KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,914
I'm not sure what you're saying here to be honest. Create = compare? Is that some weird autocorrect?
Yeah feck auto correct, wanted to say compare ffs.
I'm not sure what you're saying here to be honest. Create = compare? Is that some weird autocorrect?
In that case: of course we can compare. Actually, now I come to think of it, the Thomas Müller comparison was a good one. They have similar strengths.Yeah feck auto correct, wanted to say compare ffs.
And there's my point....more about the dancing than the goal he's scored. The irony.
Yeah, he's got the potential to do it.With his ability to strike the ball from distance and the way he can find space to get into goal scoring positions, I really do hope he can become a regular 15-20 goals a season player.
The goal (great that it was) is completely irrelevant when we're discussing how likable he is to rivals.
I don't care if he dances when he scores but it would certainly annoy rival fans. That's just common sense (see Griezmann or Sturridge for other examples).
Thomas Mueller. Just with superior technical skill.My first thought was Lampard but that's a bit lazy, mostly because of the good movement/goalscoring. Can't really think of a good comparison.
I don’t think it is. It’s the several matches he’s played for England where we are seeing the fruits of his labours that has convinced people.Wow, let's wait til the world cup is over before declaring him our savior. Great goal, good performance. Against Panama.
Don't forget the rather barren patch for the last 2 months of the season for United.
One match really shouldn't sway opinions this much. Useful squad player.
I think it's clear he suits the 3-5-2 formation, that was when his "Purple" patch came.Wow, let's wait til the world cup is over before declaring him our savior. Great goal, good performance. Against Panama.
Don't forget the rather barren patch for the last 2 months of the season for United.
One match really shouldn't sway opinions this much. Useful squad player.
Don't think it is truth that formation affects his performance that much. He's great in other systems too. The important thing for Lingard is that he plays centrally and have some freedom to make runs. He would thrive for us in a griezmann role for example but his technical ability or level or reputation is not big enough to be trusted but his good allround game will make him a usefull player in more positions. I think he's average as RW though and slightly bellow his top level as b2b, even though southgate uses him a lot there because he's disciplined. He was certainly good against Panama and for England in his new role for England but he's even better when he's more advanced. Looks a bit underutilized there in midfield but good that he's getting games at WC for England, who would have thought few years back. He will get more confidence and very valuable experience.I think it's clear he suits the 3-5-2 formation, that was when his "Purple" patch came.
the usual 4-2-3-1 is too spread out and he suffers, but in the 3-5-2 the players are much closer together in the middle and it suits his pass / move style. He's great at making those 3rd man runs also, when having 2 strikers ahead it helps take up the defenders attention.
Anyone's listened to Scholsey's interview re Southgate letting Lingard flourosh & having more faith in him than Mou?
If the quotes I've read are accurate it's probably time Scholes just gave up on punditry because it's so misinformed and petty, I'm a bit embarassed for him. Mou has developed Lingard beyond recognition (he became Messi LinGod this season ffs) and this season's form has earnt him the England call up....
Anyone's listened to Scholsey's interview re Southgate letting Lingard flourosh & having more faith in him than Mou?
If the quotes I've read are accurate it's probably time Scholes just gave up on punditry because it's so misinformed and petty, I'm a bit embarassed for him. Mou has developed Lingard beyond recognition (he became Messi LinGod this season ffs) and this season's form has earnt him the England call up....
Heard it and it's downright embarrassing and not true at all. Lingard has had great time under Jose and it seems Scholes had a dig at him just for the sake of it. There are enough sticks to beat Jose with, Lingard form and Jose's faith not being one of them..Anyone's listened to Scholsey's interview re Southgate letting Lingard flourosh & having more faith in him than Mou?
If the quotes I've read are accurate it's probably time Scholes just gave up on punditry because it's so misinformed and petty, I'm a bit embarassed for him. Mou has developed Lingard beyond recognition (he became Messi LinGod this season ffs) and this season's form has earnt him the England call up....
And he’s played better for United than he has for England. I didn’t see those comments from Scholes but if they’re true, it clearly highlights an agenda.
Wtf... Scholes has personal issues with Mourinho I think because Lingard is probably the only attacking player that has progressed under Mourinho. You can say this about Martial and Rashford but not Lingard.Anyone's listened to Scholsey's interview re Southgate letting Lingard flourosh & having more faith in him than Mou?
If the quotes I've read are accurate it's probably time Scholes just gave up on punditry because it's so misinformed and petty, I'm a bit embarassed for him. Mou has developed Lingard beyond recognition (he became Messi LinGod this season ffs) and this season's form has earnt him the England call up....
The one in ten in man, proves me right again. He was poor again, thank God he want taking a pen!!
Yes because he was brilliant, with his off the ball movement and stuff that can’t be realistically judged. He was crap.If you think Lingard was poor today I guess you must have watched an entirely different match from Southgate and I.
Yes because he was brilliant, with his off the ball movement and stuff that can’t be realistically judged. He was crap.
The one in ten in man, proves me right again. He was poor again, thank God he wasn’t taking a pen!!
Let’s try judging him on actual on the ball contribution. Oh no because that means he’s crap.Lol yeah that's all he did. Try watching a game with your head screwed in.
Let’s try jusging him on actual on the ball contribution. Oh no because that means he’s crap.
Excellent movement, one of the best, but still lacks that bit of technical skill in the final third. Many times a better shot or better pass from him and itd be a goal.
Lol yes that’s the Lingard fan brigade in one paragraph...Contributions go beyond goals and assists. If you think he was crap you're just highlighting your own ignorance to that fact.
Lol yes that’s the Lingard fan brigade in one paragraph...
I don't want to jump on Lingard's back after the entire England team looked pretty uninspiring, but not sure how can that performance be described as anything different than poor.If you think Lingard was poor today I guess you must have watched an entirely different match from Southgate and I.