SAFMUTD
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 11,787
We're in a Sancho thread, I think you can figure it out it's not that hard.About what?
We're in a Sancho thread, I think you can figure it out it's not that hard.About what?
Saying you are getting worried after he played 30 minutes of a game where the whole team minus Pogba was off is just fecking dumb though, so I wanted to check.We're in a Sancho thread, I think you can figure it out it's not that hard.
I expected an energetic performance, I saw nothing like that. Of course is really soon to judge, let's wait.Saying you are getting worried after he played 30 minutes of a game where the whole team minus Pogba was off is just fecking dumb though, so I wanted to check.
I expected an energetic performance, I saw nothing like that. Of course is really soon to judge, let's wait.
His role in the team is basically being taken by Pogba at the moment. Give him time to settle, and I'm sure the torch will be handed over.
Sancho was brought in to be the wide creator opposite an inside forward, whether that be Greenwood or Rashford. Pogba was fine in that role last season out of necessity due to not having creators out wide, but its still one where ideally we'd use Sancho instead of him and move Pogba deeper if we could get a partner for him. This season it looks like Pogba is staying, in which case we'll see him split between the wing and the middle. Difference is we now have Sancho who I think will very shortly become one of the first names on the teamsheet. But if we play Pogba and Sancho as the 2 wingers, then you need a real poacher up top fully focused on that role. More often than not I think we'll see Pogba used deeper again though, but we really need the right partner to him.If he's fighting Pogba for a role in the team, he'll lose...and that's not even a comment on Sancho's quality.
If Pogba signs a new deal, and it turns out that we can't find a way to play him in a conventional midfield role - which is likely imo, given that he's shown no signs of being able to do so regularly in the PL - then that wide playmaker spot floating around from the left is his (as long as he keeps up this level of performance).
Still...there's plenty of matches and plenty of minutes to go around.
Literally at this point I won’t be surprised if this season is for him to ‘settle’ and he will be coming off the bench until 23-24 or some other shit.Needs to start, this cameo nonsense is ridiculous.
Ole better not do a VdB with him.
His role in the team is basically being taken by Pogba at the moment. Give him time to settle, and I'm sure the torch will be handed over.
Over two cameo appearances?Not going to lie, I'm getting a little nervous.
That's why is a "little". If this was two complete games I would be losing my shit.Over two cameo appearances?
And here I thought we bought him to play at RW, not to add a 5th LW to the team.
You would be losing your shit over two complete games? Blimey.That's why is a "little". If this was two complete games I would be losing my shit.
Yes. I have high expectations on him. Hopefully next game will be better.You would be losing your shit over two complete games? Blimey.
I have a theory that the management don't see it as left vs right.
Its more 'creative', drop deep to get involved in the build up and pass into the front etc. vs high upthe pitch, running the channels & getting into the box directly.
Obviously both wide players are not limited to one style rigidly but more of the general pattern of play as a focus.
If you have two wide players with the same strengths you'd either lack penetration (like if Sancho and Pogba play together) or lack creativity (like if Greenwood and James/Elanga played together).
Eventually I think Greenwood will move up front and we'll see Sancho on the right and Rashford on the left.
I don’t think anyone’s suggesting he’s as good as Lukaku though. Can’t read too much into performances in the BundesligaWe always do this "easing in" bollocks.
Look at Chelsea today. Lukaku thrown in, dominates and scores.
And here I thought we bought him to play at RW, not to add a 5th LW to the team.
Well if that's the paradigm we're going for it raises even more questions...
- If we cannot (or shouldn't) play with two wide midfielders, why did we play that way after Martial came off?
- Why can we not play with two playmaking wide players? We also have penetration offered from Bruno at #10, he scores more than our #9. Also City do the same with Foden, Grealish, Mahrez, B.Silva.
- Did he get signed to be a bench warmer to Pogba?
Greenwood as well. That goal last weekend shows what he could do from the left.You just know he'll only play on the left wing.
It's inevitable now.
Good competition between Pogba, James, Rashy, Martial and Sancho though.
Best set of left sided attackers in the league.
We always do this "easing in" bollocks.
Look at Chelsea today. Lukaku thrown in, dominates and scores.
Greenwood as well. That goal last weekend shows what he could do from the left.
You just know he'll only play on the left wing.
It's inevitable now.
Good competition between Pogba, James, Rashy, Martial and Sancho though.
Best set of left sided attackers in the league.
-Pogba started playing higher up the pitch and more centrally when Sancho came on, but that's not his game.
-We could, but we'd lose a lot of counter threat and the opposition can play higher line with a higher press leading to more turnovers and less overall control and even against the deeper systems you'd have 2 players naturally in the box, rather than 3 (unless you push another central midfielder up and lose stability in the system and leave yourself open to the counter yourself).
- No he was signed to be a great team player who will be great over many seasons, with Pogba likely not being here or potentially in a deeper role if we sign a competent DCM
No way. Are people really expecting Greenwood to cement his place, while others players like Pogba, Rashford, and Sancho will rotate?