ThierryHenry14
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 4,514
- Supports
- Arsenal
More like the worst decision for a move ever by his agent and the player himself.. If Felix joined City in 2019 now he would have been one of the players in the world..Surely one of the worst transfers ever?
1st season: 9 goals in 33 La Liga + Champions League games
2nd season: 10 in 39
3rd season: 1 in 12 so far
Back in 2019 it was reported City offered €90m or so for him but then he joined Atleti for €127m.
He should’ve gone to city. He would’ve been soSurely one of the worst transfers ever?
1st season: 9 goals in 33 La Liga + Champions League games
2nd season: 10 in 39
3rd season: 1 in 12 so far
Back in 2019 it was reported City offered €90m or so for him but then he joined Atleti for €127m.
He should’ve gone to city. He would’ve been so
much better today if he did. Atletico are a bad fit for players of his ilk.
A few whispers the other day that we might be interested in signing him.
I haven't seen him play for ages, but he looked special before he went to Atletico.
Might be an interesting option if its £40-50m?
I think so yes, has wasted some good years though. Absolute terrible career decision from him and his management but his quality on the ball is class.If we forgot about how much he cost -
Is he actually a good player?
If we forgot about how much he cost -
Is he actually a good player?
I had a dream a few weeks ago that we swapped Werner with Joao Felix and it ended up suiting both teams and both players down to the ground and everyone flourished.
So hard to know if a player will look good or bad outside of Athletico, I’d think he could still be a top player but he needs to be in an offensive possession based team. Could he compete with Jesus at City? Chelsea or them probably the best fit.A few whispers the other day that we might be interested in signing him.
I haven't seen him play for ages, but he looked special before he went to Atletico.
Might be an interesting option if its £40-50m?
He has his moments but he's been horribly used both at club and national level. He really did his career a disservice by going to Atleti - I suspect had he gone to City instead he'd be not quite in Haaland's bracket but not terribly far away.
I'd be much more worried about City if they got him instead of someone like Kane.
That's...actually a brilliant idea for all parties. Werner on the break out of Atleti's deep blocks would be a perfect fit.
Its everyones fault but Felix?
Players of the extreme upper echelon of the game finds ways to shine regardless of where they play, since they're just better players than everyone else.
I think his ceiling is that of his clubmate, Antoine Griezmann. A very good European striker, but two steps away from the games very best. Of course systems and environment play a big factor, a player like Memphis Depay who had a career turnaround after leaving the Premier League, but even he is still "just" a very good striker, and thats where I see Felix's best season. 20-24 La Liga goals.
I agree that he'd be a good fit for City and possibly Liverpool as well. Less convinced about Chelsea however if we didn't have so many strikers, I actually think he'd be a decent option to play in a 4-2-2-2 at United but he'd need to paired alongside someone we can rely on primarily for goals. In my mind him paired alongside Greenwood or Ronaldo could work pretty well.So hard to know if a player will look good or bad outside of Athletico, I’d think he could still be a top player but he needs to be in an offensive possession based team. Could he compete with Jesus at City? Chelsea or them probably the best fit.
He has his moments but he's been horribly used both at club and national level. He really did his career a disservice by going to Atleti - I suspect had he gone to City instead he'd be not quite in Haaland's bracket but not terribly far away.
I'd be much more worried about City if they got him instead of someone like Kane.
Yes, very much so. Simeone has completely botched his development because he doesn't trust him.If we forgot about how much he cost -
Is he actually a good player?
Yes, very much so. Simeone has completely botched his development because he doesn't trust him.
Move to Atletico came too soon, should have stuck at Benfica for a couple more years or went somewhere like Dortmund
He's a classic attacking mid/second striker. Where they play him isn't an issue, it's how they play that usually is, and how much they ask him to do on his own. He's a good dribbler but not really the hazard/vinicius type of ball carrier, he's a more associative player, like Griezmann. Difference is A) he moved there at 19, still far from a consistent performer at the level required of Atletico, B) he just doesn't have Griezmann's engine and defensive attitude and hardworking nature, and then Simeone always kept a too tight leash with him, soon as he had a poor game he'd yank him and then keep in on the bench the next game...I wrote a post above about how he plays and what type of player he is etc - can you let me know your opinion?
How has he been poorly used? I hardly watched him and I always thought of him like a False 9 player or support striker.
How would you say he plays (similarity to another player) and how is he being used at Atheltico?
Yh if he was the 10 and Greenwood was the 9 I assume that would suit their skillsets. I do wonder however if he’s one of these players like Dybala who everyone likes, we think they’ll be phenomenal in a top team but they never really become elite because their position is hard to define. Lautaro would probably be my realistic choice as a striker for our system alongside Greenwood.I agree that he'd be a good fit for City and possibly Liverpool as well. Less convinced about Chelsea however if we didn't have so many strikers, I actually think he'd be a decent option to play in a 4-2-2-2 at United but he'd need to paired alongside someone we can rely on primarily for goals. In my mind him paired alongside Greenwood or Ronaldo could work pretty well.
I think he fits into the bracket of Dybala. Good and talented player but probably requires a certain set up for him to thrive, certainly doesn't seem like a player you could throw into any team at all.Yh if he was the 10 and Greenwood was the 9 I assume that would suit their skillsets. I do wonder however if he’s one of these players like Dybala who everyone likes, we think they’ll be phenomenal in a top team but they never really become elite because their position is hard to define. Lautaro would probably be my realistic choice as a striker for our system alongside Greenwood.
Wow, I just checked to see his age and Dybala is 28! Jeez I feel old.
I think he fits into the bracket of Dybala. Good and talented player but probably requires a certain set up for him to thrive, certainly doesn't seem like a player you could throw into any team at all.
I think most wide attackers and more traditional no.9s should be capable of playing in a number of teams but I think the likes of Dybala and Felix are better suited to playing as a false 9 or as part of a pairing up front which makes them more difficult to incorporate. Most teams deploy a traditional no.9 and the days of having two strikers up front is not where near as common.Isn't that the same for most players?
He made an absolute error joining Simeone's team. I'm glad he joined them and not City. The kid had it all. He has wasted the first half of his career for more money.
He was top class tonight. Held the ball up very well, was skipping past our players with ease. What a header too.
Yeah it’s the first time I’ve seen him in a full game and his ball retention and weight of pass was really good.I'm a big fan of his and he should play a lot more for Atletico. Technically he's one of the best around.