#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,651
Not sure about that as they genuinely want the money. Think they'd snap your arm off for that right now - they know Sancho DOES want to leave eventually and they're managing to keep him happy in the mean time.
He's obviously being respectful to them which is great, but I don't think he will sign a new contract and they'll lose more and more money every year.
What are we basing the idea that they genuinely want the money off of? The fact that they've sold at a profit before?
I don't want to sell my house but if someone paid me several times what I reckon its worth I'd be open to taking the money. Being willing to sell at a huge markup and wanting to sell are two very different things.
Maybe Dortmund have privately communicated that they want Sancho out? However, that does not seem to be the tone of reports from Germany.
There seems to be an assumption that Dortmund want to sell and, eventually, they'll cave and accept less than their asking price like Leverkussen did for Havertz. Maybe that's the case and they've just got the German press dancing to their tune to create the right mood for a massive fee. However, I've listen to people like Andy Mitten and Fabrizio Romano talk on this and neither of them seemed to think there was a financial hole that selling Sancho fills.
Yeah surely they would need time in order to get a replacement
Yeah and the closer we get to deadline day the harder it is to see that happening.
I'm unsure how United aren't paying the money still.
The reality is the following:
If Sancho doesn't sign for United the board really do need to have a word with themselves.
- Dortmund are unlikely to win the league, they'll finish 2nd or 3rd
- Dortmund with or without Sancho will finish either 2nd of 3rd because of their squad
- Keeping Sancho would actually increase his value, he will only be worth more as he develops more
- Dortmund have set a £108M value on Sancho which is a fair valuation considering his age and his output
- United need Sancho because they lack a RW and have done, especially since Ronaldo leaving in 2009
- United have missed out on key targets in the past including Eden Hazard (which was obviously a bad moment for the club)
- United have a free run at Sancho, they have the money and there's no other team competing for him.
- United have also said that he is the number one priority this summer.
Looking at 'Bale' as an alternative on Loan is really not the solution long-term.
I'd take Bale on loan and Sancho sure, but any situation where Sancho doesn't sign is disastrous.
I wouldn't go so far as to say any situation where Sancho doesn't sign is disastrous. What if, for example, Mason Greenwood continues his development and has a Salah style season where he scores well over 20 goals from wide right. The rest of what you say sounds reasonable enough though. Sancho, with three years left on his deal, with Dortmund in a decent financial position, is not a player that must absolutely be sold.