Hi King7Eric, thanks for putting the time in to formulate your thoughts in more detail. I hope you are fine with me disagreeing on a few aspects.
I think your first paragraph might be the worst right at the start in my eyes. Maybe as a fan of one of the richest clubs in the world it is not a reality you are aware of but barring maybe 10 clubs in the world every single club in professional football has to sell their best players eventually because they aspire to play for and with the best. I would hope we can all agree on this. Dortmund are one of the clubs that have to deal with this reality and yes, they have to sell players because they want to move on to richer or more successful clubs eventually. That does however not mean that the club has no ambitions. This might actually be the point people take offense with here the most, me included. It's like telling United fans to shut up because they might be happy to have qualified for the CL this year and tell them that they did not even win the title so why even bother. Every club has some kind of ambition and for that they of course need the best players available. For Dortmund this means a balancing act of keeping players to remain competitive and sell them if it is the fiscally responsible thing to do.
The second thing you say here is that Sancho staying or leaving does not change the ambitions. That is very much not true, he is a fantastic player and of course he elevates the level of Dortmund's attack. They might not win the title next season either, it is far more likely Bayern will have it again. But I am sure they nevertheless want to try take the fight to them again and for that the chances are very much improved if Sancho stays. So no, Dortmund are not "perfectly happy where they are", but they are also not delusional. They aspire to improve and keeping Sancho would in the short run help than more than selling him. As a short aside I am pretty sure that they would only agree to selling him for a specific fee because that is what they agreed on with the Sancho camp.
This basically only reflects the situation considering the vastly different financial prerequisites these two clubs have. Also these transfers basically all need to be evaluated on a case by case basis as the financial situation in Dortmund changed quite drastically in the timespan that they too place in. So yes, Dortmund have had and will for the foreseeable future need to sell players when they want to leave the club and it is financially compensated. That still does not mean that it is fun to be called a feeder club by opposition fans as it is quite obviously used as a derogatory term. The implication is that there is no ambition which in my opinion is not true as I explained before.
This is basically the same argument, so I will make it short, keeping Sancho helps Dortmund pursue their sporting goals in the short term and increases their chances for a miracle result. That is what sports teams should strive for in my opinion.
So I think I made clear that we are not in agreement on this, I hope you can see my side or the side of the club a little better. I do not thing Dortmund are posturing to drag the saga, they are posturing to keep their player.
No worries mate. Its a forum so we are here to disagree.
I will start with your last point. You say Dortmund are posturing to keep the player. If that was the case then why not simply state it clearly that he will not be sold. Why come up with this hypothetical deadline and a price? The very fact that they did means they are open to selling him.
Yes, I agree that barring a handful, all clubs have to sell their best players, but then that is the point, they do not pretend to be above selling their best players which BVB are doing here (or at least their fans are by claiming they are not a feeder club to the elite). If somebody offered us 200 million for our best player, and that player doesn't wanna go, Utd would reject that bid, because for Utd trophies would be more valuable than that 200 million. BVB would never do that because for them money is important. And this ties into the point regarding club ambitions. BVB are a well run club and sure they have ambitions of staying a top club, but they do not have the ambitions of being THE CLUB in Germany. Yes, this is of course related to their financial realities, which are different from a club like Bayern or Utd, but the point remains that they are not as ambitious as these clubs.
Southampton are widely referred to as the feeder club for Liverpool, which is unfair, but not totally untrue. Soton would accept that as long as they can maintain their PL status with the odd run in Europe and get big fees for their top players, they will be more than happy. That is the extent of their ambitions and they would accept it. BVB fans don't seem to accept the extent of their club's ambitions despite repeated evidence for the same.
And lastly, I do not agree that selling Sancho will see a massive drop in BVB's league position. The likes of Reus, Brandt, Haaland, Hazard etc coupled with a solid defense are more than good enough to get top 4 in the Bundesliga. Similarly, even keeping Sancho I don't see them really winning the league because more than quality, BVB lack the winning mentality that Bayern have in spades.