Everybody has to consider £100m mate, maybe apart from the Oil clubs.People talk as if £100m is too much for Sancho, but why would Dortmund consider anything less? Why would they even consider £100m? It's not like they need the money.
Everybody has to consider £100m mate, maybe apart from the Oil clubs.People talk as if £100m is too much for Sancho, but why would Dortmund consider anything less? Why would they even consider £100m? It's not like they need the money.
Eden or Dukes?
Just to add to this, Real payed what 60 million on two teenagers from the Brazilian league?
This guy is much more of a sure bet, he was seen as a big talent since his academy days and has performed exceptionally well in the Bundesliga.
This thread will be at 150+ by the end of August as nothing remotely happens but each tabloid builds it up for the summer.
Come September 1 he’s still at Dortmund
Who’s with me?
Its not my money you are right, but how much is Ole going to get to strengthen the team? £150 mill? £200 mill? Seems a lot to spunk on a prospect with very little left to get in a CD RB which we also need as a minimum.
I have never rated Ross Barkley and Januzaj wasn't as highly rated as Sancho in the youth team. He also didn't put up similar numbers in the first team, though I accept that I thought Januzaj was going to make it.No. The point is people get carried away and make up fantasies about how a player is definitely going to improve each season because they are "class" and never figure in loss of form, injuries and other problems that mean he might not get better. He might get worse.
A few years ago we had Januzaj who people were saying was going to be world class. He had a good first season where he was a bright spot in a dissappointing campaign. And then he struggled to do the same thing again.
A few years before that Ross Barkley was the sure fire player we should definitely sign because he was young and looked good for his age and he's English. Now he's lucky to get a start for England instead of being the star.
It happens all the time.
A young player breaking through and then improving at the rate the fans talk about is far more rare to talk about. So you're probably going to have several duds before you get it right.
I have never rated Ross Barkley and Januzaj wasn't as highly rated as Sancho in the youth team. He also didn't put up similar numbers in the first team, though I accept that I thought Januzaj was going to make it.
Not sure what you are suggesting as an alternative though... wait until his price goes up then buy him, despite the fact we need a right winger now and he might not be available next season? Buy a 'sure thing' but less talented player? Spend 300MIL on Mbappe? Or go back in time and poach Sancho from his academy at 15?
Just because not all youth players progress to the predicted level, doesn't mean you avoid signing them. Particularly ones who have excelled throughout their youth levels. The youngsters who burst onto the scene from nowhere with a goal like Macheda or Januzaj are less likely to make it.
Simple. Have a limit.
If we're apparently trying to buy him for £70-80 million then great. If Dortmund ask for more, we're out. There are plenty of other good young players who for all we know might play better than he does next season. And any actual right winger with talent who has played well this season is likely to improve our team because thats something we don't have.
I know this place. If we sign Sancho for over £100 million and next season Hudson-Odoi or some other flavour of the season player has a better season than him, suddenly there will be questions of why we didnt buy that player instead of Sancho. And complaints that now they'll cost £150-200 million because we messed up and didnt get them sooner.
So yes, he might be just as good next season but the complaints will never stop regardless. They'll just be transfered
But that's also why you/ the club should just focus what they want/need. Which to be fair is what they do anyway.
So for me Sancho is the real deal. So if I were making the decision I would go for it at 100m. Depending on budget even upto 150m.
Cuz as you say there will be people complaining about something or the other anyway.
I mentioned talent, as in an ability beyond and Sancho isn’t even close to the ability of Dembele and arguably Dembele is technically more advanced with a ball than Mbappe and probably more so than Rooney so does the name fit in that list talking about talent, then yes.He is fantastic. Aren't you also by mentioning those players in the same breath? Dembele isn't even close to the likes of Rooney, Messi and Mbappe as well.
You're saying he isn't close to the technical ability as Dembele only because Dembele is two footed.I mentioned talent, as in an ability beyond and Sancho isn’t even close to the ability of Dembele and arguably Dembele is technically more advanced with a ball than Mbappe and probably more so than Rooney so does the name fit in that list talking about talent, then yes.
Really not the best indicator. You could say the same about Rooney when he was awful outside of his end product. Fact is, Sanchez having a down season was a common sentiment amongst Arsenal supporters.He was statistically the 15th best player in the league before he signed for us, which is 4 places behind Eriksen, 3 ahead of Mahrez and 5 ahead of Mane
So no he wasn't playing poorly before we signed him.
Januzaj didn't burst onto the scene due to a goal. He was fantastic at youth level and his performances as a first teamer that year was more so a case of "of course he did that" due to his talent. Nothing like Macheda.I have never rated Ross Barkley and Januzaj wasn't as highly rated as Sancho in the youth team. He also didn't put up similar numbers in the first team, though I accept that I thought Januzaj was going to make it.
Not sure what you are suggesting as an alternative though... wait until his price goes up then buy him, despite the fact we need a right winger now and he might not be available next season? Buy a 'sure thing' but less talented player? Spend 300MIL on Mbappe? Or go back in time and poach Sancho from his academy at 15?
Just because not all youth players progress to the predicted level, doesn't mean you avoid signing them. Particularly ones who have excelled throughout their youth levels. The youngsters who burst onto the scene from nowhere with a goal like Macheda or Januzaj are less likely to make it.
80m for Sancho would be great value in this market. We would paying that much for a player who could give us 15 years.
Yes that's fair, although Januzaj did score 2 goals on his debut which probably increased the hype.Januzaj didn't burst onto the scene due to a goal. He was fantastic at youth level and his performances as a first teamer that year was more so a case of "of course he did that" due to his talent. Nothing like Macheda.
However, Sancho did much more at first team level so Januzaj isn't a good comparison either.
More that his passing, shooting, dribbling, creativity, speed, ability to beat a man aren’t as good as well as the two footed-ness. That’s just my opinion from watching them both though come through.You're saying he isn't close to the technical ability as Dembele only because Dembele is two footed.
Really not the best indicator. You could say the same about Rooney when he was awful outside of his end product. Fact is, Sanchez having a down season was a common sentiment amongst Arsenal supporters.
Where does this 80mil figure come from? Dortmund just sold Pulisic, who is all hype and no substance, for 60m with basically 12 months left on his contract. Why would Sancho be on the market for 80m this summer, when he has a contract until 2022? Their plan will be to keep him until his contract forces their hand, meaning the summer of 2021.
There are a few reasons why Dortmund might be convinced to sell at around 80-100, perhaps 120 max with the clauses. 1.) anything can happen in a year, the kid could suffer a serious injury and might never be worth that again. 2.) with that money, they can spend half of it on CHO for a direct replacement thats potentially even better, and still have plenty left over to strengthe other areas. and 3.) while Sanchos been fantastic for them and won them many points, I dont think he is Neymar level just yet, meaning he like everyone else is still expendable and replaceable. 100M is the figure being quoted by most media atm, and its a really good price for a teenager who hasnt even finished his first full season as a pro, and just starting to break into the NT.It's bollocks. Think some amount will go to City as well, so we are likely talking about Pogba figures and above.
There are a few reasons why Dortmund might be convinced to sell at around 80-100, perhaps 120 max with the clauses. 1.) anything can happen in a year, the kid could suffer a serious injury and might never be worth that again. 2.) with that money, they can spend half of it on CHO for a direct replacement thats potentially even better, and still have plenty left over to strengthe other areas. and 3.) while Sanchos been fantastic for them and won them many points, I dont think he is Neymar level just yet, meaning he like everyone else is still expendable and replaceable. 100M is the figure being quoted by most media atm, and its a really good price for a teenager who hasnt even finished his first full season as a pro, and just starting to break into the NT.
Where does this 80mil figure come from? Dortmund just sold Pulisic, who is all hype and no substance, for 60m with basically 12 months left on his contract. Why would Sancho be on the market for 80m this summer, when he has a contract until 2022? Their plan will be to keep him until his contract forces their hand, meaning the summer of 2021.
Think the views debated in this thread might be summed up roughly as follows:
1. He is talented but not all that, signing him for 80m would be a big risk.
2. He is a top talent and we'd do well to sign him for 80-100m.
3. He is an exceptional talent (think Neymar, Mbappe) and we should sign him even if it would cost us 130-150m.
I'm with 2. But I don't think Dortmund will sell him, unless we offer well in excess of 100m.
Dortmund will sell.
They will sell for 78m. I have forseen it.
But why would we even be in the top 3 best suitors for him if they do from his perspective? I mean he would have the top clubs in Europe right now after him right? Him being so good.
Same reason he left City I guess - playing time. He’d get that here without a doubt, as well as the sort of salary you’d expect from an elite club. It’s the best of both worlds really.But why would we even be in the top 3 best suitors for him if they do from his perspective? I mean he would have the top clubs in Europe right now after him right? Him being so good.
They are a selling club and thats a lot of fecking money. They cant turn anything in that range down imo.
I totally agree with this. He was okay at Wembley, but there was nothing Wow! about him.Average to good performance.
A lot of overrating here because of him being a player many fans want.
Tbf he’s 18 years old and playing for England. He’s allowed to be inconsistent every now and again.Average to good performance.
A lot of overrating here because of him being a player many fans want.
Rashford just followed him on Twitter.
Rashford just followed him on Twitter.
So he’s having a medical at Carrington?Rashford just followed him on Twitter.
When you consider Ajax are about to sell De Jong and De Ligt (arguably bigger talents than Sancho) for a combined fee of under £150 million then approximately £80 million seems to be the going rate for a top tier talent. I think the Mbappe transfer has skewed perceptions and is an anomaly.Where does this 80mil figure come from? Dortmund just sold Pulisic, who is all hype and no substance, for 60m with basically 12 months left on his contract. Why would Sancho be on the market for 80m this summer, when he has a contract until 2022? Their plan will be to keep him until his contract forces their hand, meaning the summer of 2021.
When you consider Ajax are about to sell De Jong and De Ligt (arguably bigger talents than Sancho) for a combined fee of under £150 million then approximately £80 million seems to be the going rate for a top tier talent. I think the Mbappe transfer has skewed perceptions and is an anomaly.