balaks
Full Member
The salt.
Bid for Willian incoming
Spurs have had luck too.
They're just shit.
Yeah we have been very lucky this year with losing all our main attacking players for a large chunk of the season. With luck like that I think I'd prefer to be unlucky.
He's talking about being lucky with VAR decisions so I don't know why you're going on about injuries.
But now that you've brought it up we had Pogba missing for 80% of the season and Martial and Rashford both missed a couple of months each.
We are lucky that Mourinho put down so great foundations. He bought Matic,Bailly, Lindelöf and Pogba. Laid the foundations for getting Maguire by wanting him.
Called Shaw out for being fat and turned him into a world beater. Developed Martial and Rashford by pushing them against each other on the wings.
Made Lingard perform like a world beater that we still see the fruit off. Brought in Mctominay and bought Fred too.
Also paved the way for Greenwood and Williams getting the chance by putting his faith in the youth.
Clearly Ole has lucked his way into a world class squad only needing minor tweaks?
Oh you mean the VAR that has cost us at least 2 goals since the restart? Yeah really lucky.
Using the XG, XGA and XP are a really useful way of looking how well a team is evolving. I predicted us to finish above Arsenal and Spurs solely based on last season's metrics which had us at 10 points better off than them.I'm a fan of xG and I quote it occassionally myself. It is useful in proving certain points but it is dangerous to jump to conclusion solely based on these stats without considering the context, just like you said. I don't think it's applicable in this case though. Mourinho's sides always look inferior in this aspect, but this doesn't necessarily mean he is a poor manager. We won the Europa with an xG of 1.1 (against Ajax's 1.7) but anyone who saw the match knew we were the better team and we were going to win the game. Mourinho's biggest strength is his defefensive tactic, which is never fairly reflected in these stats.
It was sarcasm, but most of it is true. He did buy the players I mentioned and wanted Maguire too.
Rashford and Martial did develop on the wing, but not as fast and much as we would have hoped for.
Lingard played well for him too.
Faith in youth was minimal though, but he did bring in Mctominay.
Now who is salty?
What about your opening goal against West Ham which should have been disallowed for handball?
Was that not a bit of luck?
Using the XG, XGA and XP are a really useful way of looking how well a team is evolving. I predicted us to finish above Arsenal and Spurs solely based on last season's metrics which had us at 10 points better off than them.
That's partly why I'm sure Spurs and Arsenal are stuck where they are for the foreseeable, they're not only down there but are even overperforming their metrics which suggests they are susceptible to dropping even lower.
Alli's goal against Villa which he clearly handled.Now who is salty?
What about your opening goal against West Ham which should have been disallowed for handball?
Was that not a bit of luck?
Look with VAR I generally think it evens itself out in the end for most teams. I'm just enjoying Jose's shit.
The virusesHe probably thinks Pogba and Martial being out injured was us getting the rub of the green.
Need him to turn into prime Jose and smash Leicester.
Grinding out/shithousing wins is good in isolated circumstances but if it keeps happening over a period of time it's a matter of when not if results catch up with you.Being efficient is still a skill though. Being able to grind out wins another one. Arsenal and Spurs dropped like crazy last season, but so did we near the end.
Dominate and not giving away chances even when you can afford it is still the best football. Although it is not certain to win you things.
City play more like that and goes for big wins.
It was sarcasm, but most of it is true. He did buy the players I mentioned and wanted Maguire too.
Rashford and Martial did develop on the wing, but not as fast and much as we would have hoped for.
Lingard played well for him too.
Faith in youth was minimal though, but he did bring in Mctominay.
The salt.
Salty for what? That a outdated git is managing might Spurs?
Grinding out/shithousing wins is good in isolated circumstances but if it keeps happening over a period of time it's a matter of when not if results catch up with you.
I'm not basing what I'm saying on teams playing defensive football, I'm basing it more on when they play shit for ages (around half a season) but still win in the short term, it's a myth that that's a good sign in terms of the bigger picture.
We are lucky that Mourinho put down so great foundations. He bought Matic,Bailly, Lindelöf and Pogba. Laid the foundations for getting Maguire by wanting him.
Called Shaw out for being fat and turned him into a world beater. Developed Martial and Rashford by pushing them against each other on the wings.
Made Lingard perform like a world beater that we still see the fruit off. Brought in Mctominay and bought Fred too.
Also paved the way for Greenwood and Williams getting the chance by putting his faith in the youth.
Clearly Ole has lucked his way into a world class squad only needing minor tweaks?
Defending for your lives near the end all the time is not a good sign. Although if you get a goal ahead and still controll the game without creating much yourself it can still show dominance.
Wolves is a side that master that art fairly well, but Burnley got one against them late anyway recently .
My point is you don't need to smash it in terms of goals or xG to deserve the wins. Being efficient in attack and defending well could work out well.
Also if you chase a game and waste medium chances it doesn't mean you deserve the win particular not for a big side. It can be part of the other sides plan to allow certain chances.
Most? I'd say all of that is trashMost of this is nonsense. Buying those players is pointless when you get nothing out of them. He had Pogba desperate to leave, same with Martial. He didn’t even want Fred and when he got him he looked like a non-league player. He couldn’t get Rashford and Martial playing together and kept rotating them, hardly a masterclass in development when everyone ended up miserable as a result of his management. Ole got a tune out of Shaw, and it was because of Ole bringing in Williams for competition that sorted him out, Mourinho nearly ruined him too. Another year of Jose would have left us a mid-table side.
Here I supplement with another set of data - points and expected points. As you can see, in the more successful seasons Mourinho had (14/15, 17/18, and arguably this season), his team always got significantly more points than expected. When his tactic didn't work and he got a similar point as expected, it was already bad enough to get him sacked (18/19). His negative playstyle is just simply unfavorable for him in these stats. Refer to the "Tiki Taka vs Counter Attack" section to this thread if you are interested.That's not really true.
Season Club Goals Scored Goals Against xG xGA xG difference xGA difference 2014-15 Chelsea 73 32 68.64 31.52 -4.36 -0.48 2015-16 (till Leicester game - 16 games) Chelsea 18 26 19.5 18.37 +1.5 -7.63 2016-17 Man Utd 54 29 57.57 31.62 2.57 2.62 2017-18 Man Utd 68 28 59.04 43.54 -8.96 15.54 2018-19 (Till Pool game - 17 games) Man Utd 29 29 28.22 26.53 -0.78 -2.47 2019-20 (From WHU game - 24 games) Spurs 39 29 34.03 34.92 -4.97 +5.92
All in all, that one season apart and this season to a certain degree, he has remained round about at the xG level only (averaging 2.5 more goals scored per season and conceding 2.25 goals less per season than expected numbers)
And if we remove that 17-18 season, his teams have scored 1.2 more goals a season and conceded 0.4 goals more than expected.
Season (League position) | PTS | xPTS | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
14/15 (1) | 87 | 75.32 | -11.68 |
15/16 after 16 games (16) | 15 | 22.88 | +7.88 |
16/17 (6) | 69 | 70.89 | +1.89 |
17/18 (2) | 81 | 62.33 | -18.67 |
18/19 after 17 games (6) | 26 | 23.92 | -2.08 |
19/20 recent 24 games (4) | 41 | 32.37 | -8.63 |
1-0 wins are rarely ever comfortable, and more often than not, you are likely to lose control over the game. Wolves haven't mastered that art of 1-0. Its just that they score a majority of their goals in the latter part of the game and hence they're able to hang on (11 of their 49 goals were scored in last 15 mins, 24 of their 49 in last half hour) for the win.
Coming to your next point, is there any side in the world that is 'efficient' relative to their xG ? Teams have outperformed their xG over a season or 2 at max, but it more often than not comes back to actual numbers.
And there is no side in the world that would allow the opposition to have medium difficulty chances as part of their game plan ffs! At max, they'd have a deep defensive line and force the attackers to shoot from outside the box, but those chances can't be termed medium difficulty chances!
Yeah he will potentially sabotage Spurs getting into Europa League next season because he hates Utd. You really do think the world revolves around you don't you.Wouldn't put it past him to purposely sabotage his teams tactics against Leicester just to try and make united miss out on champions league football out of spite.