ZolaWasMagic
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,714
- Supports
- Chelsea
As a neutral i posted in a forum few weeks back that i think if Utd had bought Raphinha off Leeds instead of Sancho, [not for same fee necessarily], then Raphinha could have quite possibly performed better for you, than Sancho has up to this point. And conceivably been a better signing, because although his standing in the game isnt as high profile as Sancho, he is still quality IMO. Because for me, Sancho has been woeful for the money paid, and albeit its early, he's been a flop thus far. As have some of our signings for big fees. Few users gave me stick for it, if i remember rightly.I wasn't a big fan of us spending big on him, he's a decent player but I think he's more akin to the likes of Demari Gray and Adoman Lookman rather than say someone like Nani who had genuine moments of being world class. If you put any of those two into that Dortmund team that scores a boat load then they too would have put up big numbers.
The one wide forward that sticks out to me as having the potential to be genuinely great is St Maximin, it's a surprise to me no one's taking a punt on him. The ability to consistently skin players and have a decent final ball would be a huge asset in a team like ours. I'd honestly bite Newcastle's hands off if we could do a trade with Sancho and St Max.
In the same way i also posted that it's entirely possible, Emmanuel Dennis off Watford would have done better for us than Lukaku, if we'd signed him instead. I simply could not understand how people couldn't see my point i was making
You know something, if Saint Max could add more goals to his game, too, then i wouldnt blame you for swapping him for Sancho. He's better at going past people than Sancho is for one.