croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,768
Not interested in the money Athletico want. If he is available on a loan with an option to buy for a reasonable price, it may make some sense.
Yeah loan or walk away for me
Not interested in the money Athletico want. If he is available on a loan with an option to buy for a reasonable price, it may make some sense.
He’s for sale and we should be all over him
Honestly, I have been thinking about this, if we buy Joao Felix -- I don't think we are buying him as a striker. I think we are buying him as a midfielder (long term at least), and not even for Bruno's role, but more as a FDJ type/No 8. Eriksson's role. Our De Bruyne.
And I mean, its only when you look at his potential value in that role -- that any kind of higher valuation starts to make sense for him. Like sure, as a shadow no 9 for us, he would create some magic. Him dropping down, Rashford and Bruno taking runs, a YT collection of his top plays for us in the spring of 23' wouldn't be just 40 sec long. But -- there is so much you do not get from him as a Sh-9, right? The PL is an unforgiving league. There will be so many times some mid table team just takes it to us and we scramble to get the ball up to a striker who is just manhandled by the defense most of the time. You don't get much presence in the box. Just look at his stats for Athletico, he doesn't score on will. He has played plenty for them and the 7-8 worst team's in La Liga are much weaker than in the PL. AtM isn't a 40% possession team against Elche and the likes. Over the course of a season, if you play Felix as your striker, you would surely get 4-5 wondrous really important goals scored and manufactured by him -- but you would probably not get 15 in total.
But if you instead ask yourself, what could Joao Felix become in the Kevin de Bruyne role, is the potential there? I mean, its as simple as, its with his ball on his feet looking up field with people taking runs in front of him, his biggest strength lies. Almost every time I have seen him play in Spain, its there he excels. He is underwhelming up front. I think many would be surprised how little he does for AtM in some games over 90 minutes against a pretty poor opponent. But its in like these situations where he stands out, and where you want him:
I have changed my mind a bit thinking it through the last days, assuming that ETH really likes him, that the reports are true, what am I missing, could he have value I didn't see before? And its as a midfielder I see that value. Now I have gone from 'sure I take him, but sticking a value tag to him above 50m is ridiculous, its like Chelsea asking for 100m for Kepa', to can you get it done for 80m -- do it.
This year he would come to us, be eased in, play some as a Shadow 9, some in Bruno's role, some on the wings. Let him learn ETH's system. But start to ease him in to Eriksen's role. Then from the start of next season -- he is the starting MF with Casemiro and Bruno. Eriksen is the rotation player. I love Eriksen. But counting on him to be an insane workhorse for us carries us 50 games a season is insane. Many had questions about his durability 3-4 years ago, for good reasons.
Honestly, I have been thinking about this, if we buy Joao Felix -- I don't think we are buying him as a striker. I think we are buying him as a midfielder (long term at least), and not even for Bruno's role, but more as a FDJ type/No 8. Eriksson's role. Our De Bruyne.
And I mean, its only when you look at his potential value in that role -- that any kind of higher valuation starts to make sense for him. Like sure, as a shadow no 9 for us, he would create some magic. Him dropping down, Rashford and Bruno taking runs, a YT collection of his top plays for us in the spring of 23' wouldn't be just 40 sec long. But -- there is so much you do not get from him as a Sh-9, right? The PL is an unforgiving league. There will be so many times some mid table team just takes it to us and we scramble to get the ball up to a striker who is just manhandled by the defense most of the time. You don't get much presence in the box. Just look at his stats for Athletico, he doesn't score on will. He has played plenty for them and the 7-8 worst team's in La Liga are much weaker than in the PL. AtM isn't a 40% possession team against Elche and the likes. Over the course of a season, if you play Felix as your striker, you would surely get 4-5 wondrous really important goals scored and manufactured by him -- but you would probably not get 15 in total.
But if you instead ask yourself, what could Joao Felix become in the Kevin de Bruyne role, is the potential there? I mean, its as simple as, its with his ball on his feet looking up field with people taking runs in front of him, his biggest strength lies. Almost every time I have seen him play in Spain, its there he excels. He is underwhelming up front. I think many would be surprised how little he does for AtM in some games over 90 minutes against a pretty poor opponent. But its in like these situations where he stands out, and where you want him:
I have changed my mind a bit thinking it through the last days, assuming that ETH really likes him, that the reports are true, what am I missing, could he have value I didn't see before? And its as a midfielder I see that value. Now I have gone from 'sure I take him, but sticking a value tag to him above 50m is ridiculous, its like Chelsea asking for 100m for Kepa', to can you get it done for 80m -- do it.
This year he would come to us, be eased in, play some as a Shadow 9, some in Bruno's role, some on the wings. Let him learn ETH's system. But start to ease him in to Eriksen's role. Then from the start of next season -- he is the starting MF with Casemiro and Bruno. Eriksen is the rotation player. I love Eriksen. But counting on him to be an insane workhorse for us carries us 50 games a season is insane. Many had questions about his durability 3-4 years ago, for good reasons.
Not a chance we are signing him as a midfielder.
ETH played with Eriksen as a striker once in the first game of the season. It failed badly. It changed second half. It Didn’t happen again. Terrible example.ETH have played with Eriksen as a striker this season when he did not have any alternatives, so he would of course use Joao Felix there if needed.
But his potential as a striker is limited, however at midfield it is unlimited from my POV. I also wouldn't at all be surprised if ETH also sees Felix as a CM/AMC long term. Felix is a fairly versatile player. Simone has had him working as a right back. He would never ever be a big hit as a lone striker for a Premier League team. Why would we spend that kind of money for him it we only intended to use him in a role in which his potential is limited? (from my POV, others can of course disagree)
I think you’re pigeon holing a bit too much here. Just look at how we’ve played with Martial this season, it’s far from a typical striker role and that’s likely to be closer to what a Felix would play (Felix is also deceptively tall, can definitely be a body in the box when necessary) with bringing the wide men into it for goalscoringETH have played with Eriksen as a striker this season when he did not have any alternatives, so he would of course use Joao Felix there if needed.
But his potential as a striker is limited, however at midfield it is unlimited from my POV. I also wouldn't at all be surprised if ETH also sees Felix as a CM/AMC long term. Felix is a fairly versatile player. Simone has had him working as a right back. He would never ever be a big hit as a lone striker for a Premier League team. Why would we spend that kind of money for him it we only intended to use him in a role in which his potential is limited?
I think you’re pigeon holing a bit too much here. Just look at how we’ve played with Martial this season, it’s far from a typical striker role and that’s likely to be closer to what a Felix would play (Felix is also deceptively tall, can definitely be a body in the box when necessary) with bringing the wide men into it for goalscoring
ETH have played with Eriksen as a striker this season when he did not have any alternatives, so he would of course use Joao Felix there if needed.
But his potential as a striker is limited, however at midfield it is unlimited from my POV. I also wouldn't at all be surprised if ETH also sees Felix as a CM/AMC long term. Felix is a fairly versatile player. Simone has had him working as a right back. He would never ever be a big hit as a lone striker for a Premier League team. Why would we spend that kind of money for him it we only intended to use him in a role in which his potential is limited? (from my POV, others can of course disagree)
I think you’re pigeon holing a bit too much here. Just look at how we’ve played with Martial this season, it’s far from a typical striker role and that’s likely to be closer to what a Felix would play (Felix is also deceptively tall, can definitely be a body in the box when necessary) with bringing the wide men into it for goalscoring
If he doesn’t do enough defensive work as a forward in Spain, what makes you think playing him in a midfield role in the premier league is going to work? You compared him to De Bruyne in an earlier post, but De Bruyne puts a shift in every game, Felix does not. That would never work in a team that presses. I’d argue he wouldn’t even work as a striker for us for the same reason, along with the fact he doesn’t score anywhere near enough. He’s a super talented player and will be brilliant for somebody, but he’s a poor match for what we want. If simeone can’t get him working his arse off and pressing, I have serious doubts EtH would be able to.
If he doesn’t do enough defensive work as a forward in Spain, what makes you think playing him in a midfield role in the premier league is going to work? You compared him to De Bruyne in an earlier post, but De Bruyne puts a shift in every game, Felix does not. That would never work in a team that presses. I’d argue he wouldn’t even work as a striker for us for the same reason, along with the fact he doesn’t score anywhere near enough. He’s a super talented player and will be brilliant for somebody, but he’s a poor match for what we want. If simeone can’t get him working his arse off and pressing, I have serious doubts EtH would be able to.
Defensive Actions are closer than you think. Per fbref
Tackles + Interceptions
Felix - 1.24 per 90
de Bruyne - 1.37
Ariel Duels Won
Felix - 1.19 per 90
de Bruyne - 0.42
Ariel Duals Lost
Felix - 1.61 per 90
de Bruyne - 0.65
I'm not sure the notion that de Bruyne is a better defensive player is supported by the underlying data.
Defensive Actions are closer than you think. Per fbref
Tackles + Interceptions
Felix - 1.24 per 90
de Bruyne - 1.37
Ariel Duels Won
Felix - 1.19 per 90
de Bruyne - 0.42
Ariel Duals Lost
Felix - 1.61 per 90
de Bruyne - 0.65
I'm not sure the notion that de Bruyne is a better defensive player is supported by the underlying data.
This is the most reactionary forum I’ve been on Doesn’t take much for you lot, does it?
This is the most reactionary forum I’ve been on Doesn’t take much for you lot, does it?
Felix is the greatest player to have every graced this gameThis is the most reactionary forum I’ve been on Doesn’t take much for you lot, does it?
It is incredible how much the opinions of players sways from game to game. So very predictable.
It’s a forum with thousands of members posting different opinions, RedCafe doesn’t speak with one voice.