lay it out.
My point is still the same as when I first posted. Sell him for good value and get a proper right winger who can beat players and cross a ball so that our only approach from wide areas is not - get the ball to feet and cut inside.
Modern Football often includes a lop-sided formation where one wide midfielder cuts in to create chances and the other stays wider and beats his man with pace. The latter style is what Martial should be doing much better (like Walcott, Sterling, Mane etc). The former style Mata is performing very well.
This is my point. Those teams each have more balance because Sterling, Walcott, Mane offer width, pace, and quick counters from their sides. Pedro as well. A lot of blame goes to our left side as well, admittedly, but I could flip it and say the left side should have a pacey left footed player if we are going to accommodate Mata on the right. We're forcing a style of play that Barca, Real, and Bayern have been using, only our wide forwards don't belong in the same conversation as theirs.
This is my point. Those teams each have more balance because Sterling, Walcott, Mane offer width, pace, and quick counters from their sides. Pedro as well. A lot of blame goes to our left side as well, admittedly, but I could flip it and say the left side should have a pacey left footed player if we are going to accommodate Mata on the right. We're forcing a style of play that Barca, Real, and Bayern have been using, only our wide forwards don't belong in the same conversation as theirs.
Width comes from the full backs.
You don't need to have Bayern, Real or Barca level forwards to play with an asymmetrical attack. It's really rather common. The notion that we have to play with a "proper" winger on the right is nonsense, especially when your plan for doing so involves selling our best attacker.
Counter attacks don't, however. And ideally, good crosses would come from our fullbacks as well, but they don't. The only players I think back to that have assisted or delivered good balls in from the wide areas are Pogba, Rooney and Herrera.
So, as I keep alluding to, our attacks are slow and predictably through the middle most of the time.
Then please explain to me what other successful teams are playing with inverted wingers on both sides who aren't suited to quick counters
Counter attacks don't, however. And ideally, good crosses would come from our fullbacks as well, but they don't. The only players I think back to that have assisted or delivered good balls in from the wide areas are Pogba, Rooney and Herrera.
So, as I keep alluding to, our attacks are slow and predictably through the middle most of the time.
Then please explain to me what other successful teams are playing with inverted wingers on both sides who aren't suited to quick counters
Counter attacks don't, however. And ideally, good crosses would come from our fullbacks as well, but they don't. The only players I think back to that have assisted or delivered good balls in from the wide areas are Pogba, Rooney and Herrera.
So, as I keep alluding to, our attacks are slow and predictably through the middle most of the time.
Then please explain to me what other successful teams are playing with inverted wingers on both sides who aren't suited to quick counters
I didn't say we had to play a Mata on each wing. Just that if you're going to have an inverted winger on one side then it probably makes sense to go with your best attacker, as opposed to selling your best attacker and hoping for the best.
City often played with Silva as their nominal LW. Hardly peak 90's Giggs. Arsenal have played Ozil in a nominal wing position too. Again, not a "proper" winger. Not sure either of them had an actual winger playing as their supporting full-back either. It's not a problem.
No matter how good a player is, they are - most of the time - still human, and can be affected by confidence. Is it coincidence that he's responding to the faith Jose has shown in him?Does anyone not love this guy?
Is it just me, or does he seem to take on his man a bit more recently? His runs in behind the defense are really something, if a little mis-timed today, but still a great goal.
I agree, get rid of your most productive player and you'll probably start winning again. Logic.
No matter how good a player is, they are - most of the time - still human, and can be affected by confidence. Is it coincidence that he's responding to the faith Jose has shown in him?
I think his 'bad patches' were down to a lack of continuity, lack of momentum, lack of confidence. I hope he stays at OT for ever, and sits in the stand like Bobby does when he's old and greyOf course not, and he had to prove himself to Jose as well, but he has mostly been good for us, except for some bad patches. He may not be one to carry a team, but damn he is good in a functional one.
I think his 'bad patches' were down to a lack of continuity, lack of momentum, lack of confidence. I hope he stays at OT for ever, and sits in the stand like Bobby does when he's old and grey
He could play for a long time - not very dependent on pace; if he was, he would be rubbish. He's been really, really good this season though.