Can you explain why? Are you mad at BVB because they don't want to sell their best player to the holy United? Can you then just sell Pogba for €40m to Juve or Real, please? Or should Real now say "well they did not sell their best player to us, we don't make a deal with them ever again"? And I am not even mentioning De Gea->Real.
First you guys belittle BVB as a selling and feeder club. Then, when you realize that they don't want to sell, you get mad. This is somehow really funny.
Here's the thing mate and I had tried framing it to some other Dortmund fan on here as well who got set off with it. I think we can all agree on the following-
1. With or without Sancho, BVB are not likely to win the league. They will finish in a CL qualification spot and in the CL they'll reach the RO16 or QF. Of course, anything can happen in football but these would be there realistic ambitions for this coming season. Keeping Sancho or letting him go does not change those ambitions. Keeping or letting go Pogba does affect Utd's ambitions. With him we can probably aim higher than we would without him. Utd are not happy with our current standing in the game, whereas BVB seem perfectly happy where they are as evidenced by their constantly selling their biggest players. If you really have ambitions of winning trophies regularly, you don't let go of your best players irrespective of the price.
2. In the last 20 years, Ronaldo and DDG are the only 2 players whom Man Utd wanted to keep, but yet agreed to sell. SAF wanted to sell the likes of Beckham and RVN and well wanted to get rid of ADM. BVB on the other hand constantly sell their top players, whatever be the reason. The likes of Sahin, Hummels, Gotze, Kagawa, Mkhi, Aubameyang, Dembele, all these are of the top of my head. They constantly act as a feeder club for the top clubs of Europe, so why get offended when someone calls them that?
3. Even if they keep Sancho for a year, he is not going to spend his entire career at BVB. He may leave next year but he will go for sure. Now given that its likely his value will go down given he will have a year less on his contract and his staying for a year is unlikely to lead to BVB winning the league or CL (of course they could surprise us but we'll all agree it will be a major shock), it leads people to question what is the point of keeping him here? Why not reduce your demands a little bit? So that you get your money and buy a replacement and carry on with your model of grooming and selling players while staying the 2nd best team in Germany.
It is these 3 points that make Utd fans feel that BVB are just drawing out this saga unnecessarily in a move that benefits no one. If its Villa acting like this with Grealish, then I could understand because Grealish staying or leaving is likely to be the difference between Villa staying up or getting relegated so you can understand why they would stick to their demands. Sancho staying or leaving isn't likely to change BVB's standing so it all seems like unnecessary posturing.