RedRonaldo
Wishes to be oppressed.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 18,996
Just offload Lukaku and Sanchez, offer something they can’t refuse, starting from 100m bid
Mkhitaryan was the second player signed from Dortmund.No, I honestly dont know whos is the second dortmund player is that failed in United. Maybe Januzaj?
I keep saying that that is just not true. He was our key player in Europa league. It is a big thing. I am not saying that he was great buy or something like that, but he was decent signing because of all those crucial goals in EL. We won trophy and returned in CL mostly because of him.Mkhitaryan was a pretty bad signing.
I keep saying that that is just not true. He was our key player in Europa league. It is a big thing. I am not saying that he was great buy or something like that, but he was decent signing because of all those crucial goals in EL. We won trophy and returned in CL mostly because of him.
In PL he was bad, not arguing that.
I disagree. Sancho has better output in the same amount of games according to transfermarkt, whilst being about 4 years younger too.
I keep saying that that is just not true. He was our key player in Europa league. It is a big thing. I am not saying that he was great buy or something like that, but he was decent signing because of all those crucial goals in EL. We won trophy and returned in CL mostly because of him.
In PL he was bad, not arguing that.
Doesn't mattered it doesn't t have Mbappe. We should focus on ensuring we get Sancho. He's at a club we are financial stronger and he's English. He's also seemingly a natural on the right. For the central position hopefully Rashford and Greenwood develop well.Only way that Mbappe joins that list is if we are taken over by the super rich owners and I don't mean the Red Knights
Yeah, right. They just signed Kevin Prince Boateng who started on the weekend, and Sancho wouldn't even make the bench.Stats, stats, stats... if Sancho played for Barcelona and France, he wouldn't be good enough to be on the bench !
Dembele isn't even 3 years older btw.
Stats, stats, stats... if Sancho played for Barcelona and France, he wouldn't be good enough to be on the bench !
Dembele isn't even 3 years older btw.
M'Bappe will look reasonable at 166m
if this kids the real deal I'd pay what it takes
You're hilarious. What is it you've got against him?Stats, stats, stats... if Sancho played for Barcelona and France, he wouldn't be good enough to be on the bench !
Dembele isn't even 3 years older btw.
Posts like this are so weird and pointless. Why shouldn't it happen? How do you know we don't want him and he doesn't want us? You don't.Not gonna happen..
Sorry I’ll expand; won’t happen, shouldn’t happen, we don’t want him, he doesn’t want us.
So that’s that then, let’s move on chaps
Didnt his contract run out?Interesting to see that City have both sale percentage and first refusal clauses inserted in the original deal.
Neil Custis is gonna be on Phil Brown's show tomorrow after the Chelsea game. I'm sure he will shed more light on his Jadon Sancho piece from afew days earlier.
You're hilarious. What is it you've got against him?
If he was purely just a stats player, why is he in the England team already? Why don't other "average" players put up the same stats?.
He's playing in an attack with 2 world cup winning forwards and keeping a £60m player on the bench in Pulisic. You may not like his style but he's clearly class. What other players at his age are one of the best in the league?
Posts like this are so weird and pointless. Why shouldn't it happen? How do you know we don't want him and he doesn't want us? You don't.
But Sancho has great technique too. So what is it about Sancho that doesn't make him in the same class of prospect? I don't understand. For example, if it was Zaha, you could easily point to the gulf in technical class. You can't do that with Sancho.Stats, stats, stats... if Sancho played for Barcelona and France, he wouldn't be good enough to be on the bench !
Dembele isn't even 3 years older btw.
Even if you offer 150mio, he is not getable this summer. We already sell Pulisic, and have no reason to sell another winger. Especially when he just perform like we want and his value will steadily rise and rise.No way we get him for £70MIL. Why would Dortmund sell him for that when they know they can get much more? I doubt this will happen, but it would take at least £100MIL.
Would like to see what Greenwood or Chong can do before we go and spend silly money on Sancho, assuming we could even get him.
Even if you offer 150mio, he is not getable this summer. We already sell Pulisic, and have no reason to sell another winger. Especially when he just perform like we want and his value will steadily rise and rise.
Another note:
In his contract there is an option for City, to be immidiately informed about an offer, so that they have the possibility to beat this.
All in all: no Sancho in this summer, the earliest time is summer 2020, and then you will have a betting war with City...
I feel Dembele would've cost less, had it not been for PSG taking Neymar from Barca via his buy out clause. Barca from my understanding then tapped up Ousmane Dembele and turned his head which infuriated Watzke at Dortmund. I think Barca paid at least €20m in excess due to pissing Dortmund off.
United have had good dealings with Dortmund in the past when it comes to buying players. We signed Kagawa and Mkhitaryan for very reasonable fees. The Dortmund hierarchy even went on record to say they were very pleased to see how classy United were in how they went about signing Kagawa, which was a swipe at the Bayern board at the time.
I think we can negoiate a good price for both clubs but it will depend on what Sancho wants. We tried to sign him before when he was at City and we wouldn't have even made a attempt if the player didn't want to join.
70 million seems low, given Dembele went for 100 plus.
I think you stand pretty much alone with that opinion. 96/100 would probably say overall flop
Are you taking the mickey?
Even if you offer 150mio, he is not getable this summer. We already sell Pulisic, and have no reason to sell another winger. Especially when he just perform like we want and his value will steadily rise and rise.
Another note:
In his contract there is an option for City, to be immidiately informed about an offer, so that they have the possibility to beat this.
All in all: no Sancho in this summer, the earliest time is summer 2020, and then you will have a betting war with City...
Alexis is available....Even if you offer 150mio, he is not getable this summer. We already sell Pulisic, and have no reason to sell another winger. Especially when he just perform like we want and his value will steadily rise and rise.
First, this would be a dispicable try. Everyone in the world of football critised Barcelona for thatone (and their move was based on their own stupidness to let Neymar suprisingly go and not planning in the longterm). Second Watzke claimed after that case, that we will not tolerate any actions like this anymore, and given the contract situation, he would let Sancho sit in the stands. Third point: Your try wouldnt remove the clause City has got, so even if you offer huge amounts of money, City has all the oportnunities to offer more and would always be the first choice. To say the last: Sancho extended his contract in the begining of the season to 2022, i can only repeat myself on that one.If we turn his head and he pulls a Dembele, we will get him.
I am quite confident that we can turn his head this summer.
So you'd happily wait a few years then?
I don't see the fuss in Chong either tbh. It's all well and good giving youth a go but if they ain't got it they ain't got it.So you'd happily wait a few years then?