Well played sir.
Hell end up just like Gervinho, Lamela and Giaccherini. All looked something in Italy and failed to get anywhere near that level in the PL.
Well, Cuadrado is better than Willian who will still play a part in a otherwise very thin Chelsea attack. One or both of Schurrle and Salah will leave.
Same. And we all know Van Gaal would only use him as a wingback, which means 352 would be here to stay.I must be in the minority but I don't rate him that highly. He can do some brilliant things but he can also look absolutely terrible (aka Nani). I wouldn't be overly bothered if Chelsea get him, he's no better than Willian IMO and wouldn't really improve them.
Haven't seen much of him outside of the last World Cup but it'd be worrying for Chelsea if he was no better than Willian as so many in here say. He's such an average player, just a work horse with good pace.
So should we through a cheeky bid for schurlle?
I think he's a tidy player
We could do, then play him out of position for a laugh.So should we through a cheeky bid for schurlle?
I think he's a tidy player
So should we through a cheeky bid for schurlle?
I think he's a tidy player
Why is that?Harsh on Willian. If he played for us, I think he'd look much better than he does for Chelsea and he'd be talked about as one of the better wingers in this league.
We're obsessed with Chelsea's transfers and players.
Harsh on Willian. If he played for us, I think he'd look much better than he does for Chelsea and he'd be talked about as one of the better wingers in this league.
I agree. I think Willian is a very good player. As you said, playing for any other team regularly and he'd look the business. Got that bit of flair about him but is also a very tidy player on his day and gets his passes right, showing his intelligence. Wasn't sure about him based on what I saw at Shakhtar, but he's shown his ability for Chelsea.
Thought Brazil would use him more at the WC as he'd bring that calmness to their attack, which would have been ideal in amongst the likes of Hulk etc.
This. Let's take him off their hands.
We could do, then play him out of position for a laugh.
Doesn't work hard enough, he's a goal threat no doubt but not up to mourinho's standards, hence why they are going in for Cuadrado. I'd take Cuadrado over Schurrle tbh
I think Cuadrado could be better for them than Willian and Schurrle. Schurrle really is a weird one because his numbers are good and he is very efficient yet he hardly ever plays well when I watch him.So Mourinho doesn't like Willian and Schürrle anymore. It's not a signing that will really strengthen them as they will have to sell players to buy.
Willian has a better work rate defensively. That's why he plays ahead of Schurrle. Nothing weird really. Chelsea are too vulnerable going out with Fabregas, Hazard, Oscar, Costa and another attacking winger (Schurrle). Put any other player on Matic's place and that midfield would get overrun by most teams in the PL. Moreover, Ivanovic's average position is way too high up the pitch (something I've always wondered how and why Mourinho tolerates) and they need Willian fill the holes on that wing.I think Cuadrado could be better for them than Willian and Schurrle. Schurrle really is a weird one because his numbers are good and he is very efficient yet he hardly ever plays well when I watch him.
It's admirable how ruthless Chelsea are when it comes to transfers, this one will be done in no time.
In my opinion, we're spending too much money on a rotation option who is already 27 years old because I can't see him starting a head of Willian.