Sigma
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,428
Why does he need to prove it ?
I'm not saying he needs to.
Why does he need to prove it ?
Didn't you write this "I'm saying he needs to prove that he is better than Mourinhio" ?I'm not saying he needs to.
Didn't you write this "I'm saying he needs to prove that he is better than Mourinhio" ?
I commented during the game that they remind me of Moyes' United. Awful football and a team completely devoid of any confidence. Even if the slightest thing goes wrong they pack it in.
Hidink, Rafa,Grant and Di Matteo all done a good job.It's either going to be Klopp or one of Roman's fun caretaker picks.
why did they buy Papy Djilobodji?
Jose to pool,Rodgers to ChelseaThis is crazy, Chelsea lucky not to lose a 4th!
I wouldn't sack Jose, I think he is a fantastic manager but cat see the Russian owner happy with this, especially when Klopp is clubless.
Where would Jose go, Liverpool?
Funny though all this is, Mourinho has a point when he suggests sacking him would be stupid. They're in a bad spot right now but he is still a) one of the best managers on the planet and b) their greatest ever manager. If ever someone deserves some patience you'd think it would be him...
Jose to pool,Rodgers to Chelsea
why did they buy Papy Djilobodji?
I think we'll be in for him also.John Stones value goes up every time Chelsea play.
I'm saying he needs to prove that he is better than Mourinhio, not that he is one of the best managers in the world (which I agree with you, he is).
This Premier League that is being shown up by clubs from Eastern Europe on a weekly basis, get real man this league has lost it's lustre. Even if Pep never comes into this league but continues to rack up the titles in Germany or Spain he will still be up there with the best. Over the past three years the PL hasn't been the yardstick of excellence.I'm not sure about that, Pep has managed Barca and Bayern, 2 teams which you are pretty much expected to win every single league due to their domination over the rest of the league, He hasn't come to the premier league yet and until he does we won't know how to compare. Yes they have both managed at the same time in La Liga, but let's not forget the Barca team was out of this world and Real are fecked up by Perez.
This Premier League that is being shown up by clubs from Eastern Europe on a weekly basis, get real man this league has lost it's lustre. Even if Pep never comes into this league but continues to rack up the titles in Germany or Spain he will still be up there with the best. Over the past three years the PL hasn't been the yardstick of excellence.
Mourinho, to me, has failed to grow tactically and his teams have always involved utilizing the brilliance of one gifted attacker and shutting up shop looking to hurt teams on the counter. He has never been brave enough to take himself out of that M.O that's served him so well. In comparison to Pep and the level Pep get's his teams reaching, the tactical innovations and being successful whilst doing this, Pep more than edges it for me.
Surely the mark of the greatest managers si their ability to get things going when times are tough, not when everything is rosy.
For all the talk of 'what happened this season', they've been getting worse since February last season. This isnt an 8 game slump, its about 20 games long so far. They won the league because of how they started out last year, and the rest of us were too shite to catch up when given the chance, a truly great manager would have it sorted by now.
LVG did.
Ferguson never had meltdowns like this, he was always in total control of himself and all his players.What about the barren spell SAF had before the emergence of Ronaldo/Rooney? We looked in serious decline back then, it was far worse than the few months bad form Chelsea are going through (in which they did actually win the league).
Adversity is where the great managers shine but, as SAF proved, even the great managers need time. We went a few years without a league title and still stuck by our manager. It's only just October, the notion of sacking Mourinho now is ludicrous.
Well Wenger has had eleven years and gone through one ten year plan too many. Fergie's barren spell did not involve being this clueless, it wasn't with an expensively assembled side and it was just us not being good enough to win the league - we were never this shit. Wenger, LvG and Mourinho (now) would take that barren spell if offered today.What about the barren spell SAF had before the emergence of Ronaldo/Rooney? We looked in serious decline back then, it was far worse than the few months bad form Chelsea are going through (in which they did actually win the league).
Adversity is where the great managers shine but, as SAF proved, even the great managers need time. We went a few years without a league title and still stuck by our manager. It's only just October, the notion of sacking Mourinho now is ludicrous.
Ferguson never had meltdowns like this, he was always in total control of himself and all his players.
He got more time because he was twice the manager Mourhino is
Well Wenger has had eleven years and gone through one ten year plan too many. Fergie's barren spell did not involve being this clueless, it wasn't with an expensively assembled side and it was just us not being good enough to win the league - we were never this shit. Wenger, LvG and Mourinho (now) would take that barren spell if offered today.
A couple of third place finish and league runners up plus an FA Cup is not something to be scoffed at. That is what Fergie's barren spell was. As for Jose, yes they won the league in May but their poor start shows no sign of turning around and instead of keeping his shit together he is the one lashing out blaming everything from the medic to his players. They have already lost so much ground and further losses will just compound the situation yet there are still to face dangerous sides like West Ham and Spurs even discounting Liverpool and ourselves. How much more whining and sniping can their players take before the situation escalates to open civil war like it was in his last season at Real?Ah come on, lets not overreact to Chelsea's current situation. They just won the league last May and (bad though they currently are) I think Mourinho is right to say they can easily finish inside the top four again this season if they pull their shit together. I seriously doubt any top manager would think that's a worse situation to be in than going several years without a title.
I'm certainly sure LVG wouldn't take that barren spell if offered to him as it would mean his time here was a total failure.
8 points from 8 games warrants the sack for any top 4 manager.
Paying the price for a shocking transfer window. Don't care how good you were the previous season, you can't get away with not even buying one player that would instantly improve your starting eleven. Same mistake Moyes made. Another matter altogether whether the manager was to blame or the club failed to sign the players he wanted.
Ferguson never had meltdowns like this, he was always in total control of himself and all his players.
He got more time because he was twice the manager Mourhino is
Ah come on, lets not overreact to Chelsea's current situation. They just won the league last May and (bad though they currently are) I think Mourinho is right to say they can easily finish inside the top four again this season if they pull their shit together. I seriously doubt any top manager would think that's a worse situation to be in than going several years without a title.
I'm certainly sure LVG wouldn't take that barren spell if offered to him as it would mean his time here was a total failure.
How much will it cost Abramovich to sack him? Didn't he recently sign a new long contract?
why did they buy Papy Djilobodji?
that explains why they have zillion players out on loan.Cause they are trading players. Buy low, loan out, sell higher. They don´t necessarily buy players to actually play them at Chelsea.