Scarecrow
Having a week off
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 12,374
Count one more in the "Nah" camp.
Edit: Poll?
Edit: Poll?
PereiraAnyone who says we don't need a no.10 is absolutely off their rocker.
We've done better in a 3-man-midfield. Having a shiny new number 10 could mean having to accommodate him by using a formation that is not necessarily optimal for our other players or having to play said number 10 on the wing, which is not optimal for him. It's important to asses the entire squad and decide where the new player would fit within that context.It really isn't. Rooney and Mata are absolute muck, Ander has been just as bad, and Fellaini is not a serious option.
Yeah, that's all well and nice, and I'd probably prefer that too, but van Gaal is never going to use the 4-3-3 (in this sense) and Mourinho's last couple of sides have been the same; a 4231 with a no.10.We've done better in a 3-man-midfield. Having a shiny new number 10 could mean having to accommodate him by using a formation that is not necessarily optimal for our other players or having to play said number 10 on the wing, which is not optimal for him. It's important to asses the entire squad and decide where the new player would fit within that context.
Arsenal, for example, have had the perfect players for 4:3:3 in the last few years but there's no place for Ozil in that, so they have to compromise. To the detriment of the team, in my humble opinion.
Well, feck'em then.Yeah, that's all well and nice, and I'd probably prefer that too, but van Gaal is never going to use the 4-3-3 (in this sense) and Mourinho's last couple of sides have been the same; a 4231 with a no.10.
Of course it needs addressing but there are more pressing areas of concern in the squad. Rashford is our only acceptable option up front and our options for the right wing are absolutely pitiful. The midfield is arguably as bad too.It really isn't. Rooney and Mata are absolute muck, Ander has been just as bad, and Fellaini is not a serious option.
This, there are more urgent matters to sort out in this squad before we address the #10 position. That isn't to say it doesn't need improving though.Of course it needs addressing but there are more pressing areas of concern in the squad. Rashford is our only acceptable option up front and our options for the right wing are absolutely pitiful. The midfield is arguably as bad too.
Just what we need, another exorbitantly priced, one paced luxury player.
Err... He is perfectly suited for the hybrid #8 - Iniesta/ Di María type dribbling midfielder role:I'd rather someone more athletic to be honest, plus I'd rather we went 433 than persist with 4231
He would offer the versatility to play as a #10, the position represented in the graphic above, and as a narrow forward in a 4-3-3. A fit and firing James is among the top 10 attacking talents around IMO, and an aberration of a season isn't sufficient to change that. We could do much, much worse than buying him in the summer. And in terms of being a Madrid reject - this is a club that created the conditions for Robben, Makélélé, Sneijder, Özil, Di María to leave - in the decent decade (sort of).
He's got quite short legs.Why is he one paced?
I thought he was a massive waste of money when Madrid bought him and I'm not surprised they're trying to get rid. United should stay far away.
Of course, he'd be nice. But he isn't exactly what I'd call a priority. We're in need of a striker and a right winger a lot more.
His signing would depend upon how we want to play next season, which is dependant on the manager. If we're going to play exclusively with a #10 then you bring him in and build the rest of the side around that. If not, he's a bit of a square peg/round hole signing.
The exact opposite of what we need, we need a proper winger with pace and a goal threat a feel James is best at #10 and like Mata is too slow for the wing.
I don't want.
Always like to hear the opinions of opposition supporters when we're linked with someone.
Do you mind giving your general view, as in the chances of him leaving, where you think he'll go and how much it'd4 take for you to let him go etc?
He isn't slow, he isn't slow at all and he isn't weak either. He is a #10 and has the tools for that position but the comparisons with Mata are really bad.
Edit: The caf sees Mata's ersatz everywhere, when Mata is pretty unique.
We needed a number 10 last year and people came up with the same argument about De Bruyne.. Plus we are not going the just sign one player.. This isn't the late Fergie era.
So has Messi.He's got quite short legs.
He's not fast either and he's not great in the wide positions, we don't need a #10 so what would be the point? it's signing a big name player just for the sake of it, one of the reasons we've been wank in the transfer market the past few years.
How would everyone feel about this if we bought Zlatan too?
We would have to purchase a very quick right winger to compliment Martial on the left...
Problem with that is Zlatan likes to float around and drop deep, we'd need someone running in behind him all the time. Matuidi does that at PSG as part of a three man midfield, only midfielder we have to do that would probably be Herrera who wouldn't play if we signed James and Zlatan.
He isn't slow, he isn't slow at all and he isn't weak either.