onemanarmy
Full Member
If you think he's that good, why didn't we sign him instead? Don't think he's that good to get anywhere near Reus & Sancho numbers.
At least he has similar goals + assists over the past couple of years as Reus.
If you think he's that good, why didn't we sign him instead? Don't think he's that good to get anywhere near Reus & Sancho numbers.
Big fan of astrology as well, are we?I'm sorry but this is complete nonsense. I would recommend you take the time to read all the posts (they don't delete anything) and cross-check the info with the times journalists were posting similar info. If you aren't willing to do that then don't make such bold and bullshit claims and waste our time. They have consistently beaten journalists to several pieces of information on a variety of topics.
I've followed the subreddit both last summer when it was a complete shit show till now. The difference is night and day and you would be scarily surprised at the reliability if you took the time to look into it. There is a reason why Goldbridge is copying all of their info now.
Rock solid argue this. Acknowledges a lot of journalists are talking shit, compare them to ITKs and use them as an example of why we should take ITKs seriously. Erm...Like 90% of all sports journalists then.
I mean, the amount of fake reporting getting 20+pages on the transfer forum here ...
But if "ITK"''s are not allowed on this forum its not allowed
And that’s exactly my point. I’ve stated something that the Athletic have repeatedly said is a none starter and United’s name have been used to try and make Madrid panic and pay the money they were supposed to pay this summer. That’s not me saying that, that’s people who’s reputations and jobs are on the line, and also have a direct line with most people at Old Trafford.Spoken with the confidence of an ITK.
Rock solid argue this. Acknowledges a lot of journalists are talking shit, compare them to ITKs and use them as an example of why we should take ITKs seriously. Erm...
Relax mate. I don't care whether any ITK or journalist is right or not. I take info reported by both as just fun and games. The simple truth is no one apart from the club officials really know what's gonna happen, but waiting for only official information is highly boring. So it's fun to keep yourself up to date with all these rumours.And that’s exactly my point. I’ve stated something that the Athletic have repeatedly said is a none starter and United’s name have been used to try and make Madrid panic and pay the money they were supposed to pay this summer. That’s not me saying that, that’s people who’s reputations and jobs are on the line, and also have a direct line with most people at Old Trafford.
But instead I’m having to defend the validity of something that would be common knowledge if some random pleb on the internet didn’t say “it’s a done deal” and people didn’t want to believe it.
Believe whatever you want to believe I’m only repeating what people who are confirmed as well connected are saying.
For me this is more a Magurie situation. In that 1) For a cheaper valuation others would be interested, but they aren't so we have an open run. 2) He seems set on coming to us. 3) The personal terms were reported to be agreed already. 4) He's keeping relatively professional, not making public remarks like a twat, but making it known internally to the right channels that it's time to move on.Idk but for some reason I am getting Griezmann vibes out of this. Everything looks like going too smoothly.
They are as reliable as the journalists because they base all their made up ITK nonsense on the back of the journalist's published stories (which may also be made up in the first place). Just in their own words with added figures, 'clauses' and deadlines.My point is that in my eyes at least, these reddit/muppetiers ITK's are just as "reliable" as 90% of the journalists out there.
Hell, many of the journalists in question (Mitten, Whitwell etc., all the tier 2-3's) probably use their own ITK's as a basis on some of their rumours, or even that reddit group.
And therefore it is a weird argument that we can speculate and discuss the journalist info/rumours, but not the ITK's.
As someone said before me , you can check the reliability of those ITK's when you look at last year rumours on Maguire, AWB, and Fernandes.
The sub mods have stated they have figures etc for the Sancho deal, theyre keeping it under wraps until it breaks in the media.They are as reliable as the journalists because they base all their made up ITK nonsense on the back of the journalist's published stories (which may also be made up in the first place). Just in their own words with added figures, 'clauses' and deadlines.
Why do these ITKs never break a new transfer story that everyone isn't already talking about?
The sub mods have stated they have figures etc for the Sancho deal, theyre keeping it under wraps until it breaks in the media.
How anybody believes that childish nonsense is beyond me
Are they feck!My point is that in my eyes at least, these reddit/muppetiers ITK's are just as "reliable" as 90% of the journalists out there.
I'm sorry but this is complete nonsense. I would recommend you take the time to read all the posts (they don't delete anything) and cross-check the info with the times journalists were posting similar info. If you aren't willing to do that then don't make such bold and bullshit claims and waste our time. They have consistently beaten journalists to several pieces of information on a variety of topics.
I've followed the subreddit both last summer when it was a complete shit show till now. The difference is night and day and you would be scarily surprised at the reliability if you took the time to look into it. There is a reason why Goldbridge is copying all of their info now.
One of them, ITK 4 is a lawyer with one of the Bundesliga clubs and hence gets a lot of the info regarding Bundesliga stuff correct. He's gone on record saying he only shares info that is at least a couple of weeks old and certainly doesn't share info regarding any deals he's actively involved in. He's gotten a lot of smaller stuff right, which isn't reported anywhere, the Caliguiri transfer to Augsburg being one example. I don't know about the others but this guy's info is usually spot on.
But of course, any reasonable adult will know that all this info is supposed to be taken with a pinch of salt and its all just fun. If someone is gonna start analyzing everything and ask for 100% accuracy, then the joke's on that person.
Yeah that’s the UWS podcast, Mitten is generally pretty good but don’t expect much transfer talk on that one, he has very good insights though and says a lot about what’s going on behind the scenes.
Others are:
Talk of the Devils
Ornstein and Chapman
Not sure if anyone else has anything they’d like to add?
The sub mods have stated they have figures etc for the Sancho deal, theyre keeping it under wraps until it breaks in the media.
How anybody believes that childish nonsense is beyond me
They're still a bit scattergun but it's definitely greatly improved. The majority of the blowback here on the caf is people who haven't gone there and read through or seen them over the past few weeks consistently several days ahead of the 'top journos'.
Crossy at least is alleging that they're just pilfering their info from the UWS podcast.
I agree. When I post those updates here it's with tongue firmly in cheek.
That being said, #4 seems to have gotten so many things right that his/her word is beyond doubt. (For the record, that person's on record saying Grealish to us is done.)
I listen to the bolded guys fairly regularly. Never heard them talk about any of the issues that the muppetiers nailed during the corresponding time frames.
When you get a chance, could you please provide any one of the UWS podcasts where they talked about either Sanchez to Inter permanently, Sancho negotiations finally underway, or vdB to Madrid breaking down about five to ten days before anyone else? Again, I'm not asking for all of them, just one.
Nahh the Sancho thread is always going to go off topic. Even turned to an Awb vs Arnold thread at some pointAny chance we can move on from the Itk chat?
Talk of the Devils is Mitten and Whitwell, they do a lot of transfer talk and Mitten said at the start of the season that Sanchez wouldn't play for United again and discussed a bust up between Greenwood and Sanchez in training as the cause of him being moved on. He's also adamant that Sanchez won't be coming back from what he's been told. I'm not going to go back through and find it but I would encourage people to listen to that particular podcast if they want transfer scoops on a regular basis.They're still a bit scattergun but it's definitely greatly improved. The majority of the blowback here on the caf is people who haven't gone there and read through or seen them over the past few weeks consistently several days ahead of the 'top journos'.
Crossy at least is alleging that they're just pilfering their info from the UWS podcast.
I agree. When I post those updates here it's with tongue firmly in cheek.
That being said, #4 seems to have gotten so many things right that his/her word is beyond doubt. (For the record, that person's on record saying Grealish to us is done.)
I listen to the bolded guys fairly regularly. Never heard them talk about any of the issues that the muppetiers nailed during the corresponding time frames.
When you get a chance, could you please provide any one of the UWS podcasts where they talked about either Sanchez to Inter permanently, Sancho negotiations finally underway, or vdB to Madrid breaking down about five to ten days before anyone else? Again, I'm not asking for all of them, just one.
Because typically mods on this forum haven’t allowed it and we were just okay without it.I don't know why you are so snobby about info posted on Reddit mate. There are only a handful of journalists who have actually proven to be reliable, so by that logic the whole Transfer Forum should not exist, because it is built on rumors, 90% of which don't pan out. If you only want reliable news from a major news outlet, then you have to wait for BBC to report it.
Yes I recall we had a thread where people could talk ITK chat. That worked in my view as the whole thread was taken with a massive pinch of salt and nobody give a feck about it. Leave official threads to the guys who put their necks on the line day in day out.Any chance we can move on from the Itk chat?
As someone said before me , you can check the reliability of those ITK's when you look at last year rumours on Maguire, AWB, and Fernandes.
Fair enough and I'm sorry if it was out of turn posting about ITKs. Someone had been asking about the credibility of the Muppetiers info and I had replied initially to that post, that at least one guy's info has been pretty spot on. But I won't mention that anymore.Because typically mods on this forum haven’t allowed it and we were just okay without it.
Yes I tend to agree - however! Exactly the same can be levelled at the bullsh*t journo's who literally make stuff up equally as much as these ITK's.This is the problem. They were all exposed as bullshitters last year we even had a brilliant thread on it. So don’t be coming in here and telling us how reliable they are based on last season’s rubbish.
This is exactly how clairvoyants work, trick people into thinking what they get wrong actually validates their predictions.
And by the way it isn’t fecking ‘fun’, it’s pathetic.
I don’t get the arrogance over the Sancho deal. We’ve been here so many times over the past few years. Most recently , Haaland.
Yes I tend to agree - however! Exactly the same can be levelled at the bullsh*t journo's who literally make stuff up equally as much as these ITK's.
Therefore realistically speaking if we can accept one bunch of liars why can't we accept another bunch of liars? Just because one bunch have a blue tick on their twitter name?
I'd throw the lot into the mix, it all has to be taken with a pinch of salt anyway.
I think the good thing is we now have good players all around midfield and attack in the starting 11 and his style of play really shines when surrounded by good players that link up play which we have now. At worst he wouldn't be dribbling past 2-3 players with ease but would still contribute with good link up playAnyone else worried Sancho will struggle to perform or under-perform once we get him?
1. He will definitely be expensive. Seeing how Maguire and previously Pogba being lambasted with constant reference to their transfer prices... not just that, even the cheaper transfers eg. AWB and way cheaper James.
2. Sancho definitely have top reputations. Combine with #1 and therefore... high transfer money + reputations = ridiculous over-the-top expectations. Best similar case would be Pogba. Fans are split in the case of Pogba after seeing him perform in our shirt.
3. United fans already have ridiculous high expectations of Sancho.
4. Knowing how very patience the supporters are, and especially here at caf, very merciful and understanding when it comes to new players and especially young players
5. Any new players still need to adapt. If EPL proven, then advantage, but not always eg. Sanchez. Not just adapting to the league, but need to also adapt to different team and our tactics. Dortmund and us doesn't have the exact same system so Sancho will need to adapt and get used to ours first. In theory, he would fit right in, but that's just theory. Also need to develop chemistry with new teammates. It's not 100% success.
6. Expected inconsistencies, mistakes, off form and poor performances now and then. He is still a young player and even top player and world's best players have their off games.
While i agree with the general sentiment that you should not take everything you read on the internet seriously. They have actually already written out the figures that one of the ITK have given them (i think a week ago, something like 80 million punds + somewhat easy extras to get to 100). So while you should definately be suspicious you should also try to look into things before you say stuff.
We don’t, though. There are loads of banned sources on this very forum in order to try and keep standards high.
People coming in here like ‘muppetiers’ are real credible people.
It’s very childish.
I think the good thing is we now have good players all around midfield and attack in the starting 11 and his style of play really shines when surrounded by good players that link up play which we have now. At worst he wouldn't be dribbling past 2-3 players with ease but would still contribute with good link up play
Yeah listen I understand the want to keep the sources credible but if that's the case then we should ban every source other than what 3 journo's? And let's be honest even those reliable few only confirm things once transfers are more or less totally done and dusted more often than not.We don’t, though. There are loads of banned sources on this very forum in order to try and keep standards high.
People coming in here like ‘muppetiers’ are real credible people.
It’s very childish.
Great analysis and thanks for sharing. It makes perfect sense and is one of a few reasons why ext season is also unlikely to lead to a sustained title challenge (which I'm also OK with). I agree that familiarity will lead to his successful adjustment, and we'll see really special things from 2021/22.I posted these statistics a while back to showcase how Sancho might grow.
per 90 (successful/attempted/%successful)
Sancho age 18: 4.1/6.8 / 60.3%
Sancho age 19: 3.0 /5.4 / 55.6%
Hazard age 19: 2.0 /5.3 / 37.7%
Hazard age 20: 2.9 /6 / 48.3%
Hazard age 21: 2.5 /4.9 / 51%
Hazard age 22: 2.1 /4.4 / 47.7% (Premier League)
Hazard age 23: 4.1 /6.5 / 63.1% (Premier League)
Sane age 19: 3.3 /6.8 / 48.5%
Sane age 20: 3.5 /7.7 / 45.5%
Sage age 21: 2.7 /4.8 / 56.3% (PL)
Sane age 22: 3.2 /4.9 / 65.3% (PL)
I noted the players at similar ages, and used per 90 min statistics as I didn't want Sancho to have an unfair advantage that benefits the player that has more time per game to rack up successful dribbles.
As you can see, each player had a year of adjustment in their first season in the PL. Their 2nd season in the PL started to show off similar or better dribbling statistics compared to their teenage years in the "less competitive" league. Going off these statistics, it shows that Sancho was the better dribbler in their teenage years.
So seeing as Sancho is about to have his age 20 season next year, we could be looking at something special in terms of disrupting defenses or causing fear in defenses.