Decomposing In Paris
Full Member
Can I leave this here?
Coleraine Showgrounds?
Can I leave this here?
Also a common theme amongst those three are a lack of decent attacking football from their teams.Good sides need a mix of players with different attributes. There is a reason that diverse managers - first Van Gaal, then Mourinho, now Southgate for England - keep selecting him. He works hard and has a really good football iq, in that he understands movement, space, and how his movement can affect other things on the pitch. He doesn't have a lot of talent with the ball at his feet, and he'll always be a complementary player rather than a star man for that reason, but its a testament to his determination that he has come this far despite those limitations.
It's tediously cringe.I'm convinced that some posters on here genuinely want some of our players to flop just so they can prove a point. The ones who pops up in threads just to say "I told you so" when a player underperforms, and vanishes instantly when said player has done brilliantly. Not so different from RAWK really.
I'm convinced that some posters on here genuinely want some of our players to flop just so they can prove a point. The ones who pops up in threads just to say "I told you so" when a player underperforms, and vanishes instantly when said player has done brilliantly. Not so different from RAWK really.
Apart of his off the ball movement , He isn't actually good in anything else.
Lingard's work rate against Colombia was just awesome.
Distance covered - 15.3 kms. Next best was Henderson - 14.2 kms
Sprints - 60, next best was Trippier with 48
Top speed - 33.52 km/hr, Walker also clocked same speed.
https://resources.fifa.com/image/up...-pdf-2981796.pdf?cloudid=salcaolmwrdmmyd4r47d
I don't think it's that, he doesn't have the technique for incisive passing in the final third.He gets into some good positions, particularly behind the full backs. His descision making once he's received the ball in those positions is what lets him down. He often turns back and doesn't have the knack to find a player in the box, so he's missing too many opportunities too create goals and results with his fantastic movement.
He's a strange player, so intelligent movement but still lacking awareness to create for others.
Of course he does he's not even talking about difficult passes, just quick decision making and finding a pass to a players feet, rather than just kicking it into an area.I don't think it's that, he doesn't have the technique for incisive passing in the final third.
Well said.I'm convinced that some posters on here genuinely want some of our players to flop just so they can prove a point. The ones who pops up in threads just to say "I told you so" when a player underperforms, and vanishes instantly when said player has done brilliantly. Not so different from RAWK really.
I think Lingard was immense in that game and covered up a lot of other peoples mistakes. Alli offered very little so Lingard was covering more territory than he should have. He got Walker out of jail when he bombed forward and lost possession - Colombia was launching a massive counter attack and had us completely outmanned and Jesse got in a crucial tackle that even they could not complain about.Yeah but with walker, that will have been him chasing back after practically putting the Colombians through on goal.
Every England team needs a Man Utd scapegoat. Sad that so many Utd fans have pre-selected Lingard to make it easier for the great unwashed when the inevitable happens.
He is always receiving the ball in movement, he doesn't have the touch or control to make a smart pass, that's why he is making hurried passes in the final third. He knows the presence of his teammate, he has the awareness but lacks the technique to pick the pass.Of course he does he's not even talking about difficult passes, just quick decision making and finding a pass to a players feet, rather than just kicking it into an area.
Lingard's work rate against Colombia was just awesome.
Distance covered - 15.3 kms. Next best was Henderson - 14.2 kms
Sprints - 60, next best was Trippier with 48
Top speed - 33.52 km/hr, Walker also clocked same speed.
https://resources.fifa.com/image/up...-pdf-2981796.pdf?cloudid=salcaolmwrdmmyd4r47d
If you believe this its no wonder you and others are flabbergasted by his continued inclusion. Bollocks tho, as Adam said, we aren't talking about difficult intricate passing here.He is always receiving the ball in movement, he doesn't have the touch or control to make a smart pass, that's why he is making hurried passes in the final third. He knows the presence of his teammate, he has the awareness but lacks the technique to pick the pass.
I'm convinced that some posters on here genuinely want some of our players to flop just so they can prove a point. The ones who pops up in threads just to say "I told you so" when a player underperforms, and vanishes instantly when said player has done brilliantly. Not so different from RAWK really.
Our most criticized players doing well at this tournament.
Loving this .
It's only Sweden they will tell us.It’s the best part. All these long posts from the caf experts about how these players are average and they go on playing in the World Cup semis
It's only Sweden they will tell us.
Sweden played a role in Italy, Netherlands and Germany not being here still at this tournament.
They got more points than them while playing the same opposition..What did they do to have Germany out of the World cup?