Bilbo
TeaBaggins
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Messages
- 14,597
We've just gone ahead of Juve as favourites to sign him.
That would certainly send some shock-waves around the world if it somehow ever happened!
Favourites based on what?
We've just gone ahead of Juve as favourites to sign him.
That would certainly send some shock-waves around the world if it somehow ever happened!
Are you privy to some info we don't know?We've just gone ahead of Juve as favourites to sign him.
That would certainly send some shock-waves around the world if it somehow ever happened!
Are you privy to some info we don't know?
Favourites based on what?
Are you privy to some info we don't know?
Probably talking about odds
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/player-specials/joao-felix/club-after-summer-transfer-window
Oddly enough Wolves are current favourites according to BetVictor
He looks like exactly what we need, which is why we won’t get him
I don't think he'll go for anywhere close to his buyout clause. £50m - £60m I'm thinking..
Not really. It's commonly used outside betting to the extent that it wouldn't be immediately obvious.I thought the term 'favourites' always referred to the betting?
@Tarrou, give yourself a pat on the back. Although it's not that 'odd' given the Portuguese connections
On the bench, backup to LingardIf we play diamond formation, would you play Felix as striker or No.10?
Felix is too good to be benched. He's probably a lot better than Rashford when it comes to finishing. He can operate as a False 9 but I would almost play him behind Rashford in the No. 10 role as a trequartista. A formation of 4-2-3-1 or a 4-2-4 would give us a lot of balance. With 2 double pivot box to box midfielders operating behind Felix, that would offer us cover for our leaky defense.
Then all we'd have to do is get two box to box midfielders from somewhere... Honestly, it'd be easier to fix the defense than get two midfielders that can hold their own at the level we want to get to.
At the top of Oles favoured diamond.Felix is too good to be benched. He's probably a lot better than Rashford when it comes to finishing. He can operate as a False 9 but I would almost play him behind Rashford in the No. 10 role as a trequartista. A formation of 4-2-3-1 or a 4-2-4 would give us a lot of balance. With 2 double pivot box to box midfielders operating behind Felix, that would offer us cover for our leaky defense.
Probably, but we really need to get someone in for Lukaku too. Or just general quality as an option. Martial and Rashford need to step up, and Sanchez is shit.if we are to spend huge on a forward the first priority is right wing isn't it?
Probably, but we really need to get someone in for Lukaku too. Or just general quality as an option. Martial and Rashford need to step up, and Sanchez is shit.
Yeah it's true that Rashford's been working so much harder than Martial, but for me he still hasn't been good enough. Missing chances and making bad decisions is his downfall.Rashford has been putting in the effort, while TM, feck knows?
If we play 433, can he play as lone striker?
High praise indeed!Yeah it's true that Rashford's been working so much harder than Martial, but for me he still hasn't been good enough. Missing chances and making bad decisions is his downfall.
Obviously I don't want to get rid but like I said we need an injection of pure quality and this fella looks like the next Messi
I have seen him play as CAM/No.10/Second striker. He has a really good vision and I have been impressed by his defensive workrate. He would be perfect in a diamond formation.Why would you want him as a lone striker? Have you actually watched him play? He isn't a striker.
Reasonably skillful? You have high standardsI don't really get this. Plenty of people have done it in portugal. This guy is looks slow and reasonably skillful but nothing insane. If we could get him for 50m as a punt we should but counting on this guy to make us into a consistent premiership outfit is hype on hype
Okay, I hope that I wan't offend anyone but when I read some posts and when I see some formations that people suggest, I think that they are based on the way how they play Fifa on Playstation.
Where and how would he fit? Physically he doesn't look suited for PL. Besides, he is the type of player that we would need to adjust the whole system around him. And how smart would it be to build the team and game around the unproved kid?
Second, we don't need some insane transfers right now. Splashing anywhere between 80 and 100 mil for the 19 years old player with only 1 season of professional football would be stupid and insane. Rebuild of of this team should be done in a smart and rational way. It would be better to buy Julian Brandt for 20 mil (his release clause) if we want someone with the playmaking skills and promote someone from our youth squad. Spend that cash to improve the team in other positions.
Yeah it's true that Rashford's been working so much harder than Martial, but for me he still hasn't been good enough. Missing chances and making bad decisions is his downfall.
Obviously I don't want to get rid but like I said we need an injection of pure quality and this fella looks like the next Messi
Just watching his highlights videos and watching the ball bobbling off his feet and it always looks a bit flukey and like he might be benefiting from playing a very low standard of opposition 90% of the time. Would we really hear about this lad as being wort 150m if he hadn't scored a goal every 1.8 games over a very small sample size? I'm not sure.Reasonably skillful? You have high standards
Can't argue with this. If we are relying on Rashford as our #1 striker next year we are in big trouble. He has not been good enough. He needs competition. I think he will be great, but we need more scoring options next year for sure. Martial.....I just can't wrap my head around what the hell is wrong with him, beyond frustrating.
Would be absurd if he did. 100M for a player with only 1 season under his belt is the same mistake Bayern did with Sanches.I don't think he'll go for anywhere close to his buyout clause. £50m - £60m I'm thinking..
Rashford is like that boy in his late teens whose father dies and he has to wear the man pants on the house and take care of his siblings. Huge potential but given the mission of leading the line of a decadent MUFC at the age of 21 clearly is too much pressure on him. He should be led by example from a better and more experienced striker. Lukaku should be that guy. Oh well...
I saw him live 3 weeks ago, he looked slow but had good positioning. I don't think he's worth 60mI don't really get this. Plenty of people have done it in portugal. This guy is looks slow and reasonably skillful but nothing insane. If we could get him for 50m as a punt we should but counting on this guy to make us into a consistent premiership outfit is hype on hype
It doesn't look flukey at all. I just think he has more ingenuity than the normal technician. He's not afraid to try stuff and thinks of solutions on the fly.Just watching his highlights videos and watching the ball bobbling off his feet and it always looks a bit flukey and like he might be benefiting from playing a very low standard of opposition 90% of the time. Would we really hear about this lad as being wort 150m if he hadn't scored a goal every 1.8 games over a very small sample size? I'm not sure.
?Brandt is defensive liability. He looks more of a classic 10. Anyway, I would rather have Sandro Tonali in our midfield. He would probably be cheaper.