Zen86
Full Member
He’s supposedly done good things at the club but it’s been turbulent since he took up the DoF role. There’s no harm in keeping him and returning him to a role he’s more comfortable in. It happens all the time.
It's a weird argument though. Murtough proved a valuable asset in other remits, just not in this one. Don't see a problem keeping him if he's repositioned.https://theathletic.com/5151315/2023/12/22/manchester-united-fotball-news-transfers/
I think its been posted before, but I defy anybody to read this and still want Murtough at the club.
Great post Plant. There are still people on here that consider Mckennar and Carrick as useless coaches knowing f' all about either.Did I say that?
Brailsford and Ratcliffe are allegedly impressed by him as per report. Do you think the guy who engineered Britains Olympic success and Britains self made richest man are both stupid? I seriously doubt it.
Furthermore, nobody is suggesting Murtough stays in his current position. Clearly he will be replaced by far more experienced people which is as it should be. The report merely says he could be kept at the club ‘in some capacity’. He therefore can’t be as useless as all the hyperbole hero’s on here like to make out. I don’t think anyone is suggesting he doesn’t seem out of his comfort zone currently, but he obviously has talents that INEOS believe can be harnessed elsewhere with in the organisation.
As for ETH, at no point have I EVER stated he is faultless. My arguement has always been that there are extenuating circumstances for our performance this year, and sacking the manager and starting over isn’t the right way to go in my opinion.
It might have escaped your attention but ’the mess we are in’ has been building since 2013. Over a decade of incompetence and bad decisions have lead us to where we are now. 8 managers, £1bn in transfers and god knows how many players have failed to stop the rot which to me at least suggests the problem is wider than just replacing the manager.
If you must blame somebody why not start with J&A Glazer? They have presided over and signed off on over a decade of decline and decay. Maybe look at the influence of Woodward? His Spector of incompetence still looms large over this football club. His legacy is one of total destruction of the footballing dept by bad decision after bad decision, trying and failing spectacularly to spend his way out of his own problem. Consider maybe Moyes for getting rid of all remaining links to ‘the good old days’ by removing SAF backroom staff. There are a long line of people to blame for where we find the club today.
It will take time to rebuild, it will be a steady process of undoing the mistakes of the past and introducing new people and processes. I don’t believe it is as simple as merely pointing fingers and shouting ‘sack the dof, sell the manager!’. So get your facts straight or wind your neck in.
He will be assistant to Ashworth I’d imagine. It’s a major demotion but still the best job he could get at a big club right now. I don’t think he was even bad at his job per se. He was just representing owners who clearly had absolutely no plan. Anyone working for them was being hung out to dry.
I said the same a while ago. He was apparently very good setting up the academy again, an we are starting to see the fruits of this.Everything is pointing at a role in the academy. Which is fair enough since murtough did a good job there. In my opinion a different role would be a mistake. It's evident that murtough struggles at first team level
Looking for his (top) red stapler?I envision Milton from Office Space.
Sounds like a case of the Peter Principle in action - a talented employee who did a good job in lower roles, but then was promoted to the point of incompetence.
Who are the other three horsemen? The Glazers and EtH?One of the Four Horsemen. Three left.
Who are the other three horsemen? The Glazers and EtH?
Who are the other three horsemen? The Glazers and EtH?
Yeah, 53. How on earth could he walk unaided. I heard the canteen folk were fed up having to liquidise all his meals and clean up the chairs after him if he wasn't wearing his Tena Men stuff. He won't be missed.He was too old for this shit.
You barely see him. Weird.Fantastic news.
Sick of seeing his face and sly grin.
Pretty sure it's a Lethal Weapon reference.Yeah, 53. How on earth could he walk unaided. I heard the canteen folk were fed up having to liquidise all his meals and clean up the chairs after him if he wasn't wearing his Tena Men stuff. He won't be missed.
I'm assuming he's gonna stay, have his title changed and report to Wilcox.Is Fletcher leaving too? Why is he still a technical director at the club?
Is Fletcher leaving too? Why is he still a technical director at the club?
Pretty sure it's a Lethal Weapon reference.