- Joined
- Aug 31, 2015
- Messages
- 147
Isn't that a great way to get around losing anything due to a sell on clause though? Wouldn't it be more likely for a team selling such a player to accept such a deal? If Lille value one of our players at £50m and want them and value their player at £50m, then wouldn't that deal make more sense to them than selling said player for £50m but only receiving £40m? In the former situation they've broke even on value, in the latter situation they've lost some value.That's never going to happen if you read the above tweet and their information is right.
Everton need £40-45m profit so I think we'll go for Branthwaite at £45+10/15m in add ons. Onana is more tricky as Lille have a 20% sell on, so adding players into the deal is severly unrealistic.
Imagine a player has a 99% sell on clause. Would you rather sell that player or player-swap?