- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,287
- Supports
- ️
Pfft definitely happening today. Get a load of this guy.They say it everyday mate, don't read too much into it. Just muppets doing muppet things.
Pfft definitely happening today. Get a load of this guy.They say it everyday mate, don't read too much into it. Just muppets doing muppet things.
I think you guys make valid points.
I‘d been thinking in my head how the coming couple years may seriously impact our spending on transfers due to the spending departments like wages etc. The pandemic has essentially abolished ways to be able to calculate what our aggregate revenues could look like on a year to year basis and hence plan ahead. Pessimists like me wouldn’t even be surprised if spending on Sancho causes our transfer spending to not even go beyond 50m next two windows or something like that.
Our wage bill will most likely remain the same or a tad bit higher with Sancho & Pogbas new contract. Sure getting rid of wages from players like Lingard, Rojo, Smalling etc may reduce it but there will be other replacements brought in as well.
The club obviously plans a couple years in advance and they must surely know they need to keep substantial reserves on hand just to guarantee the coverage of essential expenses for at least the next 5 years.
When clubs like Arsenal are letting go of staff, it’s a very alarming situation in regards to how much they’ve cut down on their annual expense budget. Makes me wonder where is our club taking into account the impact of COVID and offsetting any resulting losses that we’ve incurred.
Moreover, until fans are allowed back in, and I’m not talking socially distanced audiences, I’d imagine full stadium audience revenues is what would allow us to maybe dip in our reserves again more comfortably. And until that happens I’d assume our transfer budgets may even be redirected towards other expenses instead of utilizing reserves if need be.
But at the same time I think being back in the CL along with avoiding a deduction in our Adidas income as a result of our return to the competition will also go a long way.
I also think our academy is truly helping us A LOT at the moment. We’ve had players like Rashford, McT, Greenwood and Williams save us critical outlays and the emergence of players like Mengi, Laird, Mejbri etc may also allow us to limit our outlays next few years.
On a side note - keeping all this in mind, what are your opinions on bringing in players this summer. It’s clear our squad needs reinforcements but I think Sancho being a generational talent does justify having to spend an impractical amount despite the current pandemics’ effect. As well as despite the fact that it’ll be at a cost of foregoing other acquisitions. Sacrifices will have to be made somewhere. Should it be quality over quantity or vice versa?
We’d also again have to rely on our academy to provide reinforcements but not sure if the players I mentioned are ready to come into the fold right away. If they can be then that’s basically avoiding buying new players and redirecting those funds towards other obligations.
For instance Greenwood & Williams have literally helped avoid a sum equivalent to what a player of their caliber would’ve cost us in today’s market while also taking into consideration an ongoing pandemic. Mind-boggling! But a blessing no doubt.
Thanks for the kind words mate!Good post! I agree with all of that.
Buying Sancho in this window is a huge risk even if he's a generational talent. We're in urgent need of immediate back up to Bruno and Shaw if we're going to compete in both the PL and CL. Bruno and McT instead of Matic is also a huge step down i quality.
Next seasons schedule is brutal. We maybe need to find players on loan. Coutinho isn't all that bad from my perspective. In fact whatever it takes to piss off Arsenal is good enough reason for me.
I also have big hopes regarding a couple of our youngsters. Teden Mengi is one in particular I looking forward to see develop.
They like to set themselves up for disappointment I guess.Why do some people think today is the day? I'm assuming I've missed something when skimming through the thread.
I think you guys make valid points.
I‘d been thinking in my head how the coming couple years may seriously impact our spending on transfers due to the spending departments like wages etc. The pandemic has essentially abolished ways to be able to calculate what our aggregate revenues could look like on a year to year basis and hence plan ahead. Pessimists like me wouldn’t even be surprised if spending on Sancho causes our transfer spending to not even go beyond 50m next two windows or something like that.
Our wage bill will most likely remain the same or a tad bit higher with Sancho & Pogbas new contract. Sure getting rid of wages from players like Lingard, Rojo, Smalling etc may reduce it but there will be other replacements brought in as well.
The club obviously plans a couple years in advance and they must surely know they need to keep substantial reserves on hand just to guarantee the coverage of essential expenses for at least the next 5 years.
When clubs like Arsenal are letting go of staff, it’s a very alarming situation in regards to how much they’ve cut down on their annual expense budget. Makes me wonder where is our club taking into account the impact of COVID and offsetting any resulting losses that we’ve incurred.
Moreover, until fans are allowed back in, and I’m not talking socially distanced audiences, I’d imagine full stadium audience revenues is what would allow us to maybe dip in our reserves again more comfortably. And until that happens I’d assume our transfer budgets may even be redirected towards other expenses instead of utilizing reserves if need be.
But at the same time I think being back in the CL along with avoiding a deduction in our Adidas income as a result of our return to the competition will also go a long way.
I also think our academy is truly helping us A LOT at the moment. We’ve had players like Rashford, McT, Greenwood and Williams save us critical outlays and the emergence of players like Mengi, Laird, Mejbri etc may also allow us to limit our outlays next few years.
On a side note - keeping all this in mind, what are your opinions on bringing in players this summer. It’s clear our squad needs reinforcements but I think Sancho being a generational talent does justify having to spend an impractical amount despite the current pandemics’ effect. As well as despite the fact that it’ll be at a cost of foregoing other acquisitions. Sacrifices will have to be made somewhere. Should it be quality over quantity or vice versa?
We’d also again have to rely on our academy to provide reinforcements but not sure if the players I mentioned are ready to come into the fold right away. If they can be then that’s basically avoiding buying new players and redirecting those funds towards other obligations.
For instance Greenwood & Williams have literally helped avoid a sum equivalent to what a player of their caliber would’ve cost us in today’s market while also taking into consideration an ongoing pandemic. Mind-boggling! But a blessing no doubt.
Exactly.I’d much rather we spent our entire summer budget on Sancho than on Grealish and Gabriel. Both will Undoubtably improve the squad, but not the first 11 like Sancho would.
Thanks mate!Nice post.
Like you say, you have to have a balanced view. Irrespective of what people say about the Glazers, the pandemic has dismissed this notion of Glazers penny pinching and United being a cash cow. They have kept the business at the forefront of of world football business and has allowed us to be able to spend this year, unlike clubs such as Real and Barca. But not wanting to derail this thread...
Our academy will be a massive part of our plans. It will be another source of income for us, whilst potentially saving us big money every so often. What I mean is, I believe we are going down the Chelsea route of buying top young talent, giving them loan spell, with maybe a few first team games and then sell for profit. Then hopefully a few Mason's, Rashford's, Williams etc come through.
But going back to Sancho, he is that kind of player where we spend big and should be fine for about 3-5 years.
Thanks mate!
Actually longer than 3-5 years in my opinion.
Ahahaha fair enoughI was just being you...pessimistic about 3-5 years!
But yea, if successful and not then wanting to agitate for a move, he would be here for longer.
Reminds me of when Fergie pinpointed Van Persie as exactly what we needed. Solskjaer and his staff think Sancho is critical. Hope we can swing it.
Ole pressuring the board to spend? it's so on
well you seem keen to tell me my problemsWhy would i need any? No idea what the feck you're on about.
Impressed Ole is putting some pressure on the board. About feckin time.
Why do some people think today is the day? I'm assuming I've missed something when skimming through the thread.
Impressed Ole is putting some pressure on the board. About feckin time.
Not sure it works that way. Players negotiate on their annual salary. The per week rate is something the fans and media dwell on because players might get paid weekly. So if we negotiate an annual wage of £11m. Sancho will get that regardless if he’s signed today or next month.Think about it this way; if we’re £10m apart in the negotiations, Woody/Judge will save 10% of that in 4 weeks of delaying by not paying his wages.
A few weeks of Alexis being off the books on top of that and we’re there.
Not sure it works that way. Players negotiate on their annual salary. The per week rate is something the fans and media dwell on because players might get paid weekly. So if we negotiate an annual wage of £11m. Sancho will get that regardless if he’s signed today or next month.
Seems like an unbelievably weird fit for me. I'd guess Thiago's agent is trying to smoke out a buyer or get an improved contract from Bayern. But maybe there's a lot I don't know about due to not caring and his transfer to Liverpool is obviously happening.Woodward better delivers. Pool is running away now with Thiago in their ranks as well
I like the idea that Ole learns about our transfer targets via links in the media.Do ye think that quite from Ole is him starting to panic a little bit with the total lack of progress or even serious links to players yet?
I like the idea that Ole learns about our transfer targets via links in the media.
I like the idea that Ole learns about our transfer targets via links in the media.
I mean that the lack of links is a symptom of the fact that we aren’t actually close to signing anyone and Ole is telling them to get a move on
I don't think that's necessarily true, silence is usually good news as it's indicative of negotiations. There was hardly any noise when we signed Lukaku despite all the surrounding news on Moratta. Bruno was relatively left field. The lack of media from our briefs and more recently Dortmund's is positive.
Any deal he (or any player) signs will be up to 30 June 202X, if we signed him 2 weeks ago verses 2 weeks in the future then overall we’d pay him 4 weeks less in wages.
To be fair my initial post on this subject was entirely facetious but I very much doubt either party would get bogged down in that level of detail on the timing. It’ll be a headline weekly figure with a load of bonus clauses, they’re not going to get into pro-rating for him joining “late”, and neither will Ed be putting things off to save a few weeks wages.But if he really cares about it, he can negotiate a total package that would compensate for the difference in wage during these 4 weeks, I'm not sure if the sum is that important but it can be done, of course the club could refuse but the sum is negligeable for both sides. People focus a little bit too much on the weekly wages and tabloid figures.
Wait a minute! Are you saying we are like Arsenal?I won't say he is a Glazer patsy. But he definitely is their choice of manager.
For Glazers a manager who keeps the fans content while doing the minimum possible is the ideal scenario. In this case if Ole gets comfortable top 4 next year with no title challenge, most fans will be happy and want Ole to continue. If they had gotten the likes of Pochettino, Tuchel or Nagelsmann nothing short of a title challenge would have done for the fans.
Glazers don't care what the manager says about them, they just want fans tuning in and spending whilst they spend the minimum possible of their money. Ole is perfect for them.
I like the idea that Ole learns about our transfer targets via links in the media.
Yeah that was a confusing post by peridigm. Of course it matters when the contract is concluded, even if it is an annual “salary”. Pro rate/accrual, all that.Any deal he (or any player) signs will be up to 30 June 202X, if we signed him 2 weeks ago verses 2 weeks in the future then overall we’d pay him 4 weeks less in wages.
Ole pressuring the board to spend? it's so on