#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,651
If this is true then its only good thing he did yesterday
Last edited:
Under Fergie we were frequently dumped out of Europe by small clubs such as Leverkusen, Lille, Galatasary even though we had a team full of superstars.
We're 2nd in the league above some excellent teams like Liverpool, tottenham, Chelsea.
Mourinho will silence doubters next season and he clearly needs a few more of the hard working types of players that thrive in his systems vefore he can build a ptoper Jose team.
For me what I am describing is an extremely stubborn, arrogant manager. Whether he is good or bad depends on results, not his willingness to take blame.
Right now, judged on results, he is a good manager. Not great, not elite - not in the here and now. He is only elite if you look back on his entire career. That is certainly great. But as time goes on he looks more and more like he is past his peak. He didnt used to lose games like that last night. He away record against the top teams used to be better too.
I am loathe to write him off entirely. But neither do I expect him to change. I posted a comment earlier, after reading an article about last night by Barney Ronay, inspired by something he said. It was along the lines of, Mourinho's defensive style used to be about pragmatism, but it has become a dogma. He is so closely associated with playing that way that he cannot bring himself to abandon it, to evolve with the times. Also, Ronay suggested (and this I cannot comment on really as I have no way to verify or refute it) it is his intense dislike of Barca that drives him, he is adamant he will win playing the antithesis of the Barca Way. Hence, he will never change.
As I said, I cant comment on the extent to which he is motivated by his hatred of Barca. But I do believe his defensive style is a dogma.
A comment I have made a number of times over the last couple of years: a lot of brilliant managers come and go. Some of them burn even brighter than SAF for a short period of time. Mourinho was one of them. For a period his achievements surpassed even SAF's and it looked like if he kept it up he would win more trophies than he did. What is much rarer is a manager that can operate at the kind of level SAF did for as long as he did. SAF's real genius, what really sets him apart, is not the fact he delivered a Treble to United, or won 3 back to back PLs, or whatever. It is that he operated at that very high level, a level only a few managers have been able to reach, but stayed there for 20+ years. What is hard about it is that it requires not just a mastery of a particular football philosophy, but an ability to adapt as quickly as the game evolves. The game changed a lot between the late 80s when SAF took over and the 10s when he quit, but he kept up with it.
My concern with Mourinho was always that we were betting on him having that same quality. He had been at the top for a long time, starting at Porto, through his achievements in England, Italy and Spain. The idea he would still be at the top, the best manager around, after all the time, assumed he had longevity akin to SAF's. And there just arent that many examples of managers who have been at the very top for such a long time. Many become wedded to a certain way of doing things that deliver them success at a particular point in time, but they do not necessarily have the separate quality of being able to adapt.
I dont think Mourinho can adapt.
The more I type the more I realise I am talking myself into thinking we are better off without him. But as I said in another post, I am more concerned about what comes after. I dont think we will win the PL or CL under Mourinho. But I think he will keep us in the top 4 and stable. I think we need to be thinking very carefully about what comes next at this point. We shouldnt rush into anything, but Woodward should be working on this. I would give Mourinho next season but with a view to it being his last, unless next season pans out very differently (much better) than I expect.
disclaimer is that Van Gaal had Rooney as his only striker. This team would be on similar with Wayne breaking up every attack
Through everything in the past two seasons my belief in Mourinho and the team has been relentless. Not one time did I doubt him - he always found a way. I know he’s taking the team in a better direction than any other potential manager out there (except Guardiola). However, last nights game for the first time ever really shook me. He was arrogant beyond belief. He was riding the high of outclassing chelsea and Liverpool and forgot to humble himself for last nights game. He took a very calculated approach to the Sevilla game based on pure arrogance.
Now this has not swayed me away from him because with all Mourinhos success you must accept this side of him. I just didn’t expect him to not stay humble. Disappointed.
If this is true then its only good thing he did yesterday
LVG had Falcao, RvP, Rooney in his squad.
LVG had Falcao, RvP, Rooney in his squad.
The more I type the more I realise I am talking myself into thinking we are better off without him. But as I said in another post, I am more concerned about what comes after. I dont think we will win the PL or CL under Mourinho. But I think he will keep us in the top 4 and stable. I think we need to be thinking very carefully about what comes next at this point. We shouldnt rush into anything, but Woodward should be working on this. I would give Mourinho next season but with a view to it being his last, unless next season pans out very differently (much better) than I expect.
You really need your drop this agenda you have against Pogba and Martial, nobody is buying it. They didn't even start yesterday and they are no less intelligent than Sanchez who although talented makes a ridiculous amount of rookie decision for a veteran or Fellaini who he loves like a son. It's such a lazy classification
If this is true then its only good thing he did yesterday
Can't say I've ever understood this logic. Are football players really so fragile that they can't handle public criticism? If they play like shit they deserve to be called out on it.This is the reason he said that he had knocked us out twice. It was nothing new for utd etc.
I think this will bring players closer to the manager as he prevents them going under the hammer.
If this is true then its only good thing he did yesterday
Can't say I've ever understood this logic. Are football players really so fragile that they can't handle public criticism? If they play like shit they deserve to be called out on it.
Under Fergie we were frequently dumped out of Europe by small clubs such as Leverkusen, Lille, Galatasary even though we had a team full of superstars.
The truth is that we put in many performances that were deemed cowardly in Europe under Fergie. Pundits from all angles saying he was a dinosaur and finished and then a year later when a young player matured into a first teamer and we signed a big name then he shuts everyone up.Why you bringing Fergie into this? Lille was a group stage game.
That Leverkusen team knocked out Liverpool and Madrid only beat them by one goal. They nearly did the treble. Also we should have beaten them. We missed chances.
Under Fergie we had a few dodgy results, but it was more down to luck than playing like cowards. Even against Porto, Scholes had a perfectly good goal disallowed and then they score in last min.
No sane person is going to tell me Fergie would have approached the game like Jose did yesterday. The teamtalk probably would have been it’s Sevilla lads.
Jose isn’t getting battered because of the result, he is getting battered due to the cowardly tactics and approach in both games.
Things will work out fine, it's clear as day to see that the midfield is in need of major recruitment. The truth is the team is not good enough, and to be second, is an improvement, the performance will only improve when the midfield get's sorted and unfortunately, the team does not have a footballing brain, someone to control and dictate the play, jose was hoping pogba could do the job, but that has not worked out, and the the centre back pairing is also an issue as only bailly, and linderof[who will come good] are capable with the ball at their feet.
When i watch pogba i think he see's himself as a zidane, although he has talent and skill in abundance, what he lacks is the ability to move the ball up the field quickly and more often than not just hogs the ball.
The difference between him and others with his skillset is he likes to create for himself more than for others, and to compound the problem, in the premier league you do not get as much time on the ball, as you would in Italy, xabi alonso, was able to make that transition, of learning how to create the time and space to play the game to their speed, even kdb and silva, have managed it.
People have been complaining about jose playing martial, rashford in the same team,i believe if they can adjust their game slightly both would be able to feature in the future, interchanging during the game, the purchase of sanchez, is to help them make that transition, without the added pressure, as for playing luke shaw at left back and pobga in front now, that would be suicidal.
If the team did not draw the three games over the christmas / new year period, the gap between second and third would be alot bigger.
The team needs a player like mateo kovacic at real madrid, a player who gets the ball, and moves it up the field quickly, and who can also join in with attacks and a dacoure at watford, with mctomminay as the understudy, and within a year or two when matic is phased out, the midfield trio would become a major force.....
For me what I am describing is an extremely stubborn, arrogant manager. Whether he is good or bad depends on results, not his willingness to take blame.
Right now, judged on results, he is a good manager. Not great, not elite - not in the here and now. He is only elite if you look back on his entire career. That is certainly great. But as time goes on he looks more and more like he is past his peak. He didnt used to lose games like that last night. He away record against the top teams used to be better too.
I am loathe to write him off entirely. But neither do I expect him to change. I posted a comment earlier, after reading an article about last night by Barney Ronay, inspired by something he said. It was along the lines of, Mourinho's defensive style used to be about pragmatism, but it has become a dogma. He is so closely associated with playing that way that he cannot bring himself to abandon it, to evolve with the times. Also, Ronay suggested (and this I cannot comment on really as I have no way to verify or refute it) it is his intense dislike of Barca that drives him, he is adamant he will win playing the antithesis of the Barca Way. Hence, he will never change.
As I said, I cant comment on the extent to which he is motivated by his hatred of Barca. But I do believe his defensive style is a dogma.
A comment I have made a number of times over the last couple of years: a lot of brilliant managers come and go. Some of them burn even brighter than SAF for a short period of time. Mourinho was one of them. For a period his achievements surpassed even SAF's and it looked like if he kept it up he would win more trophies than he did. What is much rarer is a manager that can operate at the kind of level SAF did for as long as he did. SAF's real genius, what really sets him apart, is not the fact he delivered a Treble to United, or won 3 back to back PLs, or whatever. It is that he operated at that very high level, a level only a few managers have been able to reach, but stayed there for 20+ years. What is hard about it is that it requires not just a mastery of a particular football philosophy, but an ability to adapt as quickly as the game evolves. The game changed a lot between the late 80s when SAF took over and the 10s when he quit, but he kept up with it.
My concern with Mourinho was always that we were betting on him having that same quality. He had been at the top for a long time, starting at Porto, through his achievements in England, Italy and Spain. The idea he would still be at the top, the best manager around, after all the time, assumed he had longevity akin to SAF's. And there just arent that many examples of managers who have been at the very top for such a long time. Many become wedded to a certain way of doing things that deliver them success at a particular point in time, but they do not necessarily have the separate quality of being able to adapt.
I dont think Mourinho can adapt.
The more I type the more I realise I am talking myself into thinking we are better off without him. But as I said in another post, I am more concerned about what comes after. I dont think we will win the PL or CL under Mourinho. But I think he will keep us in the top 4 and stable. I think we need to be thinking very carefully about what comes next at this point. We shouldnt rush into anything, but Woodward should be working on this. I would give Mourinho next season but with a view to it being his last, unless next season pans out very differently (much better) than I expect.
Of course he is better than Van Gaal but that is no standard to be compared against.Van Gaal 15/16:
Scored 0 goals in a game: 12
Scored 4 goals in a game: 1
Scored 5 goals in a game: 1
Jose 17/18:
Scored 0 goals in a game: 7
Scored 4 goals in a game: 9
Scored 5 goals in a game: 0
*Stats from all comps
We've not finished this season yet. Van Gaal finished the 15/16 season on 49 goals in the PL, we've scored 58 this season so far with 8 games left. Van Gaal football that season was terrible, terrible football.
I think it plays on the mind when players next step up on the pitch. Imagine if all the Criticism goes to the player, he will not play instinctively and second guess every decision he makes on the pitch, which will worsen his form and a vicious circle of the same will ensue. I also think he did this, cause he knows deep down that fault was his as he did select a bad starting 11.Can't say I've ever understood this logic. Are football players really so fragile that they can't handle public criticism? If they play like shit they deserve to be called out on it.
If this is true then its only good thing he did yesterday
He came out in the press conference and took no responsibility whatsoever
Monaco, Dortmund, Porto, Leverkusen, Galatasary, Milan were all teams who at the time we were expected to cruise to victory over in CL play offs. Clubs that would have been about Seville level when we faced them.Lille never knocked us out.
Galatasaray knocked us out in what was our first appearance in the competition for 24 years, at a time when English football was at its lowest ebb, all the other leagues including the Turkish were able to compete, and we were hamstrung by the three foreigners rule.
Yes we certainly had disappointing exits under Fergie especially in the early 2000s, however nothing comparable to last night and in any case, Fergie was a serial league winner for us the whole way through, dominating the PL and generally playing great football.
Was there supposed to be a drum roll or are we to fill in the blank?! OK, I'll have a go - we're 2nd and that plus an FA Cup win would still look like an improvement of sorts?Anyone expecting Mourinho to change or adapt is living on another planet.
The only thing stopping me from calling for his head is
Yeah, does anybody still believe that?I guess the point is he said deliberately controversial stuff to steal the headlines and take the focus off the players.
Monaco, Dortmund, Porto, Leverkusen, Galatasary, Milan were all teams who at the time we were expected to cruise to victory over in CL play offs. Clubs that would have been about Seville level when we faced them.
We won't mention Rotor Volgograd and Bilbao in The Europa.
Fergie was able to evolve when his Euro tactics weren't working. Hopefully Mourinho too.
Yeah, does anybody still believe that?
Do you believe it?I don’t really care if anyone does or not. I’m just giving context for that tweet.
I feared he might throw them under the bus, but he did the opposite and shielded them - so that gives me a great deal of hope and suggests Mourinho remains committed.
......... what?Anyone expecting Mourinho to change or adapt is living on another planet.
The only thing stopping me from calling for his head is
He's still trying to come up with something......... what?
Huge fear is having to dump the potential KDBs in favour of the 'Oscars' if we are to truly commit to making his philosophy successful. I just don't buy that playing non-pragmatically and winning trophies are exclusive. That line of thought would never fly with the other mega giants in football Barcelona, Madrid or Bayern, a tier I believe we belong. Are we now supposed to invest a billion pounds to assemble the ultimate antifootball unit.I cannot wait.
Seems we're literally aiming to play at the theatre of dreams.
Fair play to you if you are glad he's appearing committed .
The thoughts of him being in charge next season is genuinely scary.
He's sucked the joy from the game.
How can anyone enjoy watching that shit week in week out?
Even the players look miserable .
Right fair enough play tight and narrow against big teams to try and nick the result ... not ideal but ok if you're getting results .
But every game? Why not go for the throat of the weaker teams.... why not let the players enjoy some freedom? Why not let the attacking players express themselves?