One whose last best youth product was rafinha and the other who has almost a first deal on every good German player. People have got to realise that we have been in a such unique situation in the modern game where a manager carried us for quarter of a century and everyone is expecting the next one to be the same. Its a hard job for any manager and people expecting a next manager to change in the philosophy immediately are seriously misguided.
For all their talents and the supposed best manager in the league, City won feck all last year. and so have Liverpool this year still. Liverpool would have had a good season only if they go on to win the CL. Yes they could win it and fair fecks to them if they do it. If they had done similar to us what our fans demand,i.e., sack the manager every year he doesnt win anything, they would have sacked them to. They are in a position because they persisted with their manager and believing in them, irrespective of the output.
Hypothetical question, would you take Klopp over Jose if it meant we don't win anything but just play"eye catching" football every season?.
What is it we should strive to be?. I have seen this "United tradition" thrown around a lot in this thread. With much respect, I say, what the feck does that mean?. Playing attacking football?, winning trophies?, We have had two managers in our entire history who could do that and we are still hungover from the last one and there in lies our biggest problem.
No one expects any club to crank out worldie youth products every other year though, you disingenuously saying Rafinha is Barcelona's last best youth product doesn't take from the fact that they have a much better track record than ours regarding in-house development in the modern era. Plus, Barcelona and Bayern do still manage to remain competitive despite managerial changes, and you'll hardly ever hear "
he needs his own full team before we can judge" type of ridiculous arguments from their fanbases that you often see in this thread to excuse/defend Mourinho. There's also a consistency in terms of approach to play and recruitment, and those are some of the points i was making to your
"What's the solution? Lets chuck millions on a manager every year and if he doesnt get it right, we will try another one?" question (you can't just cherry pick sentences to reply to while ignoring how they were contextualized). Being overtly reliant on a/the manager is not the most efficient way to go about things these days, not for long-term and continuous success imo. I feel our structure has to change so as to allow us to be able to course correct asap all the while mitigating the negative effects of a potential managerial change.
People always refer to City winning nothing last season, and us winning the carabao cup and europa as if its some sort of ginormous triumph, personally, I find it comical considering the improvement they have made and where they are now. Also, though understandably, maybe justifiably even, I feel expectations for us have changed so quickly and to me that's somewhat sad. I'd trade you City's past two seasons for ours in a heartbeat. Like I said, it’s not like we are out here ugly winning and lifting important trophies. We are a b tier cup competition team, that looks eons away from being able to compete for the most coveted trophies. Klopp and Mourinho have been at their current clubs for a similar amount of time, Mourinho with considerably more resources and arguably a better set of players, on paper at least, has, imo, shown less improvement in terms of coherent and purposeful play as a team. Furthermore, while several players at Liverpool have improved under Klopp, ours have regressed under Mourinho. Despite him not lifting trophies, Liverpool didn't just keep Klopp around in a vacuum or out of the goodness of their heart, the progress has been substantial even under non optimal circumstances like losing arguably their best player.
I find that hypothetical question weird because its posits Klopp not winning anything as an eternal recurring event. But yes, I'd rather us be playing current Liverpool football than current Manchester football, and in the same vein, I'd rather we were in the CL final instead of in the FA cup final, even if it meant us switching places with them on the table. The gap between us isn't exactly grand canyon like on the table, and that's mostly due to them having an inconsistent start to the season. Based on current evidence, I feel if Klopp had the resources available to Mourinho at United, he'd be doing a better job than Mourinho is.
I never once mentioned
"United tradition" or anything of the like, you're projecting other people's arguments onto me and I'd ask you to remain objective if possible, please. I think United should strive to be a club that competes at and for the highest/most coveted trophies while playing a brand of attacking football. Those are my personal beliefs, and I'd hazard a guess that is/was part of our appeal and one of the core elements that formed the platform for both our sporting and commercial success.