I understand that but isn't the manager supposed to implement his philosophy and aren't top managers considered elite because they have the ability to implement it with great efficiency? No manager has a perfect group of player, they all have two things to do, teach their philosophy and tweak it in order to make some players fit in it.
For me what you are describing is a bad manager.
For me what I am describing is an extremely stubborn, arrogant manager. Whether he is good or bad depends on results, not his willingness to take blame.
Right now, judged on results, he is a good manager. Not great, not elite - not in the here and now. He is only elite if you look back on his entire career. That is certainly great. But as time goes on he looks more and more like he is past his peak. He didnt used to lose games like that last night. He away record against the top teams used to be better too.
I am loathe to write him off entirely. But neither do I expect him to change. I posted a comment earlier, after reading an article about last night by Barney Ronay, inspired by something he said. It was along the lines of, Mourinho's defensive style used to be about pragmatism, but it has become a dogma. He is so closely associated with playing that way that he cannot bring himself to abandon it, to evolve with the times. Also, Ronay suggested (and this I cannot comment on really as I have no way to verify or refute it) it is his intense dislike of Barca that drives him, he is adamant he will win playing the antithesis of the Barca Way. Hence, he will never change.
As I said, I cant comment on the extent to which he is motivated by his hatred of Barca. But I do believe his defensive style is a dogma.
A comment I have made a number of times over the last couple of years: a lot of brilliant managers come and go. Some of them burn even brighter than SAF for a short period of time. Mourinho was one of them. For a period his achievements surpassed even SAF's and it looked like if he kept it up he would win more trophies than he did. What is much rarer is a manager that can operate at the kind of level SAF did for as long as he did. SAF's real genius, what really sets him apart, is not the fact he delivered a Treble to United, or won 3 back to back PLs, or whatever. It is that he operated at that very high level, a level only a few managers have been able to reach, but stayed there for 20+ years. What is hard about it is that it requires not just a mastery of a particular football philosophy, but an ability to adapt as quickly as the game evolves. The game changed a lot between the late 80s when SAF took over and the 10s when he quit, but he kept up with it.
My concern with Mourinho was always that we were betting on him having that same quality. He had been at the top for a long time, starting at Porto, through his achievements in England, Italy and Spain. The idea he would still be at the top, the best manager around, after all the time, assumed he had longevity akin to SAF's. And there just arent that many examples of managers who have been at the very top for such a long time. Many become wedded to a certain way of doing things that deliver them success at a particular point in time, but they do not necessarily have the separate quality of being able to adapt.
I dont think Mourinho can adapt.
The more I type the more I realise I am talking myself into thinking we are better off without him. But as I said in another post, I am more concerned about what comes after. I dont think we will win the PL or CL under Mourinho. But I think he will keep us in the top 4 and stable. I think we need to be thinking very carefully about what comes next at this point. We shouldnt rush into anything, but Woodward should be working on this. I would give Mourinho next season but with a view to it being his last, unless next season pans out very differently (much better) than I expect.