Amir
Full Member
Higher chance he'll go to United than City for the quoted price.
That's assuming we'll be in position that tempts him...
Higher chance he'll go to United than City for the quoted price.
Bringing through the cream of our academy first and foremost, we can't afford to let these players slip through the net.
I really hope you're right because he would be a perfect signing for us and probably the best attacking player we could realistically attract.
Chelsea have just signed Pulisic who plays the same position. So it would essentially be giving up on his development if they signed Sancho.I think Madrid are set on signing Mbappe with Bayern set on signing Sane, and unfortunately don't think either Mane or Salah will be leaving Liverpool, so I'd remove Madrid, Bayern and Liverpool and add Chelsea.
City easily have the funds but they've been crowing about how they won't pay over x amount for a single player, instead paying £50M for multiple players. Would they smash that on Sancho? Can't see him wanting to play in Ligue 1 so would rule out PSG.
Most important thing is qualifying for the Champions League. If we don't and Chelsea do, I can see him going there.
Ofcourse he had a choice. He didn't have to play Mount over Barkley, Tammy over Giroud, get rid of Luiz to make space for Tomori likewise Zappacosta for James and he certainly didn't have to bring on Billy Gilmour for his senior debut while defending a slender 1 goal lead.Lampard is bringing the academy because he has no choice. Alot of United fans seemed happy about that, but once we sold Lukaku and sent Sanchez on loan alot of fans have decided to use phrases pressure on 17 year old, not proven,, no experience.
Agreed, i also think Mbappe may be on the market as-well which will aid both our chances (for Sancho) as Barca and Madrid will be firmly pre occupied fighting over the Frenchman.Tbh he is probably one of the hottest RW in world football come next summer so I could see a bidding war.
Ofcourse he had a choice. He didn't have to play Mount over Barkley, Tammy over Giroud, get rid of Luiz to make space for Tomori likewise Zappacosta for James and he certainly didn't have to bring on Billy Gilmour for his senior debut while defending a slender 1 goal lead.
Are you trying to say Barkley will play less than Mount?
Tammy over Giroud because of the football they play - Giroud is no Higuain or something special
He didn't get along with Tomori
How many games with Zappacosta actually start last season?
He had Mount, and Tomori at Derby, he knows how they play an
Agreed, i also think Mbappe may be on the market as-well which will aid both our chances (for Sancho) as Barca and Madrid will be firmly pre occupied fighting over the Frenchman.
Clubs in Europe don't have the funds in the way that Premier League teams do
Which team can afford to spend the majority of their budget on one player? We need another 5 or 6 players and i can't see us spending so big on one player with that in mind. Maybe if we sell Pogba and sign a cheaper midfielder.
Forgot about Pulisic but still think they'll go for him. Pulisic transfer was partly done as they knew a transfer ban was coming and Pulisic was on the bench for Dortmund so a decent signing to make before the ban would be enforced.Chelsea have just signed Pulisic who plays the same position. So it would essentially be giving up on his development if they signed Sancho.
Yes absolutely Barkley will less than Mount, it was clear in his selection patterns in pre season Mason was ahead in the pecking order (Mount played with the first team boys while Ross played with the scratch side).I don't think any Prem team can afford Mbappe nor will he want to play in the prem, Madrid or Barca will be his destination IMO.
In respects to Sancho, champions league qualification is important, and I think Liverpool will be after him too.
Yes absolutely Barkley will less than Mount, it was clear in his selection patterns in pre season Mason was ahead in the pecking order (Mount played with the first team boys while Ross played with the scratch side).
Giroud has actually played well when called upon this season and a Jose/Conte type manager wouldn't have in a million years dropped him for Tammy.
Zappacosta didn't play much but the point is Lampard had the option to play safe for a second RB and chose not to.
Regarding Sancho I actually think we will both have the upper hand on Liverpool despite them being miles superior to both of us right now. They have such an immovable front three that any attacker with quality will think twice before going there.
We certainly could have had it not been for Edwards wage structure. Missing out on Zidane, Batistuta, Ronaldo etc certainly had nothing to do with appeal.Mate, we've never been able to attract top tier talent from abroad, they want to play for Madrid and Barcelona. Under Fergie, Veron was as exotic as it got and he wasn't a mitigated success. Our foundations have always been in buying the best of British and augmenting that with talent from the lesser leagues in Europe. Bayern do the exact same but with German players, Juventus used to do this with Italian players. It's a tried and tested method that's worked for us, this signing big European names is new for us in the last couple of years.
1). Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus
2). Manchester United, Bayern Munich
3). City, PSG, Liverpool, Chelsea have the money but for some reasons I rule them out.
I disagree completely. Real Madrid and Barca can often find the money to purchase these super expensive players, but they do need serious investment in their squads at this moment to be able to compete in the CL.
Bayern won't spend what is required, I just can't see them getting involved.
City have the strongest squad in Europe right now and are the one team that could, in theory, spend all next summers budget on one player. Why you have them in the lowest bracket is beyond me. PSG are always willing to push financial boundaries and could be in for him.
I'd say
1) City, PSG (will probably sell Neymar)
2) Real Madrid, Barcelona (if they sell Dembele),
3) Juventus (don't think he'll be interested), Manchester United (need serious investment throughout and financial results are getting worse), Liverpool (have good options in his position already)
4) Chelsea (also need serious investment throughout and spend less these days), Bayern Munich
1) When Sane can't get a guaranteed starting spot, Sancho won't get one either. That's the reason he left in the first place.I disagree completely. Real Madrid and Barca can often find the money to purchase these super expensive players, but they do need serious investment in their squads at this moment to be able to compete in the CL.
Bayern won't spend what is required, I just can't see them getting involved.
City have the strongest squad in Europe right now and are the one team that could, in theory, spend all next summers budget on one player. Why you have them in the lowest bracket is beyond me. PSG are always willing to push financial boundaries and could be in for him.
I'd say
1) City, PSG (will probably sell Neymar)
2) Real Madrid, Barcelona (if they sell Dembele),
3) Juventus (don't think he'll be interested), Manchester United (need serious investment throughout and financial results are getting worse), Liverpool (have good options in his position already)
4) Chelsea (also need serious investment throughout and spend less these days), Bayern Munich
Right now i think he is "United-bound", but as i said, i think he would choose Real, Barca or City if they really want him.
1) When Sane can't get a guaranteed starting spot, Sancho won't get one either. That's the reason he left in the first place.
He's not the type of player to chase only money. His priority appears to be playing time and self-development. PSG can't offer the latter.
2) Real are a graveyard for young players' aspirations. Barca have also fecked up with Coutinho and Dembele in recent seasons too. Sancho's style is similar enough to Dembele's for him to worry about fitting in at the Camp Nou.
3) No chance will Juve be on the radar. Liverpool don't need him. Their balance requires a false 9 and two wing-forwards. Sancho is neither and could upset the way they work together.
4) Abramovic doesn't care anymore. Bayern won't pay 9 figures.
Many United fans obviously don’t like what’s in the mirror at the moment, but this fear of Real Madrid makes little sense to me. All of this ‘if we start playing good football’ stuff, has anyone watched them lately? They are only ‘guaranteed CL football’ due to the league the play in, they aren’t much better than us at the moment, and Sancho isn’t fecking Mexican.
Again seems like people projecting names to protect their feelings. There has been no Real/Sancho report, they aren’t that good a side, and no real reason to think he’d prefer to play in Spain than England.
United would have no issues with CL football if we were in La Liga, don’t be fooled, Real aren’t all that, and I’d back City, Liverpool or Spurs to bear them if they meet in Europe this year.
That said you would need to be mental to turn down playing for Real Madrid for United and living in Madrid as opposed to Manchester
That said you would need to be mental to turn down playing for Real Madrid for United and living in Madrid as opposed to Manchester
Why do people keep predicting he’ll go back to City? They’ll never pay the fee Dortmund will want.
I dont know why 90% of the people in this thread are saying what they are. It's blatantly obvious 70% of the sides people keep saying will be in for Sancho wont be
They'll only be 3 clubs that would prioritise Sancho next summer - us, Chelsea and Bayern (though they'd realistically rather sign Sane and I only even include them due to their history of signing Dortmund's best players. I actually dont think they'll be in for him)
That's kinda where they're coming from.Can the we can't attract his ilk crowd please do one? According to close sources to the player he would already be ours if we had Cl.
Don't project your feelings on to Sancho.
That's kinda where they're coming from.
I dont know why 90% of the people in this thread are saying what they are. It's blatantly obvious 70% of the sides people keep saying will be in for Sancho wont be
They'll only be 3 clubs that would prioritise Sancho next summer - us, Chelsea and Bayern (though they'd realistically rather sign Sane and I only even include them due to their history of signing Dortmund's best players. I actually dont think they'll be in for him)