AneRu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2019
- Messages
- 3,626
I think people easily forget that in order for young players to succeed they need investment in time and faith. It's a tricky balancing act between not throwing away too many matches and investing the needed time for them to get to grips with the pace and standard of first team football.People demand every youngster to be Mbappe/Sancho levels and immediately dominate games. They don't have any patience and remember the bad games over the good ones. Every mistake is also pounced on (the entire team not just our youngsters) while anything good is relatively ignored. It's toxic. Yet it's always been this way, I can think of so many young players that came through at the club and got insulted and discarded after a bad game or two.
I'm perhaps guilty myself of hyping our young players up but I always stress that it's potential. We have no idea how these young players will react to the pressure and intensity of first team football. Some players are simply not cut out for it, while others (who might not have the same talent as their peers) thrive on it. But there is no way you can assess a player after just 90 minutes of football, you need to give them at least 3 clear opportunities if only to be able to rectify their mistakes.
As for Garner, the lad has undeniable talent and despite making some errors yesterday he showed his ability at times. He'll get more opportunities and shouldn't be going on loan unless we buy in January (which I hope we do) at that point he can probably go on loan.
For me, the decision is made easier by the fact that we are screwed either way unless the kids become so bad that the confidence can be damaged. Let's face it, we are going to struggle and drop points if we rely on Mata, Lingard, Matic and Rojo so we are better off building up our youngsters than wasting minutes on players that aren't going to improve. The upside is huge if, say, Greenwood makes it or Garner does as it would save millions in fees.